临床角膜生物力学测量方法的研究进展
Research Progress on Clinical Measurements of Corneal Biomechanics
摘要: 角膜为黏弹性生物组织,具有非线性、各向异性和粘弹性等复杂的生物力学性能,并受到角膜厚度、眼压、角膜曲率、角膜水合状态等多种因素影响。随着基础和临床研究的不断深入,角膜生物力学的活体测量在眼部疾病的诊疗中发挥着越来越重要的作用,如屈光手术术前评估、扩张性角膜病的诊断、随访及治疗效果的评估,青光眼的随访等。随着临床需求的不断扩大,活体角膜生物力学测量技术在近十几年取得显著的发展,技术的进步产生更多的方法和参数来表征角膜的生物力学特性。本文将对目前临床角膜生物力学测量方法最新进展进行综述,以期帮助实现角膜生物力学的更多临床应用,有助于个性化的诊疗和临床决策。
Abstract: The cornea is a viscoelastic biological tissue with nonlinear, anisotropic, and viscoelastic complex biomechanical properties. It is influenced by factors including corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, corneal curvature, and corneal hydration state. With the deepening understanding of basic and clinical research, in vivo measurements of corneal biomechanics are playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and treatment of ocular diseases. Such measurements are useful in surgical planning for refractive procedures, diagnosis and monitoring of keratoconus evaluation of treatment efficacy, and follow-up of glaucoma cases, among other applications. Driven by growing clinical demand, significant progress has been made in the development of devices and technologies for in vivo assessment of corneal biomechanics over the past decade. These technological advancements have enabled more methods and parameters to characterize corneal biomechanical properties. This review summarizes the latest advances in clinical measurement methods of corneal biomechanics to facilitate wider clinical applications and provide guidance for personalized diagnostics, treatment, and clinical decision-making.
文章引用:何鸣, 杜之渝. 临床角膜生物力学测量方法的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 1973-1979. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.143931

参考文献

[1] Elsheikh, A., Wang, D. and Pye, D. (2007) Determination of the Modulus of Elasticity of the Human Cornea. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 23, 808-818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Boyce, B.L., Grazier, J.M., Jones, R.E., et al. (2008) Full-Field Deformation of Bovine Cornea under Constrained Inflation Conditions. Biomaterials, 29, 3896-3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Zhao, Y., Hu, G., Yan, Y., et al. (2022) Biomechanical Analysis of Ocular Diseases and Its in Vitro Study Methods. Biomedical Engineering Online, 21, Article No. 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Li, F., Wang, K. and Liu, Z. (2023) In Vivo Biomechanical Measurements of the Cornea. Bioengineering, 10, Article 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Luce, D.A. (2005) Determining in Vivo Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea with an Ocular Response Analyzer. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 31, 156-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Qin, X., Yu, M., Zhang, H., et al. (2019) The Mechanical Interpretation of Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters. BioMed Research International, 2019, Article ID: 5701236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Hallahan, K.M., Sinha Roy, A., Ambrosio Jr., R., et al. (2014) Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Keratoconus. Ophthalmology, 121, 459-468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Fontes, B.M., Ambrosio Jr., R., Jardim, D., et al. (2010) Corneal Biomechanical Metrics and Anterior Segment Parameters in Mild Keratoconus. Ophthalmology, 117, 673-679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Luz, A., Lopes, B., Hallahan, K.M., et al. (2016) Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 32, 479-494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Yang, K., Xu, L., Fan, Q., et al. (2020) Association between Corneal Stiffness Parameter at the First Applanation and Keratoconus Severity. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Article ID: 6667507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Qassim, A., Mullany, S., Abedi, F., et al. (2021) Corneal Stiffness Parameters Are Predictive of Structural and Functional Progression in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes. Ophthalmology, 128, 993-1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Vinciguerra, R., Ambrosio Jr., R., Elsheikh, A., et al. (2016) Detection of Keratoconus with a New Biomechanical Index. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 32, 803-810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Herber, R., Hasanli, A., Lenk, J., et al. (2022) Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 38, 364-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Eliasy, A., Chen, K.J., Vinciguerra, R., et al. (2019) Determination of Corneal Biomechanical Behavior In-Vivo for Healthy Eyes Using CorVis ST Tonometry: Stress-Strain Index. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, Article 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Miao, Y., Ma, X., Qu, Z., et al. (2023) Performance of Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 258, 196-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Sedaghat, M.R., Momeni-Moghaddam, H., Heravian, J., et al. (2023) Detection Ability of Corneal Biomechanical Parameters for Early Diagnosis of Ectasia. Eye, 37, 1665-1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Ambrosio Jr., R., Lopes, B.T., Faria-Correia, F., et al. (2017) Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 33, 434-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Liu, Y., Zhang, Y. and Chen, Y. (2021) Application of a Scheimpflug-Based Biomechanical Analyser and Tomography in the Early Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus in Chinese Patients. BMC Ophthalmology, 21, Article No. 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Prevedel, R., Diz-Munoz, A., Ruocco, G. and Antonacci, G. (2019) Brillouin Microscopy: An Emerging Tool for Mechanobiology. Nature Methods, 16, 969-977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Scarcelli, G., Kim, P. and Yun, S.H. (2011) In Vivo Measurement of Age-Related Stiffening in the Crystalline Lens by Brillouin Optical Microscopy. Biophysical Journal, 101, 1539-1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Scarcelli, G. and Yun, S.H. (2012) In Vivo Brillouin Optical Microscopy of the Human Eye. Optics Express, 20, 9197-9202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Shao, P., Eltony, A.M., Seiler, T.G., et al. (2019) Spatially-Resolved Brillouin Spectroscopy Reveals Biomechanical Abnormalities in Mild to Advanced Keratoconus in Vivo. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 7467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Eltony, A.M., Shao, P. and Yun, S.H. (2022) Measuring Mechanical Anisotropy of the Cornea with Brillouin Microscopy. Nature Communications, 13, Article No. 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Lan, G., Twa, M.D., Song, C., et al. (2023) In Vivo Corneal Elastography: A Topical Review of Challenges and Opportunities. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 21, 2664-2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Schmitt, J. (1998) OCT Elastography: Imaging Microscopic Deformation and Strain of Tissue. Optics Express, 3, 199-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Zaitsev, V.Y., Matveyev, A.L., Matveev, L.A., et al. (2021) Strain and Elasticity Imaging in Compression Optical Coherence Elastography: The Two-Decade Perspective and Recent Advances. Journal of Biophotonics, 14, e202000257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Ferguson, T.J., Singuri, S., Jalaj, S., et al. (2021) Depth-Resolved Corneal Biomechanical Changes Measured via Optical Coherence Elastography Following Corneal Crosslinking. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 10, Article 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Nair, A., Singh, M., Aglyamov, S., et al. (2021) Heartbeat Optical Coherence Elastography: Corneal Biomechanics in Vivo. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 26, Article ID: 020502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Zvietcovich, F., Pongchalee, P., Meemon, P., et al. (2019) Reverberant 3D Optical Coherence Elastography Maps the Elasticity of Individual Corneal Layers. Nature Communications, 10, Article No. 4895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Ge, G.R., Tavakol, B., Usher, D.B., et al. (2022) Assessing Corneal Cross-Linking with Reverberant 3D Optical Coherence Elastography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 27, Article ID: 026003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Tanter, M., Touboul, D., Gennisson, J.L., et al. (2009) High-Resolution Quantitative Imaging of Cornea Elasticity Using Supersonic Shear Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 28, 1881-1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Nguyen, T.M., Aubry, J.F., Fink, M., et al. (2014) In Vivo Evidence of Porcine Cornea Anisotropy Using Supersonic Shear Wave Imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 55, 7545-7552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Shih, C.C., Qian, X., Ma, T., et al. (2018) Quantitative Assessment of Thin-Layer Tissue Viscoelastic Properties Using Ultrasonic Micro-Elastography with Lamb Wave Model. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 37, 1887-1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Vakoc, B.J., Tearney, G.J. and Bouma, B.E. (2009) Statistical Properties of Phase-Decorrelation in Phase-Resolved Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 28, 814-821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Blackburn, B.J., Gu, S., Ford, M.R., et al. (2019) Noninvasive Assessment of Corneal Crosslinking with Phase-Decorrelation Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 60, 41-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]