城市轨道交通网络关键节点识别与抗毁性分析
Identification of Key Nodes and Invulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Network
摘要: 如何准确高效识别关键节点和分析网络在突发事件下的抗毁性对于城市轨道交通网络的运行具有重要意义。首先,采用Space L方法构建城市轨道交通网络,定量分析网络的统计特性;然后,考虑到节点间的连接关系,以共同邻居节点数量定义接近度函数,并将接近度作为分配比例改进PageRank算法,使用改进算法识别网络的关键节点;最后建立级联失效模型,分析城市轨道交通网络在不同攻击方式下的抗毁性。以苏州轨道交通为例进行实证研究,结果表明:无论有无级联失效,苏州轨道交通网络面对随机攻击表现出较强的抗毁性,面对蓄意攻击时表现出脆弱性。同时,考虑级联失效的苏州轨道交通网络是更脆弱的。
Abstract: It is of great significance for the operation of urban rail transit network how to accurately and efficiently identify key nodes and analyze the network’s invulnerability under emergencies. Firstly, the Space L method is used to construct the urban rail transit network, and the statistical characteristics of the network are quantitatively analyzed. Then, considering the connection relationship between nodes, the proximity function is defined by the number of common neighbor nodes, and the proximity is used as the distribution ratio to improve PageRank algorithm. The improved algorithm is used to identify the key nodes of the network. Finally, a cascading failure model is established to analyze the invulnerability of urban rail transit network under different attack modes. The paper takes the Suzhou rail transit network as an example to make an empirical analysis. The results show that regardless of whether there is a cascading failure, Suzhou rail transit network shows strong resistance to random attacks and vulnerability to deliberate attacks. At the same time, in the case of cascading failure, Suzhou rail transit network is more fragile.
文章引用:薛欢, 倪静. 城市轨道交通网络关键节点识别与抗毁性分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(2): 1739-1749. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.132164

参考文献

[1] Zhang, J., Wang, S. and Wang, X. (2018) Comparison Analysis on Vulnerability of Metro Networks Based on Complex Network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 496, 72-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Wang, Y. and Tian, C. (2021) Measure Vulnerability of Metro Network under Cascading Failure. IEEE ACCESS, 9, 683-692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 蔡鉴明, 邓薇. 长沙地铁网络复杂特性与级联失效鲁棒性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2019, 16(6): 1587-1596.
[4] 曲迎春, 徐仲之, 龚航, 等. 城市轨道交通网络脆弱性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(11): 2276-2283.
[5] Ma, F., Shi, W., Yuen, F., et al. (2020) Exploring the Robustness of Public Transportation for Sustainable Cities: A Double-Layered Network Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, Article ID: 121747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Yin, D., Huang, W., Shuai, B., et al. (2022) Structural Characteristics Analysis and Cascading Failure Impact Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Network: From the Perspective of Multi-Layer Network. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 218, Article ID: 108161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 杨景峰, 朱大鹏, 赵瑞琳. 城市轨道交通网络特性与级联失效鲁棒性分析[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2022, 58(7): 250-258.
[8] 焦柳丹, 罗敏, 谌微微, 等. 基于复杂网络和VIKOR的城市轨道交通网络站点重要度研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 41(10): 16-25.
[9] 涂敏, 韩雨濛. 改进TOPSIS法的武汉城市轨道交通节点重要度评估[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 42(9): 113-121.
[10] 明玮. 城市轨道交通网络重点车站辨识及连通可靠性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.
[11] 沈型广. 城市轨道交通网络重要车站辨识及可靠性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2022.
[12] Brin, S. and Page, L. (1998) The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30,107-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 窦炳琳, 张世永. 复杂网络上级联失效的负载容量模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2011, 23 (7): 1459-1463 1468.
[14] Wang, J. and Rong, L. (2009) A Model for Cascading Failures in Scale-Free Networks with a Breakdown Probability. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388, 1289-1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Motter, A.E. and Lai, Y.C. (2002) Cascade-Based Attacks on Complex Networks. Physical Review E: Statistical, Non-Linear, and Soft Matter Physics, 66, Article ID: 065102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef