家庭功能对青少年网络成瘾的影响：情绪调节策略的调节作用
The Effect of Family Functioning on Internet Addiction in Adolescents: Moderating Role of Emotion Regulation Strategies
摘要: 目的：探讨青少年家庭功能特点与网络成瘾的关系，以及情绪调节策略在这两者之间的调节作用。方法：采用家庭功能评定量表、中文网络成瘾量表修订版和情绪调节量表对917名学生16~18岁的学生进行调查。结果：1) 青少年家庭功能与网络成瘾呈显著正相关，家庭功能评分越低表示状况越好，网络成瘾越低；2) 家庭功能与情绪调节策略之间呈显著相关，其中，与认知重评呈显著负相关，与表达抑制呈显著正相关；3) 认知重评与网络成瘾呈显著负相关，而与表达抑制的相关不显著；4) 情绪调节策略在家庭功能和网络成瘾关系中具有调节作用。结论：家庭功能对青少年网络成瘾存在显著的影响，且这一影响受到情绪调节策略的调节。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between family functioning and Internet addiction, and the moderating role of emotion regulation strategies. Methods: A total of 917 adolescents aged 16~18 years old were investigated by using Family Assessment Device, Chinese Internet Addiction Scale Revision and Emotion Regulation Scale. Results: 1) There was significantly positively correlated between family functioning and Internet addiction, with lower family functioning scores indicating better status and lower Internet addiction; 2) Family functioning had a significant predictive effect on emotion regulation, which had a significant negative predictive effect on cognitive reappraisal and a significant positive predictive effect on expressive suppression; 3) Cognitive reappraisal had a significant negative predictive effect on Internet addiction, whereas the predictive effect of expressive suppression was not significant; 4) Emotion regulation strategies have a moderating role in the relationship between family functioning and Internet addiction. Conclusion: Adolescents’ family function has a significant predictive effect on Internet addiction, which is moderated by emotion regulation strategies.
文章引用：蔡鑫婷 (2024). 家庭功能对青少年网络成瘾的影响：情绪调节策略的调节作用. 心理学进展, 14(3), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.143170

参考文献

[1] 卞宏毅, 刘缨, 李宁, 刘天威(2016). 青少年网络成瘾率的Meta分析. 中国学校卫生, 37(1), 67-70.
[2] 陈淑慧, 翁俪祯, 苏逸人, 吴和懋, 杨品鳯(2003). 中文网路成瘾量表之编制与心理计量特性研究. 中华心理学刊, 45(3), 279-294.
[3] 高文斌, 陈祉妍(2006). 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 596-603.
[4] 赖雪芬, 王艳辉, 王媛媛, 张卫, 杨庆平(2014). 父母控制与青少年网络成瘾: 情绪调节的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(3), 437-441.
[5] 李海彤, 杜亚松, 江文庆, 王玉凤(2006). 上海市中学生网络过度使用与家庭功能关系的研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 14(6), 627-628, 631.
[6] 李荣风, 徐夫真, 纪林芹, 张文新(2013). 家庭功能评定量表的初步修订. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(7), 996-1000.
[7] 刘凤娥, 张锦涛, 周楠, 李晓敏, 方晓义(2017). 大学生家庭功能与网络成瘾的关系: 应对方式的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, (2), 90-96.
[8] 刘静, 刘文娟, 赵娜(2017). 家庭功能对中学生网络成瘾现况影响的Meta分析. 中国健康教育, 33(4), 349-353.
[9] 王力, 柳恒超, 李中权, 杜卫(2007). 情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 15(6), 503-505.
[10] 王小运, 伍安春(2012). 大学生手机成瘾行为的成因及其对策. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 24(1), 40-43, 63.
[11] 颜剑雄, 程建伟, 李路荣(2015). 高中生网络成瘾倾向与家庭功能的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, (1), 106-108.
[12] 杨青, 罗洁如(2016). 青少年家庭功能的特点及其对网络行为的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, (6), 850-855.
[13] 袁加锦, 龙泉杉, 丁南翔, 娄熠雪, 刘莹莹, 杨洁敏(2014). 负性情绪调节的效率: 中国文化背景下认知重评与表达抑制的对比. 中国科学: 生命科学, 44(6), 602-613.
[14] 张惠敏, 宁丽, 陶然, 刘彩谊(2012). 网瘾青少年所在家庭的家庭功能状况探析. 中国药物依赖性杂志, 21(4), 307-311.
[15] 张锦涛, 陈超, 刘凤娥, 邓林园, 方晓义(2012). 同伴网络过度使用行为和态度、网络使用同伴压力与大学生网络成瘾的关系. 心理发展与教育, 28(6), 634-640.
[16] 张锦涛, 刘勤学, 邓林园, 方晓义, 刘朝莹, 兰菁(2011). 青少年亲子关系与网络成瘾: 孤独感的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 641-647.
[17] Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-Regulation Strategies across Psychopathology: A Meta-Analytic Review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 217-237.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Baker, T. B., Piper, M. E., Mccarthy, D. E., Majeskie, M. R., & Fiore, M. C. (2004). Addiction Motivation Reformulated: An Affective Processing Model of Negative Reinforcement. Psychological Review, 111, 33-51.[CrossRef] 
[19] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[20] Gross, J. J. (1998). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271-299.[CrossRef] 
[21] Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1-26.[CrossRef] 
[22] Gross, J. J. (2017). Antecedent-and Response-Focused Emotion Regulation: Divergent Consequences for Experience, Expression, and Physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224-237.
[23] Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Hofmann, S. G., Heering, S., Sawyer, A. T., & Asnaani, A. (2009). How to Handle Anxiety: The Effects of Reappraisal, Acceptance, and Suppression Strategies on Anxious Arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 389-394.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., Nakagawa, S., & Multinational Study of Cultural Display Rules (2008). Culture, Emotion Regulation, and Adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 925-937.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Miller, I. W., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Keitner, G. I. (1985). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 345-356.[CrossRef] 
[27] Miller, I. W., Kabacoff, R. I., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Spuy, H. I. V. D. (1994). The Development of a Clinical Rating Scale the McMaster Model of Family Functioning. Family Process, 33, 53-69.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Murata, A., Moser, J. S., & Kitayama, S. (2012). Culture Shapes Electrocortical Responses during Emotion Suppression. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 595-601.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Soto, J. A., Perez, C. R., Kim, Y. H., Lee, E. A., & Minnick, M. R. (2011). Is Expressive Suppression Always Associated with Poorer Psychological Functioning? A Cross-Cultural Comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11, 1450-1455.
[30] Trommsdorff, G., & Rothbaum, F. (2009). Development of Emotion Regulation in Cultural Context. In M. Vandekerckhove et al. (Eds.), Regulating Emotions: Culture, Social Necessity, and Biological Inheritance (pp. 83-120). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.[CrossRef] 
[31] Williams, L. J., Edwards, J. R., & Vand-Enberg, R. J. (2003). Recent Advances In Causal Modeling Methods for Organizational and Management Research. Journal of Management, 29, 903-936.[CrossRef] 
[32] Yeung, D. Y., & Fung, H. H. (2012). Impacts of Suppression on Emotional Responses and Performance Outcomes: An Experience-Sampling Study in Younger and Older Workers. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 67, 666-676.[CrossRef] [PubMed]