分化型甲状腺癌131I后治疗反应动态变化及与复发危险分层和TNM分期的关系
Dynamic Changes in Treatment Response af-ter 131I in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Their Relationship with Recurrence Risk Stratification and TNM Staging
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2024.143813, PDF,   
作者: 狄 璐, 郭彦君, 余霄龙, 赵文娟, 李成乾*:青岛大学附属医院内分泌代谢病科,山东 青岛;许 翔:青岛大学附属医院国际医疗中心,山东 青岛;王国强:青岛大学附属医院核医学科,山东 青岛
关键词: 分化型甲状腺癌131I治疗最佳治疗反应(ER)复发危险分层TNM分期Differentiated Thyroid Cancer 131I Therapy Best Therapeutic Response (ER) Recurrence Risk Stratification TNM Staging
摘要: 目的:探讨分化型甲状腺癌(DTC) 131I后治疗反应的动态变化及与复发危险分层及TNM分期的关系。方法:选取行甲状腺全切术、术后病理证实为DTC且仅有淋巴结转移并行131I治疗患者,分析治疗反应变化及与随访时间、复发危险分层及TNM分期的关系。结果:(1) 423例DTC患者131I治疗后最佳治疗反应(ER)率、结构性改变(SIR)率与随访时间延长呈强正相关(r = 0.978、0.958,均P < 0.05),而疗效不确定(IR)率、生化改变(BIR)率与时间呈强负相关(r = −0.971、−0.966,均P < 0.05);与3个月比较,2年ER率、SIR率升高,IR率、BIR率降低,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);进一步分析显示:ER中仅有4.4% (11/250)转变为非ER,而IR中63.41% (52/82)、BIR中25% (22/88)转变为ER;BIR中14.77% (13/88)转变为SIR;(2) 131I治疗后2年ER率与复发危险度高呈弱负相关(r = −0.210,P < 0.05),BIR率、SIR率与之呈弱正相关(分别r = 0.160、0.191,均P < 0.05),IR率与之无关(P > 0.05);131I治疗后2年治疗反应与TNM分期呈无相关性(均P > 0.05);(3) 不同复发危险分层及TNM分期中,ER率均随着时间延长而升高,与3个月比较,治疗后2年复发危险中、高危组及TNM-I期组ER率均明显升高(均P < 0.05)。结论:131I后治疗反应呈动态变化,大多数IR转变为ER;ER随时间延长而上升,随复发危险分层程度加重而下降,动态评估对治疗和管理有指导价值。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the dynamics of treatment response after 131I in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and its relationship with recurrence risk stratification and TNM staging. Methods: Pa-tients who underwent total thyroidectomy with postoperative pathologically confirmed DTC and only lymph node metastasis and were treated with 131I were selected to analyze the changes in re-sponse to treatment and the relationship with follow-up time, recurrence risk stratification, and TNM stage. Results: (1) The rates of best therapeutic response (ER) and structural alteration (SIR) after 131I treatment in 423 DTC patients showed strong positive correlation with the prolongation of follow-up time (r = 0.978, 0.958, both P < 0.05), whereas the rates of uncertainty of efficacy (IR) and biochemical alteration (BIR) showed strong negative correlation with time (r = −0.971, −0.966, both P < 0.05); compared with 3 months, the 2-year ER and SIR rates were increased, and the IR and BIR rates were decreased, all of which were statistically significant (all P < 0.05); further analysis showed that only 4.4% (11/250) of the ERs were converted to non-ERs, whereas 63.41% (52/82) of the IRs, and 25% (22/88) of the BIRs, were converted to ERs; BIRs 14.77% (13/88) converted to SIR; (2) ER rate at 2 years after 131I treatment was weakly negatively correlated with high risk of recurrence (r = −0.210, P < 0.05), BIR rate and SIR rate were weakly positively correlated ( r = 0.160, 0.191, respectively, both P < 0.05), and IR rate was not correlated (P > 0.05); there was no correlation between the response to treatment and TNM staging at 2 years after 131I treatment (both P > 0.05); (3) the ER rate increased with time in different recurrence risk stratification and TNM stage, and compared with 3 months, the ER rate was significantly higher in the intermediate- and high-risk groups of recurrence risk and the TNM-I stage group at 2 years after treatment (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: The response to treatment after 131I is dynamic, with most IR converted to ER; ER rises with prolonged time and decreases with the degree of recurrence risk stratification, and the dynamic assessment is valuable in guiding treatment and management.
文章引用:狄璐, 许翔, 郭彦君, 王国强, 余霄龙, 赵文娟, 李成乾. 分化型甲状腺癌131I后治疗反应动态变化及与复发危险分层和TNM分期的关系[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 1083-1090. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.143813

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会核医学分会. 131I治疗分化型甲状腺癌指南(2021版) [J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2021, 41(4): 218-241.
[2] 中华医学会内分泌学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组, 中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会, 等. 甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南(第二版) [J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2023, 39(3): 181-226.
[3] Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2019) Estimating the Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN Sources and Methods. International Journal of Cancer, 144, 1941-1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 汪鑫, 武晓娜, 曹力钒, 等. 改良Miccoli手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及术后复发的相关因素分析[J]. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(2): 172-175.
[5] Lee, E.K., Kang, Y.E., Park, Y.J., et al. (2021) A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial for Assessing the Usefulness of Suppressing Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Target Levels after Thyroid Lobectomy in Low to Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer Patients (Master): A Study Protocol. Endocrinology and Metabolism, 36, 574-581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 谭建, 蒋宁一, 李林, 等. 131I治疗分化型甲状腺癌指南(2014版) [J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2014, 34(4): 264-278.
[7] Pitoia, F., Bueno, F., Urciuoli, C., et al. (2013) Out-comes of Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Risk-Stratified According to the American Thyroid Association and Latin American Thyroid Society Risk of Recurrence Classification System. Thyroid, 23, 1401-1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Haugen, B.R., Alexander, E.K., Bible, K.C., et al. (2016) 2015 Ameri-can Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid, 26, 1-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 甲状腺癌诊疗规范(2018年版) [J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 1-15.
[10] 孙威, 贺亮, 张浩. 美国癌症联合委员会甲状腺癌分期系统(第8版)更新解读[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(3): 255-258.
[11] 胡厚洋, 梁军, 林岩松. 影响分化型甲状腺癌131I治疗获得最佳疗效反应的因素分析及治疗后的动态评估[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(1): 18-21.
[12] Tuttle, R.M., Tala, H., Shah, J., et al. (2010) Estimating Risk of Recurrence in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer after Total Thyroidectomy and Radioactive Iodine Remnant Ablation: Using Response to Therapy Variables to Modify the Initial Risk Estimates Predicted by the New American Thyroid Association Staging System. Thyroid, 20, 1341-1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Castagna, M.G., Maino, F., Cipri, C., et al. (2011) Delayed Risk Strati-fication, to Include the Response to Initial Treatment (Surgery and Radioiodine Ablation), Has Better Outcome Predic-tivity in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients. European Journal of Endocrinology, 165, 441-446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 刘杰蕊, 梁军, 林岩松. 分化型甲状腺癌131I治疗前刺激性Tg与最佳治疗反应的关系[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(2): 125-130.