具身视域下太极柔力球运动文化认同对心理弹性影响的路径阐释
Path Interpretation of the Influence of Cultural Identity of Tai Chi Rouli-Ball Sport on Resilience from Embodied Perspective
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2024.143143, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 林 鑫, 王玉秀*:浙江工业大学体育军训部,浙江 杭州
关键词: 具身认知柔力球运动文化认同心理弹性Embodied Cognition Rouli-Ball Sports Cultural Identity Psychological Resilience
摘要: 研究基于具身认知视角,阐释太极柔力球运动的文化认同对个体心理弹性的可能影响路径,采用文献资料法、逻辑演绎法厘清个体对太极柔力球运动文化认同的形成过程,以及柔力球运动文化认同促进心理弹性积极发展的可能路径。研究表明:基于柔力球运动的具身体验利于个体形成对儒家文化“身心合一”“对立统一”“刚柔并济”以及道家文化“以柔克刚”“顺其自然”等文化内涵的认知评价、情感体验及行为表现。个体形成柔力球运动文化认同后,可能进一步建立乐观认知模式和应对方式促进心理弹性的发展。研究为不同群体心理弹性的实践干预提供了理论支撑,建议未来可以从具身认知视角下展开传统体育项目影响心理弹性的实验研究,为全民心理健康素养的提升提供实践指导。
Abstract: Based on the perspective of embodied cognition, the study explains the possible influence of the cultural identity of Tai Chi rouli-ball on individuals’ psychological resilience, and clarifies the for-mation process of individuals’ cultural identity of Tai Chi rouli-ball and the possible paths of cultural identity of rouli-ball to promote the positive development of psychological resilience by adopting the literature method and the logical deduction method. The research showed: Based on the physi-cal experience of Tai Chi rouli-ball sport, individuals were better able to form cognitive evaluations, emotional experiences, and behavioral expressions of the cultural connotations of Confucianism such as “body and mind harmonization”, “unity of opposites”, “combining strength and flexibility”, as well as the cultural connotations of Taoism such as “flexibility overcoming strength” and “com-plying with nature”. After individuals formed an identification with the cultural identity of Tai Chi rouli-ball sport, they may further establish optimistic cognitive patterns and coping mechanisms to promote the development of psychological resilience. The study provided theoretical support for practical interventions in psychological resilience for different groups. It was suggested that in the future, experimental research on the impact of traditional sports projects on psychological resili-ence can be conducted from an embodied cognitive perspective, providing practical guidance for enhancing the mental health literacy of the general population.
文章引用:林鑫, 王玉秀 (2024). 具身视域下太极柔力球运动文化认同对心理弹性影响的路径阐释. 心理学进展, 14(3), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2024.143143

参考文献

[1] 陈春峰, 滕育松(2015). 柔力球研究. 体育文化导刊, (12), 53-57.
[2] 蒋信柏(2010). 老子. 道德经. 蓝天出版社.
[3] 邓小峰(2005). 论老庄自然主义人生价值观及其现代意义. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 中南大学.
[4] 刘朝辉(2020). 体育锻炼对大学生负性情绪的影响——自我效能感与心理韧性的中介和调节作用. 体育学刊, 27(5), 102-108.
[5] 王沛, 胡发稳(2011). 民族文化认同: 内涵与结构. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 40(1), 101-107.
[6] 王圣焘, 王宏(2021). 从“太极娱乐球”到“柔力球”——柔力球运动的概念流变与文化诠释. 武汉体育学院学报, 55(12), 65-70.
[7] 雍琳, 万明刚(2003). 影响藏族大学生藏、汉文化认同的因素研究. 心理与行为研究, (3), 181-185.
[8] 席居哲, 左志宏, 唐晓艳, 马伟军(2015a). 高心理弹性者情绪唤起反应变化的时间动态特征: 行为学证据. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 33(3), 79-87.
[9] 席居哲, 桑标, 左志宏(2008). 心理弹性(Resilience)研究的回顾与展望. 心理科学, 31(4), 995-998+977.
[10] 席居哲, 曾也恬, 左志宏(2015b). 中国心理弹性思想探源. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(3), 555-559.
[11] 肖计划(1992). 应付与应付方式. 中国心理卫生杂志, (4), 181-183.
[12] 杨建营(2013). 太极柔力球运动的文化内涵及其思想根源剖析. 北京体育大学学报, 36(6), 36-42.
[13] 杨中芳(2009). 传统文化与社会科学结合之实例: 中庸的社会心理学研究. 中国人民大学学报, 23(3), 53-60.
[14] 张路, 程元晋(2015). 太极柔力球的文化内涵及价值体现. 体育研究与教育, 30(2), 101-103.
[15] 赵富学(2018). 论身体运动与身体认知的具身性转向. 武汉体育学院学报, 52(8), 10-19.
[16] 郑彩花, 张玉柱, 侯友, 田磊(2018). 内蒙古地区大学生文化认同的结构与测量. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版), 40(2), 173-179.
[17] 周浩, 周倩羽(2022). 体育锻炼赋能大学生主观幸福感提升: 认知重评与心理韧性的链式中介作用. 山东体育学院学报, 38(1), 105-111.
[18] 朱丹(2022). 高校中华优秀传统文化认同教育的四维建构与促进路径. 社会科学家, (8), 141-147.
[19] 朱熹(1983). 四书章句集注. 中华书局.
[20] Andermo, S., Hallgren, M., Nguyen, T. T. D., Jonsson, S., Petersen, S., Friberg, M., & Elinder, L. S. (2020). School-Related Physical Activity Interventions and Mental Health among Children: A Systematic Review and Me-ta-Analysis. Sports Medicine-Open, 6, Article No. 25.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Beardslee, W. R. (1989). The Role of Self-Understanding in Resilient Individuals: The Development of a Perspective. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 266-278.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Cheung, T. S., Chan, H. M., Chan, K. M., King, A. Y. C., Chiu, C. Y., & Yang, C. F. (2003). On Zhongyong Rationality: The Confucian Doctrine of the Mean as a Missing Link Between Instrumental Rationality and Communicative Rationality. Asian Journal of Social Science, 31, 107-127.[CrossRef
[23] Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Develop-ment of a New Resilience Scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76-82.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Forbes, S., & Fikretoglu, D. (2018). Building Resilience: The Conceptual Basis and Research Evidence for Resilience Training Programs. Review of General Psychology, 22, 452-468.[CrossRef
[25] Garmezy, N. (1991). Resilience in Children’s Adaptation to Negative Life Events and Stressed Environments. Pediatric Annals, 20, 459-466.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Jefferies, P., Ungar, M., Aubertin, P., & Kriellaars, D. (2019). Physical Literacy and Resilience in Children and Youth. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, Article 346.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, Control, and Per-ception of Relationships in the Environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943-955.[CrossRef
[28] Kamini, P. S. M. (2019). Inculcating Resilience through Physical Ac-tivity among Children. Humanities, 6, 34-42.[CrossRef
[29] Kilpatrick, L. A., Siddarth, P., Milillo, M. M., Krause-Sorio, B., Ercoli, L., Narr, K. L., & Lavretsky, H. (2022). Impact of Tai Chi as an Adjunct Treatment on Brain Connectivity in Geriatric De-pression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 315, 1-6.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Kumpfer, K. L. (1999). Factors and Processes Contributing to Resili-ence: The Resilience Framework. In M. D. Glantz, & J. L. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and Development. Longitudinal Re-search in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Series (pp. 179-224). Kluwer Academic Publishers.[CrossRef
[31] Kunzler, A. M., Helmreich, I., Chmitorz, A., König, J., Binder, H., Wessa, M., & Lieb, K. (2020). Psychological Interventions to Foster Resilience in Healthcare Professionals. Cochrane Da-tabase of Systematic Reviews, No. 7, CD012527.[CrossRef
[32] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual Constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420-430.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Masten, A. S., & O’Connor, M. J. (1989). Vulnerability, Stress, and Resilience in the Early Development of a High Risk Child. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychi-atry, 28, 274-278.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Olsson, C. A., Bond, L., Burns, J. M., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Sawyer, S. M. (2003). Adolescent Resilience: A Concept Analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 1-11.[CrossRef
[35] Richardson, G. E. (2002). The Metatheory of Resilience and Re-siliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 307-321.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a Dynamic Concept. Development and Psy-chopathology, 24, 335-344.[CrossRef
[37] Shapiro, L. A. (2019). Embodied Cognition. Routledge.[CrossRef
[38] Soto, J. A., Perez, C. R., Kim, Y.-H., Lee, E. A., & Minnick, M. R. (2011). Is Expressive Suppression Always Associated with Poorer Psychological Functioning? A Cross-Cultural Compari-son between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11, 1450-1455.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Tomyn, A. J., & Weinberg, M. K. (2018). Resilience and Subjective Wellbeing: A Psychometric Evaluation in Young Australian Adults. Australian Psychologist, 53, 68-76.[CrossRef
[40] Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural Variation in Affect Valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 288-307.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Tsai, J. L., Miao, F. F., Seppala, E., Fung, H. H., & Yeung, D. Y. (2007). Influence and Adjustment Goals: Sources of Cultural Differences in Ideal Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1102-1117.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Ungar, M., Brown, M., Liebenberg, L., Othman, R., Kwong, W. M., Armstrong, M., & Gilgun, J. (2007). Unique Pathways to Resilience across Cultures. Adolescence, 42, 287-310.
[43] Wu, J. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2005). Development of a Zhong-Yong Thinking Style Scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 24, 247-300.
[44] Yu, X., & Zhang, J. (2007). Factor Analysis and Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese People. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35, 19-30.[CrossRef