注意捕获过程中的数据驱动理论和信号抑制假说再验证
Further Validation of Data-Driven Theory and Signal Suppression Hypothesis in Attentional Capture Process
摘要: 数据驱动理论认为显著单例会自动吸引注意,而信号抑制假说认为个体可以主动抑制一个无关的显著干扰物。采用Chang和Egeth (2020)的实验范式,验证中国青少年的注意捕获是否遵循数据驱动理论。在70%搜索试验中,被试在有无显著颜色干扰各半的试验中搜索目标图形。而另30%探测试验中,探索被试主动抑制的学习成果。探测实验结果表明,当探测目标呈现在中性色项目上时,被试所用反应时显著短于其在目标色和干扰色项目上。探测目标在中性色项目上时的正确率也显著高于其在目标色和干扰色项目上。因此,中国青少年的注意捕获遵循数据驱动理论。
Abstract: The data-driven theory suggests that significant instances automatically attract attention, while the signal suppression hypothesis assumes that observers can actively suppress an unrelated significant disruptor. Using the experimental paradigm of Chang and Egeth (2020), this study aims to verify whether attention capture among Chinese high school students follows data-driven theory. In a 70% search experiment, participants searched for target shapes in experiments with and without significant color interference. In the 30% detection experiment, explore the learning outcomes actively suppressed by the subjects. The detection experiment results show that when the detection target appears on the neutral color item, the reaction time used by the subjects is significantly shorter than on the target color and interference color items. The accuracy of detecting targets in neutral color projects is significantly higher than that in target color and interference color projects. Therefore, the attention capture of the subjects follows the data-driven theory.
文章引用:梁杰璇. 注意捕获过程中的数据驱动理论和信号抑制假说再验证[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(3): 334-339. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.133222

参考文献

[1] 张明, 王爱君. 视觉搜索中基于工作记忆内容的注意捕获与抑制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(12): 1899-1907.
[2] Theeuwes, J. (2004) Top-Down Search Strategies Cannot Override Attentional Capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Theeuwes, J., de Vries, G.J. and Godijn, R. (2003) Attentional and Oculomotor Capture with Static Singletons. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 735-746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W. and Johnston, J.C. (1992) Involuntary Covert Orienting Is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W. and Wright, J.H. (1994) The Structure of Attentional Control: Contingent Attentional Capture by Apparent Motion, Abrupt Onset, and Color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 317-329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Folk, C.L. and Remington, R. (1998) Selectivity in Distraction by Irrelevant Featural Singletons: Evidence for Two Forms of Attentional Capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Theeuwes, J. (1992) Perceptual Selectivity for Color and Form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chen, P. and Mordkoff, J.T. (2007) Contingent Capture at a Very Short SOA: Evidence against Rapid Disengagement. Visual Cognition, 15, 637-646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Sawaki, R. and Luck, S.J. (2010) Capture versus Suppression of Attention by Salient Singletons: Electrophysiological Evidence for an Automatic Attend-to-Me Signal. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1455-1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 张帆, 陈艾睿, 董波, 王爱君, 张明. 视觉注意捕获的快速脱离假说与信号抑制假说[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 45-55.
[11] Chang, S. and Egeth, H.E. (2020) Can Salient Stimuli Really Be Suppressed? Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 83, 260-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Van Selst, M. and Jolicoeur, P. (1994) A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47, 631-650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Gaspelin, N. and Luck, S.J. (2018a) Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 1265-1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]