宿州芦岭矿区浅层地下水化学特征及成因分析
Chemical Characteristics and Genesis of Shallow Groundwater in the Luling Mining Area, Suzhou
DOI: 10.12677/ojns.2024.122040, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李田田, 闵 宁*, 蒋家沁:宿州学院资源与土木工程学院,安徽 宿州
关键词: 地下水水化学特征成因分析Groundwater Hydrochemical Characteristics Causal Analysis
摘要: 文章以宿州芦岭矿区浅层地下水为研究对象,结合统计分析、Piper三线图、Gibbs图和离子比例系数的方法分析研究区浅层地下水的水化学特性征及其成因,并开展了浅层地下水质量评价。结果表明:该区域浅层地下水pH均值为7.52,整体上属于偏弱碱性环境,TDS值介于397~933 mg/L,平均值为613 mg/L,属于淡水。水体阳离子以Na ,Mg2 为主,阴离子主要为HCO3-。水化学类型共有4种,分别为Mg-Na-Ca-HCO3型、Na-Mg-Ca-HCO3型、Na-Mg-HCO3型和Na-Mg-HCO3-Cl型。浅层地下水水化学特征的主要受岩石风化作用的影响,Na 和Cl主要来源于岩盐溶解,Ca2 及Mg2 主要受碳酸盐的溶解。通过对水质进行评估,可以确定研究区的水质基本适合饮用,该区浅层地下水如果作为灌溉用水会给土壤或者作物带来中等程度的碱害风险。
Abstract: The article takes the shallow groundwater in the Luling mining area of Suzhou as the research object, and analyses the hydrochemical characteristics and causes of the shallow groundwater in the study area by combining statistical analysis, Piper’s trilinear diagram, Gibbs’ diagram and ionic scale coefficient, and carries out the evaluation of the quality of the shallow groundwater. The results show that the pH of the shallow groundwater in the area is 7.52, which is a weakly alkaline environment overall. The water cations are mainly Na and Mg2 , while the anions are mainly HCO3-. There are four types of water chemistry, namely Mg-Na-Ca-HCO3 type, Na-Mg-Ca-HCO3 type, Na-Mg-HCO3 type and Na-Mg-HCO3-Cl type. The water chemistry of shallow groundwater is mainly influenced by rock weathering, with Na and Cl mainly derived from rock salt dissolution, and Ca2 and Mg2 mainly from carbonate dissolution. The assessment of the water quality has determined that the study area is generally suitable for drinking and that the shallow groundwater in the area poses a moderate risk of alkali damage to soil or crops if used as irrigation water.
文章引用:李田田, 闵宁, 蒋家沁. 宿州芦岭矿区浅层地下水化学特征及成因分析[J]. 自然科学, 2024, 12(2): 343-350. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojns.2024.122040

参考文献

[1] 刘俊萍. 地下水环境保护与防治建议研究[J]. 皮革制作与环保科技, 2022, 3(17): 86-88.
[2] 王润涛, 钱家忠, 王宿轩, 马海春, 王小勇. 南淝河下游浅层地下水水化学特征及成因分析[J/OL]. 现代地质: 1-10. 2023-10-25.[CrossRef
[3] 李巧, 周金龙, 高业新, 等. 新疆玛纳斯河流域平原区地下水水文地球化学特征研究[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(2): 238-244.
[4] 闵宁, 任瑾, 林曼利. 淮北平原区城市浅层地下水化学特征及成因分析: 以宿州市为例[J]. 九江学院学报(自然科学版), 2018, 33(1): 14-17.
[5] 高帅, 李常锁, 贾超, 等. 济南趵突泉泉域岩溶水化学特征时空差异性研究[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(S1): 61-70.
[6] 高坛光, 康世昌, 张强弓, 等. 青藏高原纳木错流域河水主要离子化学特征及来源[J]. 环境科学, 2008, 29(11): 3009-3016.
[7] Edmunds, W.M., Ma, J., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., et al. (2006) Groundwater Recharge History and Hydrogeochemical Evolution in the Minqin Basin, North West China. Applied Geochemistry, 21, 2148-2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Apollaro, C., Fuoco, I., Bloise, L., et al. (2021) Geochemical Modeling of Water-Rock Interaction Processes in the Pollino National Park. Geofluids, 2021, Article ID: 6655711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Fuoco, I., Apollaro, C., Criscuoli, A., et al. (2021) Fluoride Polluted Groundwaters in Calabria Region (Southern Italy): Natural Source and Remediation. Water, 13, Article No. 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhang, B., Zhao, D., Zhou, P., et al. (2020) Hydrochemical Characteristics of Groundwater and Dominant Water-Rock Interactions in the Delingha Area, Qaidam Basin, Northwest China. Water, 12, Article No. 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 刘凯旋, 刘启蒙, 柴辉婵, 等. 孙疃矿区地下水化学特征及其控制因素研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2019, 51(4): 74-79.
[12] 刘德玉, 贾贵义, 张伟, 等. 甘肃敦煌地区疏勒河尾闾区地下水化学特征及成因分析[J]. 地质论评, 2022, 68(1): 181-194.
[13] 卢丽, 陈余道, 邹胜章, 等. 岩溶区典型工业型城市地下水水化学特征及成因机制[J]. 中国岩溶, 2022, 41(4): 588-598.
[14] Guo, Y.L., Zhang, C., Xian, Q., et al. (2020) Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of a Closed Karst Groundwater Basin in North China. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 325, 365-379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 金银龙, 鄂学礼, 陈昌杰, 等. GB 5749-2006. 生活饮用水卫生标准[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社出版, 2006.
[16] 谢菲. 泾惠渠灌区地下水水质对不同水源灌溉的响应及评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.