论司法鉴定人出庭制度研究
Study on the Court Appearance System of Judicial Appreciator
摘要: 司法鉴定得出的结论作为司法过程中极为重要的一类证据,其采信和采纳的过程必要的前提就是司法鉴定人出庭作证,对于案件中的争议点接受诉讼双方的质询。迄今为止,虽然我国已经以明文法律的形式规定了司法鉴定人出庭,但是仍难以将这一制度有效实施。抛开司法鉴定的科学性以及权威性,我们需要着眼于司法鉴定自身的属性和特点探究其本质,从其满足诉讼和行业两方面角度分析,以达到促进司法过程公正的作用。
Abstract: As a very important kind of evidence in the judicial process, the conclusion drawn by judicial authentication is the necessary premise of its acceptance and adoption process, which is that the judicial expert testifies in court and accepts the inquiry of both parties for the disputed points in the case. However, although the system of judicial witnesses appearing in court has been stipulated in the relevant documents at present, it still cannot exclude the effective implementation of the cross-examination link of judicial witnesses appearing in court. Apart from the scientific nature and authority of forensic expertise, we need to focus on the aspect of forensic expertise as a lawsuit participation activity, from the aspects of laws and regulations, technical norms, professional ethics and other aspects of its analysis, to achieve the role of promoting justice in the judicial process.
文章引用:董昊. 论司法鉴定人出庭制度研究[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(3): 163-169. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2024.103181

参考文献

[1] 杜志淳, 廖根为. 论我国司法鉴定人出庭质证制度的完善[J]. 法学, 2011(7): 80-86.
[2] 张军, 主编. 司法鉴定制度与改革完善研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2018.
[3] 李奇. 影响司法鉴定质量的因素分析及对策[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2008(S2): 44-47.
[4] 陈瑞华. 论司法鉴定人的出庭作证[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2005(4): 10-11.
[5] 刘建伟. 论我国司法鉴定人出庭作证制度的完善[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2010(5): 22-27.
[6] 杜志淳, 主编. 司法鉴定概论[M]. 第3版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018: 135.
[7] 张志英, 王梦超. 我国司法鉴定人出庭作证制度实证研究——以河南省为例[J]. 河南工程学院学报(社会科学版), 2021, 36(4): 70-76.
[8] 李骄阳. 我国司法鉴定人出庭制度存在的问题及对策[J]. 法制博览, 2020(22): 90-91.
[9] 杨小雨. 司法鉴定人出庭作证费用制度研究[J]. 镇江高专学报, 2022, 35(1): 53-58.