高强度聚焦超声消融术与子宫动脉栓塞术预处理剖宫产瘢痕妊娠临床疗效对比
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation versus Uterine Artery Embolization for the Pretreatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
摘要: 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)是指妊娠过程中胚胎种植于子宫剖宫产瘢痕处的一种疾病,为异位妊娠的一种特殊类型,我国发病率逐年升高。如未及时诊治或错误诊治,可能导致不可控的子宫大出血、子宫破裂等并发症,必要时可能切除子宫,严重威胁患者生命及生活质量。早诊断后早治疗对其治疗有重要意义。CSP的治疗以手术治疗为主,但目前对最佳治疗方式尚无统一定论。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)或子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)在手术前预处理病灶可有效减少术中出血,改善预后。本文旨在对清宫术联合HIFU或UAE预处理治疗CSP的治疗效果进行综述。以期对临床治疗提供参考。
Abstract: Cesarean section scar pregnancy (CSP) refers to a disease in which the embryo is implanted in the uterine cesarean section scar during pregnancy, which is a special type of ectopic pregnancy, and the incidence rate in China is increasing year by year. If it is not diagnosed and treated in time or incorrectly, it may lead to uncontrollable complications such as uterine bleeding and uterine rupture, and the uterus may be removed if necessary, which seriously threatens the patient’s life and quality of life. Early diagnosis and accurate diagnosis are important for its treatment. Surgery is the main treatment for CSP, but there is no consensus on the best treatment modality. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or uterine artery embolization (UAE) can effectively reduce intraoperative bleeding and improve prognosis by pretreating the lesion before surgery. The purpose of this article is to review the therapeutic effect of uterine evacuation combined with HIFU or UAE pretreatment in the treatment of CSP, in order to provide a reference for clinical treatment.
文章引用:朱虹雨, 马俊旗. 高强度聚焦超声消融术与子宫动脉栓塞术预处理剖宫产瘢痕妊娠临床疗效对比[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 1565-1570. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.143880

参考文献

[1] 金力, 范光升, 郎景和. 剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J]. 生殖与避孕, 2005(10): 630-634.
[2] 欧阳振波, 钟碧婷, 张艺, 等. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的治疗进展[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2018, 27(8): 622-624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 钟碧婷, 吴嘉雯, 欧阳振波, 等. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的分型及其与治疗的相关性[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2020, 29(1): 68-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Yin, S., Chen, L., Zhou, Y., et al. (2023) Evaluation of Cesarean Rates for Term, Singleton, Live Vertex Deliveries in China in 2020 among Women with No Prior Cesarean Delivery. JAMA Network Open, 6, e234521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 欧阳振波, 苏欢欢, 张秋实, 等. 复发性剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠一例报告并文献复习[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014(4): 298-299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Liu, Y., Wang, L. and Zhu, X. (2023) Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 30, 446-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 金力, 陈蔚琳, 周应芳. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016) [J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2017, 15(1): 5-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Shawki, Y.O. (2020) Hysteroscopic Management of Cesarian Scar Ectopic Pregnancy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 27, S119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Yang, Q., Piao, S., Wang, G., Wang, Y. and Liu, C. (2009) Hysteroscopic Surgery of Ectopic Pregnancy in the Cesarean Section Scar. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 16, 432-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Qiao, B., Zhang, Z. and Li, Y. (2016) Uterine Artery Embolization versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 23, 1040-1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 张小娟. UAE联合人流术与宫腹腔镜联合术治疗II型剖宫产术后CSP的疗效比较[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2022, 33(9): 1364-1366.
[12] Healey, S., Buzaglo, K., Seti, L., et al. (2004) Ovarian Function after Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysterectomy. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 11, 348-352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Hovsepian, D.M., Ratts, V.S., Rodriguez, M., et al. (2006) A Prospective Comparison of the Impact of Uterine Artery Embolization, Myomectomy, and Hysterectomy on Ovarian Function. Journal of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, 17, 1111-1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Xiao, X., Feng, Z., Li, T., et al. (2019) Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis. Advances in Therapy, 36, 1314-1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Kim, C., et al. (2016) The Effects of Uterine Artery Embolization on Ovarian Reserve. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal, 206, 172-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 张莉, 高巍, 任熙, 等. 子宫动脉栓塞术治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的疗效及对卵巢功能的影响[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2016, 22(7): 689-691 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Izadifar, Z., Izadifar, Z., Chapman, D., et al. (2020) An Introduction to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Systematic Review on Principles, Devices, and Clinical Applications. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 9, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 宋兆丽, 史小荣. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊疗进展[J]. 安徽医学, 2022, 43(4): 482-486.
[19] Haar, G.T. and Coussios, C. (2007) High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Physical Principles and Devices. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 23, 89-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 熊光武. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗方法选择[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(9): 769-775.
[21] 林振江, 袁利, 刘颂, 等. 高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞辅助负压吸宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的有效性和安全性比较[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020, 36(4): 365-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Liu, Y., Zhang, W.W., He, M., Gong, C., Xie, B., Wen, X., Li, D. and Zhang, L. (2018) Adverse Effect Analysis of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Benign Uterine Diseases. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 35, 56-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 于丽霞, 徐琳瑛. 高强度聚焦超声联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统对子宫腺肌病患者血清CA125、抗子宫内膜抗体、血红蛋白及卵巢功能的影响[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2019, 11(4): 33-36.
[24] Yang, X., Zhang, X., Lin, B., Feng, X. and Aili, A. (2019) Combined Therapeutic Effects of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for the Treatment of Severe Adenomyosis. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 36, 486-492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 林琼燕, 郝世辉, 谭琳, 等. 高强度超声聚焦对剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的治疗效果[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2019, 8(2): 116-120.
[26] 王巧菊. 高强度聚焦超声联合清宫术在治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠中的临床应用[J]. 哈尔滨医药, 2019, 39(2): 116-117.
[27] 楚光华, 刘晨, 胡春艳, 等. 高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞术辅助治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床效果比较[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(5): 547-552.
[28] 魏杏茹, 高艳华, 董巍巍, 等. 高强度聚焦超声消融治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠的疗效[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2017, 38(11): 1040-1042 1046.
[29] 代倩苓, 郑艾, 王薇, 等. 高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞介入术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的前瞻性对照研究[J]. 华西医学, 2017, 32(5): 723-726.
[30] Chen, L., Xiao, S., Zhu, X., He, S. and Xue, M. (2019) Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 26, 883-890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 欧阳振波, 罗凤军, 钟碧婷, 等. 美国母胎医学会关于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠指南的解读[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2021, 30(1): 54-57 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef