手术优先模式治疗骨性III类错颌畸形的研究进展
Research Progress of Surgical Priority Model in the Treatment of Bone Class III Malocclusion
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.143784, PDF,   
作者: 娜菲斯·阿不力米提*, 买买提吐逊·吐尔地#:新疆医科大学第一附属医院,附属口腔医院,口腔颌面创伤正颌外科,新疆 乌鲁木齐;新疆维吾尔自治区口腔医学研究所,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 手术优先正畸–正颌联合治疗正颌外科数字化技术Surgery-First Orthodontic-Orthognathic Surgery Orthognathic Surgery Digital Technology
摘要: 正畸–正颌联合治疗是矫正严重牙颌面畸形的主要方法,包括传统正畸–正颌治疗和手术优先方案(surgical first approach, SFA)。常规正畸–正颌治疗包括3个不同的治疗阶段:术前正畸去代偿、正颌手术矫正骨骼和术后正畸调整咬合。为了防止术前正畸引起的面部畸形进一步恶化,缩短整体治疗时间以及提高患者满意度,研究者们提出了手术优先入路。即患者术前不进行正畸治疗,直接进行手术截骨,再术后正畸改良咬合关系。与传统的正畸–正颌联合治疗相比,SFA具有明显的优势,但同时适应病例的选择也更为严格。SFA作为传统正畸治疗的替代方案,近年来已成为研究热点之一,为了达到更完美的效果,其对数字化的应用,术前手术设计和操作者能力的要求不断增加。本文就手术优先方式的发展、适应证、非适应症、优缺点、数字化技术的应用进行综述,希望能为临床医生在选择治疗方式时提供一定的参考价值。
Abstract: Combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment is the primary method for correcting severe occlusal facial deformities, including the traditional orthodontic-orthognathic treatment and surgical first approach (SFA). Conventional orthodontic-orthognathic treatment consists of three different stages of treatment: preoperative orthodontic decompensation, orthognathic bone correction, and post-operative orthodontic occlusal adjustment. In order to prevent the further deterioration of facial deformities caused by preoperative orthodontics, shorten the overall treatment time and improve patient satisfaction, the researchers proposed a surgical priority approach. That is, patients do not undergo orthodontic treatment before surgery, or try to use the shortest time before surgery to fi-ne-tune the orthodontic, directly perform surgical osteotomy, and then orthodontic improvement of the occlusal relationship after surgery. Compared with the traditional orthodontic-orthognathic combined treatment, SFA has obvious advantages, but at the same time, the selection of adaptive cases is stricter. As an alternative to traditional orthodontic treatment, SFA has become one of the research hotspots in recent years, and in order to achieve more perfect results, its requirements for digital application, preoperative surgical design and operator ability are increasing. In this paper, the development, indications, off-indications, advantages and disadvantages, and the application of digital technology of surgical priority methods are reviewed, hoping to provide certain reference value for clinicians when choosing treatment methods.
文章引用:娜菲斯·阿不力米提, 买买提吐逊·吐尔地. 手术优先模式治疗骨性III类错颌畸形的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 870-876. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.143784

参考文献

[1] 贺红, 彭聪. 骨性III类错牙合正畸治疗[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2010, 3(5): 265-269.
