基于VMD-TCN的太阳活动指数F10.7的短期预报
Short-Term Prediction of Solar Activity Factor F10.7 Based on VMD-TCN Model
DOI: 10.12677/ojns.2024.122052, PDF,   
作者: 王璐瑶:南京信息工程大学数学与统计学院,江苏 南京
关键词: F10.7预测VMD分解TCN模型F10.7 Variational Modal Decomposition Temporal Convolutional Networks
摘要: F10.7是波长为10.7 cm太阳辐射通量,它经常作为不同空间天气模型、大气密度经验模型中一个重要的参数输入,同时也是最广泛使用的衡量太阳活动水平强弱的参数之一,因此对其进行准确的预报是空间天气研究的一个重点关注的方向。本文利用1957~2019年观测的太阳辐射通量F10.7数据建立了基于VMD-TCN的F10.7预测模型,其中将1957~2008年作为模型训练集,2009~2019年作为模型的测试集,并使用留一法对数据集进行分组,进行多次交叉验证。实验结果表明:VMD-TCN模型预报F10.7的均方根误差1~4 sfu,平均绝对误差百分比为0~2 sfu,相关系数高达0.99。与基于相同数据集建模的其他模型如TCN,VMD-ELM模型相比,VMD-TCN模型预测F10.7的均方根误差更低,相关系数更高,模型综合预测效果最佳。
Abstract: F10.7 is the solar radiation flux with a wavelength of 10.7 cm, which is often used as an important parameter input in different space weather models, empirical models of atmospheric density, and is also one of the most widely used parameters to measure the strength of solar activity level, so its accurate forecasting is a key concern in space weather research. In this paper, a F10.7 prediction model based on VMD-TCN is established using the observed solar radiation flux F10.7 data from 1957~2019, in which 1957~2008 is taken as the training set of the model, and 2009~2019 as the test set of the model, and the datasets are grouped by using the leave-one-out method for multiple cross-validations. The experimental results show that the VMD-TCN model predicts F10.7 with the root mean square error of 1~4 sfu, the average absolute error percentage of 0~2 sfu, and the correlation coefficient is as high as 0.99. Compared with other models based on the same dataset, such as the TCN, VMD-ELM models, the VMD-TCN model predicts F10.7 with a lower root mean square error and a higher correlation coefficient, which gives the best overall prediction effect of the model.
文章引用:王璐瑶. 基于VMD-TCN的太阳活动指数F10.7的短期预报[J]. 自然科学, 2024, 12(2): 449-460. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojns.2024.122052

参考文献

[1] Tapping, K.F. (2013) The 10.7 cm Solar Radio Flux (F10.7). Space Weather, 11, 394-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Ortikov, M.Y., Shemelov, V.A., Shishigin, I.V. and Troitsky, B.V. (2003) Ionospheric Index of Solar Activity Based on the Data of Measurements of the Spacecraft Signals Characteristics. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 65, 1425-1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Huang, C. and Liu, D. (2009) Forecast Daily Indices of Solar Activity, F10.7, Using Support Vector Regression Method. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9, 694-702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Yaya, P., Hecker, L., Dudok, T., Fèvre, C. and Bruinsma, S. (2017) Solar Radio Proxies for Improved Satellite Orbit Prediction. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 7, Article No. A35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Tapping, K.F. and DeTracey, B. (1990) The Origin of the 10.7 cm Flux. Solar Physics, 127, 321-332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Swarup, G., Kakinuma, T., Covington, A.E., Harvey, G.A., Mullaly, R.F. and Rome, J. (1963) High Resolution Studies of Ten Solar Active Regions at Wavelengths of 3-21 cm. Astrophysical Journal, 137, Article No. 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Mordvinov, A.V. (1986) Prediction of Monthly Indices of Solar Activity F10.7 on the Basis of a Multiplicative Autoregression Model. 67-73.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986BSolD1985...67M/abstract
[8] Warren, H.P., Emmert, J.T. and Crump, N.A. (2017) Linear Forecasting of the F10.7 Proxy for Solar Activity. Space Weather, 15, 1039-1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Zhong, Q.Z., Liu, S.Q., He, J.X., et al. (2005) Application of Singular Spectrum Analysis to Solar 10.7 cm Radio Flux 27-day Forecast. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 25, 199-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Henney, C.J., Toussaint, W.A., White, S.M. and Arge, C.N. (2012) Forecasting F10.7 with Solar Magnetic Flux Transport Modeling. Space Weather, 10, S02011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Liu, C., Zhao, X., Chen, T. and Li, H. (2018) Predicting Short-Term F10.7 with Transport Models. Astrophysics and Space Science, 363, Article No. 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Yeates, A.R., Mackay, D.H. and van Ballegooijen, A.A. (2007) Modelling the Global Solar Corona: Filament Chirality Observations and Surface Simulations. Solar Physics, 245, 87-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Worden, J. and Harvey, J. (2000) An Evolving Synoptic Magnetic Flux map and Implications for the Distribution of Photospheric Magnetic Flux. Solar Physics, 195, 247-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Xiao, C., Cheng, G., Zhang, H., Rong, Z., Shen, C., Zhang, B. and Hu, H. (2017) Using Back Propagation Neural Network Method to Forecast Daily Indices of Solar Activity F10.7. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 37, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Luo, J., Zhu, H., Jiang, Y., Yang, J. and Huang, Y. (2020). The 10.7-cm Radio Flux Multistep Forecasting Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition and Back Propagation Neural Network. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 15, 584-592.[CrossRef
[16] Zhang, W., Zhao, X., Feng, X., Liu, C., Xiang, N., Li, Z. and Lu, W. (2022) Predicting the Daily 10.7-cm Solar Radio Flux Using the Long Short-Term Memory Method. Universe, 8, Article No. 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Lipton, Z.C., Berkowitz, J. and Elkan, C. (2015) A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00019
[18] Yang, H.J., Sun, Y.Q., Zhu, W., et al. (2021) Prediction Method of Dissolved Gas Concentration in Transformer Oil Based on CEEMD-TCN Model. Electronic Devices, 44, 887-892.
[19] Tanaka, H., Castelli, J.P., Covington, A.E., et al. (1973) Absolute Calibration of Solar Radio Flux Density in the Microwave Region. Solar Physics, 29, 243-262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Bai, S.J., Kolter, J.Z., Koltun, V., et al. (2018) An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01271
[21] Wu, X.W. (2009) Time Series Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate Methods. People’s University of China Press, Beijing.
[22] Zhao, H., Gallo, O., Frosio, I. and Kautz, J. (2017) Loss Functions for Image Restoration with Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 3, 47-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Du, Z.L. (2022) Forecasting the Daily 10.7 cm Solar Radio Flux Using an Autoregressive Model. Solar Physics, 295, Article No. 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef