性别系统合理化与受害者指责：敌意、善意性别偏见的中介作用
Gender System Justification and Victim Blaming: The Mediating Role of Hostile Sexism and Benevolent Sexism
摘要: 当前我国强奸犯罪呈现熟人化趋势，熟人强奸受害者往往面临着更为负面的社会评价，例如更大的受害者指责；这给受害者带来了严重的二次创伤。鉴于国内有关强奸受害者指责研究的匮乏，本研究调查了观察者所持有的性别系统合理化信念、敌意与善意性别偏见对熟人强奸中的受害者指责的影响，并检验了敌意、善意性别偏见在性别系统合理化与受害者指责之间的并行中介作用。在网络调研平台招募了510名成年参与者，每名参与者阅读了一份描述熟人强奸情境的材料，并完成了后续的测量。结果表明：1) 性别系统合理化、敌意和善意性别偏见均正向预测受害者指责；2) 性别系统合理化对受害者指责的预测效应在女性中更强；3) 敌意和善意性别偏见在性别系统合理化与受害者指责之间的起并行中介作用。
Abstract: The rape crime in our country shows the trend of acquaintance-oriented, and the acquaintance rape victims often face more negative social reaction, such as greater victim blaming which caused severe secondary trauma to the victim. In view of the paucity of domestic research on rape victim blaming, current study investigated the influence of gender system justification, hostile sexism and benevolent sexism held by observers on victim-blaming among acquaintance rape, and examined the parallel mediating role of hostile and benevolent sexism in the relationship between gender system justification and victim blaming. A total of 510 adult participants were recruited through an online research platform. Each participant read a vignette describing an acquaintance rape situation and completed a follow-up measurement. The results showed that: 1) Gender system justification, hostile sexism and benevolent sexism all positively predicted victim blaming; 2) The predictive effect of gender system justification on victim-blaming is stronger in women; 3) Hostile sexism and benevolent sexism mediated the relationship between gender system justification and victim-blaming.
文章引用：朱慧 (2024). 性别系统合理化与受害者指责：敌意、善意性别偏见的中介作用. 心理学进展, 14(3), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.143177

参考文献

[1] 曹国华, 黄晖, 俞庶言(2023). 熟人间非暴力型强奸案件的证据审查要点. 中国检察官, (4), 32-36.
[2] 中国司法大数据研究院(2017). 司法大数据专题报告之性侵类犯罪.
https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu-xiangqing-63182.html
[3] Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of Stranger and Acquaintance Rape: The Role of Benevolent and Hostile Sexism in Victim Blame and Rape Proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Angelone, D. J., Mitchell, D., & Smith, D. (2018). The Influence of Gender Ideology, Victim Resistance, and Spiking a Drink on Acquaintance Rape Attributions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 3186-3210.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Bahamondes, J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019). “We Look (And Feel) Better through System-Justifying Lenses”: System-Justifying Beliefs Attenuate the Well-Being Gap between the Advantaged and Disadvantaged by Reducing Perceptions of Discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1391-1408.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Bareket, O., & Fiske, S. T. (2023). A Systematic Review of the Ambivalent Sexism Literature: Hostile Sexism Protects Men’s Power; Benevolent Sexism Guards Traditional Gender Roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149, 637-698.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Bieneck, S., & Krahé, B. (2011). Blaming the Victim and Exonerating the Perpetrator in Cases of Rape and Robbery: Is There a Double Standard? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1785-1797.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2014). A System Justification View of Sexual Violence: Legitimizing Gender Inequality and Reduced Moral Outrage Are Connected to Greater Rape Myth Acceptance. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 15, 204-218.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] De Keersmaecker, J., & Roets, A. (2020). All Victims Are Equally Innocent, but Some Are More Innocent than Others: The Role of Group Membership on Victim Blaming. Current Psychology, 39, 254-262.[CrossRef] 
[10] Duckitt, J. (2001). A Dual-Process Cognitive-Motivational Theory of Ideology and Prejudice. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). Academic Press.[CrossRef] 
[11] Eigenberg, H., & Garland, T. (2008). Victim Blaming. In L. Moriarty, Controversies in Victimology (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[12] Friis-Rødel, A. M., Leth, P. M., & Astrup, B. S. (2021). Stranger Rape; Distinctions between the Typical Rape Type and Other Types of Rape. A Study Based on Data from Center for Victims of Sexual Assault. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 80, Article 102159.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B. et al. (2000). Beyond Prejudice as Simple Antipathy: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism across Cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.[CrossRef] 
[14] Gravelin, C. R., Biernat, M., & Bucher, C. E. (2019). Blaming the Victim of Acquaintance Rape: Individual, Situational, and Sociocultural Factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2422.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Grubb, A., & Harrower, J. (2008). Attribution of Blame in Cases of Rape: An Analysis of Participant Gender, Type of Rape and Perceived Similarity to the Victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 396-405.[CrossRef] 
[16] Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of Blame in Rape Cases: A Review of the Impact of Rape Myth Acceptance, Gender Role Conformity and Substance Use on Victim Blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 443-452.[CrossRef] 
[17] Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the Powerless: Effects of Legitimate and Illegitimate Explanation on Affect, Memory, and Stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219-236.[CrossRef] 
[18] Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: Third Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
https://www.guilford.com/books/introduction-to-mediation-moderation-and-conditional-process-analysis/andrew-hayes/9781462549030
[19] Hennes, E. P., Ruisch, B. C., Feygina, I., Monteiro, C. A., & Jost, J. T. (2016). Motivated Recall in the Service of the Economic System: The Case of Anthropogenic Climate Change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 755-771.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The Role of Stereotyping in System-Justification and the Production of False Consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.[CrossRef] 
[21] Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to Benevolent Sexism and Complementary Gender Stereotypes: Consequences for Specific and Diffuse Forms of System Justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.[CrossRef] 
[23] Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Jost, J. T., & Pohl, M. J. (2011). Working for the System: Motivated Defense of Meritocratic Beliefs. Social Cognition, 29, 322-340.[CrossRef] 
[24] Łyś, A. E., Studzińska, A., & Bargiel-Matusiewicz, K. (2021). Beliefs on Sexual Violence in the Context of System Justification Theory: The Role of Hostile Sexism and Beliefs in Biological Origins of Gender Differences. Social Justice Research, 34, 235-254.[CrossRef] 
[25] Martini, M., & De Piccoli, N. (2020). Predicting Bystander Intention to Intervene: The Role of Gender-Specific System Justification and Rape Myth Acceptance for Men and Women. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 326.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Masser, B., Lee, K., & McKimmie, B. M. (2010). Bad Woman, Bad Victim? Disentangling the Effects of Victim Stereotypicality, Gender Stereotypicality and Benevolent Sexism on Acquaintance Rape Victim Blame. Sex Roles, 62, 494-504.[CrossRef] 
[27] Papp, L. J., & Erchull, M. J. (2017). Objectification and System Justification Impact Rape Avoidance Behaviors. Sex Roles, 76, 110-120.[CrossRef] 
[28] Persson, S., Dhingra, K., & Grogan, S. (2018). Attributions of Victim Blame in Stranger and Acquaintance Rape: A Quantitative Study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27, 2640-2649.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of Reliable and Valid Short Forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.[CrossRef] 
[30] Schmader, T., Major, B., Eccleston, C. P., & McCoy, S. K. (2001). Devaluing Domains in Response to Threatening Intergroup Comparisons: Perceived Legitimacy and the Status Value Asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782-796.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Ståhl, T., Eek, D., & Kazemi, A. (2010). Rape Victim Blaming as System Justification: The Role of Gender and Activation of Complementary Stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23, 239-258.[CrossRef] 
[32] Yamawaki, N., Darby, R., & Queiroz, A. (2007). The Moderating Role of Ambivalent Sexism: The Influence of Power Status on Perception of Rape Victim and Rapist. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 41-56.[CrossRef]