ESG表现、媒体关注度与非效率投资
ESG Performance, Media Attention and Inefficient Investment
摘要: ESG (环境、社会与治理)是当前经济主体制定投资等决策时需要考虑的重要因素之一，企业的ESG表现以及其如何对非效率投资水平产生影响是亟待解决的热点问题。基于此，本文以2011~2019年我国A股上市公司为样本，分析了企业的ESG表现与其非效率投资的关系以及媒体关注在这一环节中的作用。进一步地，本文还基于地区市场化程度的视角进行了异质性分析。研究结果显示，良好的ESG表现能够抑制企业的非效率投资，且媒体关注能够强化ESG表现对企业非效率投资的抑制作用；异质性分析结果显示ESG对非效率投资的影响及媒体关注度的调节作用均存在显著的异质性特征。
Abstract: ESG (Environment, Society and Governance) is one of the most important considerations for companies when making investment and other decisions, and how it affects the level of inefficient investment is a hot issue that needs to be investigated urgently. Based on this, this paper analyzes the impact of ESG on the level of inefficient investment of enterprises and the moderating role of media attention based on a sample of China’s A-share listed companies from 2011~2019. Further, this pa-per also conducts a heterogeneity analysis based on the perspective of regional marketization degree. The findings indicate that good ESG performance can inhibit the level of inefficient investment, and media attention can strengthen the inhibitory effect of ESG performance on corporate inefficient investment; The results of the heterogeneity analysis show that there are significant heterogeneity characteristics of the impact of ESG on inefficient investment and the moderating effect of media attention.
文章引用：朱晓圆, 李霁友. ESG表现、媒体关注度与非效率投资[J]. 金融, 2024, 14(2): 459-468. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2024.142050

参考文献

[1] Lambert, R., Leuz, C. and Verrecchia, R.E. (2007) Accounting Information, Disclosure, and the Cost of Capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45, 385-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Anwar, R. and Ma-lik, J.A. (2020) When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Affect Investment Efficiency? A New Answer to an Old Question. SAGE Open, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 陈共荣, 徐巍. 大股东特征与企业投资效率关系的实证研究[J]. 会计之友, 2011(1): 99-104.
[4] 黄毅. 管理者非理性行为与非效率投资关系研究[J]. 武汉金融, 2017(11): 34-39.
[5] 侯婧, 朱莲美. 控股股东股权质押与公司非效率投资行为[J]. 财会月刊, 2018(18): 81-89.
[6] 韩金红, 余珍. 纵向兼任高管与企业投资效率——基于“监督效应”和“掏空效应”分析[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2019, 34(4): 66-74.
[7] Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. (1958) The Cost of Capital, Corpo-ration Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 48, 261-297.
[8] Myers, S.C. and Majluf, N.S. (1984) Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Jensen, M.C. (1986) Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Cor-porate Finance, and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
[10] Dhaliwal, D.S., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A., et al. (2011) Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Re-sponsibility Reporting. Accounting Review, 86, 59-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 黄世忠. 支撑ESG的三大理论支柱[J]. 财会月刊, 2021(19): 3-10.
[12] 李新丽, 万寿义, 张雪梅. 企业社会责任能降低股价同步性吗?——基于强制披露企业社会责任报告的准自然实验[J]. 科学决策, 2018(9): 1-27.
[13] 邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(3): 108-123.
[14] 王琳璘, 廉永辉, 董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(5): 23-34.
[15] 高杰英, 褚冬晓, 廉永辉, 等. ESG表现能改善企业投资效率吗? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(11): 24-34+72.
[16] 沈洪涛, 冯杰. 舆论监督、政府监管与企业环境信息披露[J]. 会计研究, 2012(2): 72-78+97.
[17] 袁业虎, 熊笑涵. 上市公司ESG表现与企业绩效关系研究——基于媒体关注的调节作用[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(10): 68-77.
[18] Richardson, S. (2006) Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 159-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 金缦. 机构投资者的ESG偏好对绿色创新价值的影响[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2022(1): 65-75.
[20] 王小鲁, 樊纲, 胡李鹏. 中国分省份市场化指数报告[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019.

为你推荐