[2] 鲍秋红. 成人骨性安氏III类错(牙合)不同垂直骨面型切牙冠根形态的CBCT分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古医科大学, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Proffit, W.R. and White Jr., R.P. (2015) Com-bined Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment: How Did It Evolve and What Are the Best Practices Now? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 147, S205-S215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Luther, F., Morris, D.O. and Hart, C. (2003) Orthodontic Prepa-ration for Orthognathic Surgery: How Long Does It Take and Why? A Retrospective Study. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41, 401-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Mahmood, H.T., Ahmed, M., Fida, M., et al. (2018) Con-cepts, Protocol, Variations and Current Trends in Surgery First Orthognathic Approach: A Literature Review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 23, 36.e1-36.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] O’Brian, K., Wright, J., Conboy, F., et al. (2009) Pro-spective, Multi-Center Study of the Effectiveness of Orthedontic/Orthognathic Surgery Care in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135, 709-714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Liou, E.J., Chen, P.H., Wang, Y.C., et al. (2011) Surgery-First Accelerated Orthognathic Surgery: Orthodontic Guidelines and Setup for Model Surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, 69, 771-780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Baek, S.H., Ahn, H.W., Kwon, Y.H., et al. (2010) Surgery-First Approach in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Treated with 2-Jaw Surgery. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 21, 332-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 樊蓉, 常新. 手术优先模式治疗骨性牙颌面畸形的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(5): 471-475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Uribe, F., Agarwal, S., Shafer, D., et al. (2015) Increasing Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgery Treatment Efficiency with a Modified Surgery-First Approach. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 148, 838-848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Choi, D.S., Garagiola, U. and Kim, S.G. (2019) Current Status of the Surgery-First Approach (Part I): Concepts and Orthodontic Protocols. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Sur-gery, 41, Article No. 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Amodeo, G., Meuli, S., Carboni, A., et al. (2020) Surgery First and Invisalign System: Combined Digital Approach. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 31, 1681-1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Jeong, W.S., Lee, J.Y. and Choi, J.W. (2017) Large-Scale Study of Long-Term Anteroposterior Stability in a Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach without Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 28, 2016-2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Nagasaka, H., Sugawara, J., Kawamura, H., et al. (2009) “Surgery First” Skeletal Class III Correction Using the Skeletal Anchorage System. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 43, 97-105.
[15] Yu, H.B., Mao, L.X., Wang, X.D., et al. (2015) the Surgery-First Approach in Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 50 Cases. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 44, 1463-1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Kim, C.S., Lim, S., Kung, H., et al. (2014) Stability of Mandibular Setback Surgery with and without Presurgical Orthodontics. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 72, 779-787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Kwon, T.G. and Han, M.D. (2019) Current Status of Surgery First Approach (Part II): Precautions and Complications. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 41, Article No. 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Park, H.M., Lee, Y.K., Choi, J.H., et al. (2014) Maxillary Incisor Inclination of Skeletal Class III Patients Treated with Extraction of the Upper First Premolars and Two-Jaw Surgery: Conventional Orthognathic Surgery vs Surgery-First Approach. The Angle Orthodontist, 84, 720-729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Min, B.H., Choi, H. and Back, S.H. (2014) Comparison of Treatment Duration between Conventional Three-Stage Method and Surgery-First Approach in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25, 1752-1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Yang, L., Xiao, Y.D., Liang, Y.J., et al. (2017) Does the Surgery-First Approach Produce Better Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 75, 2422-2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Park, J., Choi, J., Yang, I., et al. (2015) Patient’s Satisfaction in Skeletal Class III Cases Treated with Two-Jaw Surgery Using Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 26, 2086-2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Zhao, L., Patel, P.K. and Cohen, M. (2012) Application of Virtual Surgical Planning with Computer Assisted Design and Manufacturing Technology to Cranio-Maxillofacial Sur-gery. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 39, 309-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Ima, J., Kangb, S.H., Leea, J.Y., Kimb, M.K. and Kima, J.H. (2014) Surgery-First Approach Using a Three-Dimensional Virtual Setup and Surgical Simulation for Skeletal Class III Correc-tion. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 44, 330-341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Choi, J.W., Lee, J.Y., Yang, S.J., et al. (2015) The Reliability of a Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach without Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment for Skeletal Class III Dentofacial Deformity. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 74, 333-341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Swennen, G.R., Mollemans, W., De Clercq, C., Abeloos, J., Lamoral, P., Lippens, F., et al. (2009) A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Triple Scan Procedure to Obtain a Three-Dimensional Augmented Virtual Skull Model Appropriate for Orthognathic Surgery Planning. Journal of Cranio-facial Surgery, 20, 297-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Choi, J.Y., Song, K.G. and Baek, S.H. (2009) Virtual Model Surgery and Wafer Fabrication for Orthognathic Surgery. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 38, 1306-1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Zhu, Y., Zou, Y., Yu, Q., et al. (2018) Combined Sur-gical-Orthodontic Treatment of Patients with Cleidocranial Dysplasia: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Or-phanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 13, Article No. 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Plooij, J.M., Maal, T.J., Haers, P., et al. (2011) Digital Three-Dimensional Image Fusion Processes for Planning and Evaluating Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 40, 341-352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Brunso, J., Franco, M., Constantinescu, T., et al. (2016) Cus-tom-Machined Miniplates and Bone-Supported Guides for Orthognathic Surgery: A New Surgical Procedure. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 74, 1061.E1-1061.E12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]