抗血小板治疗和下腔静脉血栓大鼠静脉管壁慢性炎症的关系
The Relationship between Antiplatelet Therapy and Chronic Inflammation of the Venous Wall in Rats with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.143751, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王立宝*:青岛大学医学部,山东 青岛;赵俊成, 李大林#:青岛市市立医院血管外科,山东 青岛
关键词: 氯吡格雷静脉血栓静脉管壁炎症单核细胞Clopidogrel Venous Thrombosis Inflammation of Venous Tube Wall Monocyte
摘要: 目的:通过建立大鼠下腔静脉血栓模型,并予氯吡格雷干预,探究其对静脉管壁血小板–单核细胞集合体水平及纤维化程度的影响。方法:将24只SD雄性大鼠随机分为假手术组、模型组、低剂量(10 mg/kg)干预组、高剂量(30 mg/kg)干预组,每组6只。对模型组和低、高剂量干预组建立下腔静脉血栓模型,造模成功后予以药物干预。假手术组和模型组予以生理盐水灌胃,低、高剂量干预组分别予以氯吡格雷10 mg/kg、30 mg/kg灌胃,每天1次,7天后取大鼠下腔静脉组织进行Masson染色、CD115免疫组化染色和CD41-CD115免疫荧光双染。结果:各组纤维化面积比例比较,差异有统计学意义(F = 132.0, P < 0.01),各组CD115荧光强度表达差异有显著性(F = 314.7, P < 0.01),各组CD41-CD115双阳率差异有显著性(F = 147.3, P < 0.01);模型组纤维化面积比例、CD115荧光强度表达、CD41-CD115双阳率明显高于假手术组(P < 0.01),氯吡格雷低、高剂量干预组三种指标水平均明显低于模型组(P < 0.01),氯吡格雷高剂量干预组三种指标水平均明显低于低剂量干预组(P < 0.05)。结论:深静脉血栓环境下,大鼠下腔静脉管壁血小板–单核细胞集合体水平、单核巨噬细胞浸润程度、纤维化程度升高,抗血小板药物氯吡格雷可能降低炎症、缓解管壁纤维化。
Abstract: Objective: To establish a rat model of inferior vena cava thrombosis and intervene with clopidogrel to explore its effects on platelet monocyte aggregation levels and fibrosis degree in the venous wall. Method: 24 male SD rats were randomly divided into a sham surgery group, a model group, a low-dose (10 mg/kg) intervention group, and a high-dose (30 mg/kg) intervention group, with 6 rats in each group. Establish inferior vena cava thrombosis models for the model group and low-dose and high-dose intervention groups, and administer medication intervention after suc-cessful modeling. The sham surgery group and model group were given physiological saline by ga-vage, while the low-dose and high-dose intervention groups were given clopidogrel 10 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg respectively, once a day. After 7 days, the inferior vena cava tissue of rats was taken for Masson staining, CD115 immunohistochemistry staining, and CD41-CD115 immunofluorescence double staining. Result: The proportion of fibrotic area in each group was compared, and the dif-ference was statistically significant (F = 132.0, P < 0.01). There was a significant difference in the expression of CD115 fluorescence intensity in each group (F = 314.7, P < 0.01), and there was a sig-nificant difference in the double positive rate of CD41-CD115 in each group (F = 147.3, P < 0.01); the proportion of fibrosis area, CD115 fluorescence intensity expression, and CD41-CD115 double posi-tive rate in the model group were significantly higher than those in the sham surgery group (P < 0.01). The levels of three indicators in the low-dose and high-dose intervention groups of clopidogrel were significantly lower than those in the model group (P < 0.01), and the average levels of three indicators in the high-dose intervention group of clopidogrel were significantly lower than those in the low-dose intervention group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In the environment of deep vein thrombosis, the levels of platelet monocyte aggregates, degree of monocyte-macrophage infiltration, and degree of fibrosis in the inferior vena cava wall of rats increase. The antiplatelet drug clopidogrel may reduce inflammation and alleviate wall fibrosis.
文章引用:王立宝, 赵俊成, 李大林. 抗血小板治疗和下腔静脉血栓大鼠静脉管壁慢性炎症的关系[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 645-651. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.143751

参考文献

[1] Raskob, G.E., Angchaisuksiri, P., Blanco, A.N., Wendelboe, A. and Weitz, J.I. (2014) Thrombosis: A Major Contributor to the Global Disease Burden. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 12, 1580-1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Makedonov, I., Kahn, S.R. and Galanaud, J.P. (2020) Prevention and Man-agement of the Post-Thrombotic Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Kahn, S.R., Solymoss, S., Lamping, D.L., et al. (2000) Long-Term Out-comes after Deep Vein Thrombosis: Postphlebitic Syndrome and Quality of Life. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15, 425-429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Yao, X., Chen, W., Liu, J., et al. (2019) Deep Vein Thrombosis Is Modulated by Inflammation Regulated via Sirtuin 1/NF-κB Signalling Pathway in a Rat Model. Throm-bosis and Haemostasis, 119, 421-430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Bouchard, B.A., Silveira, J.R. and Tracy, P.B. (2013) Chapter 21—Interactions between Platelets and the Coagulation System. In: Michelson, A.D., Ed., Platelets, Academic Press, Cambridge, 425-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Ponomaryov, T., Payne, H., Fabritz, L., et al. (2017) Mast Cells Granular Contents Are Crucial for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Mice. Circulation Research, 121, 941-950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Tang, J.J., Meng, Q.Y., Cai, Z.X., et al. (2016) Trans-plantation of VEGFl65-Overexpressing Vascular Endothelial Progenitor Cells Relieves Endothelial Injury after Deep Vein Thrombectomy. Thrombosis Research, 137, 41-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Pilard, M., Ollivier, E.L., Gourdou-Latyszenok, V., et al. (2022) Endothelial Cell Phenotype, a Major Determinant of Venous Thrombo-Inflammation. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, 864735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Kahn, S.R., Galanaud, J.P., Vedantham, S., et al. (2016) Guidance for the Prevention and Treatment of the Post-Thrombotic Syndrome. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 41, 144-153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Broholm, R., Sillesen, H., Damsgaard, M.T., et al. (2011) Postthrombotic Syndrome and Quality of Life in Patients with Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis Treated with Cathe-ter-Directed Thrombolysis. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 54, 18s-25s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Campos, J. and Brill, A. (2020) By Word of Mouse: Using Animal Models in Venous Thrombosis Research. Platelets, 31, 447-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Osborn, E.A., Kessinger, C.W., Tawakol, A. and Jaffer, F.A. (2017) Metabolic and Molecular Imaging of Atherosclerosis and Venous Thromboembolism. Journal of Nuclear Medi-cine, 58, 871-877.
[13] von Brühl, M.L., Stark, K., Steinhart, A., et al. (2012) Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets Cooperate to Initiate and Propagate Venous Thrombosis in Mice in Vivo. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 209, 819-835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Sarma, J., Laan, C.A., Alam, S., et al. (2002) Increased Platelet Binding to Circulating Monocytes in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation, 105, 2166-2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Mandel, J., Casari, M., Stepanyan, M., et al. (2022) Beyond Hemostasis: Platelet Innate Immune Interactions and Thromboinflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23, 3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Lenzo, J.C., Turner, A.L., Cook, A.D., et al. (2012) Control of Macrophage Lineage Populations by CSF-1 Receptor and GM-CSF in Homeostasis and Inflammation. Im-munology & Cell Biology, 90, 429-440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Franchi, F., Rollini, F., Rivas Rios, J., et al. (2018) Pharmacodynamic Ef-fects of Switching from Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Results of the SWAP-4 Study. Circulation, 137, 2450-2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Gurbel, P.A., Malinin, A.I., Callahan, K.P., et al. (2002) Effect of Loading with Clopidogrel at the Time of Coronary Stenting on Platelet Aggregation and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Expression and Platelet-Leukocyte Aggregate Formation. The American Journal of Cardiology, 90, 312-315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef