进口商品销售行为中商标使用的认定
Determination of Trademark Use in Sales Practices of Imported Goods
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.103190, PDF,   
作者: 张泰然:华东政法大学知识产权学院,上海
关键词: 商标使用进口商品地域性使用主体Trademark Use Imported Goods Territoriality Subject of Use
摘要: 由于数据网络的逐渐普及,经济全球化程度提升,国家间电子商务活动也日益频繁,也暴露了进口商品销售行为中商标使用的认定问题。核心在于我国目前“商标使用”概念的外延与内涵尚不明晰,“地域性”与“商标使用”之间的联系有待梳理。通过探究概念的底层逻辑,依据法律与学理确认“地域性”是商标权的固有属性,而商标使用仅是行为的定性。虽然国内对于商标使用的理解尚未形成定论,但销售进口商品都能够满足各方学说列明的构成要件。再明确“商标使用”从未限制使用主体只能是商标权人与商标所识别而出的并非只有商标权人,也就能回应所有的实务疑惑。最终得出结论,销售进口商品构成商标使用,司法应当一视同仁以示公平公正。
Abstract: Due to the gradual popularization of data networks, the degree of economic globalization has increased, and e-commerce activities between countries have become more and more frequent, which has also exposed the problem of determining the use of trademarks in the sale of imported goods. The core of the problem lies in the fact that the extension and connotation of the concept of “trademark use” in China are still unclear, and the connection between “territoriality” and “trademark use” needs to be sorted out. By exploring the underlying logic of the concept, it is confirmed that “territoriality” is an inherent attribute of trademark right, while trademark use is only a characterization of the act, based on law and doctrine. Although the domestic understanding of trademark use has not yet been finalized, the sale of imported goods can satisfy the constituent elements set out in the various doctrines. It is also clear that “trademark use” never restricts the subject of use to the trademark owner and the trademark owner is not the only one who is recognized by the trademark, which can also respond to all the practical doubts. Finally concluded that the sale of imported goods constitute trademark use, justice should be treated equally to show fairness and justice.
文章引用:张泰然. 进口商品销售行为中商标使用的认定[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(3): 226-231. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2024.103190

参考文献

[1] 王迁, 主编. 力量与利益: 知识产权保护案例启示录[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2019: 142.
[2] 吴汉东. 知识产权基本问题研究(分论) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2009: 340.
[3] 孔祥俊. 商标使用行为法律构造的实质主义: 基于涉外定牌加工商标侵权案的展开[J]. 中外法学, 2020, 32(5): 1283-1307.
[4] 芮文彪, 凌宗亮. 新商标法视角下商标注册与使用的平衡[J]. 人民司法, 2015(3): 89-94.
[5] 凌宗亮. 域外商标使用行为的效力及其判断[J]. 载知识产权, 2019(12): 45-52.
[6] 祝建军. 判定商标侵权应以成立“商标性使用”为前提——苹果公司商标案引发的思考[J]. 知识产权. 2014(1): 22-28, 94.
[7] 姚鹤徽. 商标侵权构成中“商标使用”地位之反思与重构[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2019, 22(5): 141-158.
[8] 曹佳音. 我国商标法中“商标使用”概念辨析——以贴牌加工为线索[J]. 北方法学, 2016, 10(2): 27-39.
[9] 孔祥俊. 商标法原理与判例[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 608, 746, 754.