膝关节翻修手术中干骺端骨缺损的重建与管理
Reconstruction and Management of Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty
摘要: 随着社会的发展,中国人口逐渐呈现出老龄化的现象,人工关节置换术的患者数量也逐渐增多。人工关节置换手术是目前治疗骨关节炎等导致膝关节疼痛、活动受限等疾病的可靠治疗方案。然而,某些患者因各种原因需要进行膝关节翻修手术,常见原因包括感染、松动或骨折等。但是因其手术复杂性,导致其预后和临床效果不如初次置换。再翻修往往会导致不同程度的骨缺损,是否妥善处理骨缺损往往决定着翻修手术成败与否。这不仅考验着手术医师的经验,还将影响患者膝关节的功能及稳定性,因此使得膝关节干骺端骨缺损的处理,日渐引起临床医师的重视,并且目前没有绝对治疗骨缺损的方案。如今重建骨缺损的目标在于达到膝关节稳定、恢复患者活动、功能正常。根据骨缺损的位置和大小,目前有很多重建措施,例如骨水泥、骨移植(自体骨移植、同种异体骨移植、打压骨移植、结构性同种异体骨移植)、金属增强模块、干骺端固定物(金属钽锥或干骺端袖套)、定制假体等。每种方式有不同的优缺点,重建前应详细制定手术计划及选择合适的假体,减少假体松动,增强假体稳定性及生存率,提高患者临床满意度。
Abstract: With the development of society, China’s population is gradually aging, and the number of patients undergoing artificial joint replacement is also gradually increasing. Artificial joint replacement surgery is currently a reliable treatment option for treating osteoarthritis and other diseases that cause knee joint pain and limited movement. However, some patients require revision knee surgery for a variety of reasons, including infection, loosening, or fracture. However, due to the complexity of the operation, its prognosis and clinical effect are not as good as those of primary surgery. Revision often leads to varying degrees of bone defects, and whether the bone defects are properly handled often determines the success or failure of the revision surgery. This not only tests the experience of the surgeon, but also affects the function and stability of the patient’s knee joint. Therefore, the treatment of metaphyseal bone defects in the knee joint has increasingly attracted the attention of clinicians, and there is currently no absolute treatment plan for bone defects. Today, the goal of reconstructing bone defects is to stabilize the knee joint and restore patient activity and normal function. Depending on the location and size of the bone defect, there are currently many reconstructive measures, such as bone cement, bone grafting (autograft, allograft, impact bone graft, structural allograft), metal reinforcement modules, metaphyseal End fixation (metal tantalum cone or metaphyseal sleeve), custom prosthesis, etc. Each method has different advantages and disadvantages. Before reconstruction, a detailed surgical plan and appropriate prosthesis selection should be made to reduce prosthesis loosening, enhance prosthesis stability and survival rate, and improve patient clinical satisfaction.
文章引用:阿吾扎尔·阿布都艾尼, 曹力. 膝关节翻修手术中干骺端骨缺损的重建与管理[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(3): 2254-2261. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.143970

参考文献

[1] Mancuso, F., Beltrame, A., Colombo, E., Miani, E. and Bassini, F. (2017) Management of Metaphyseal Bone Loss in Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Acta Biomedica, 88, 98-111.
[2] Haidukewych, G.J., Hanssen, A. and Jones, R.D. (2011) Metaphyseal Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Indications and Techniques. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 19, 311-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Daines, B.K. and Dennis, D.A. (2013) Management of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Instructional Course Lectures, 62, 341-348.
[4] Dalury, D.F., Pomeroy, D.L., Gorab, R.S. and Adams, M.J. (2013) Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Being Revised? The Journal of Arthroplasty, 28, 120-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Huff, T.W. and Sculco, T.P. (2007) Management of Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 22, 32-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Argenson, J.N., et al. (2019) Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Debridement and Retention of Implant: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34, S399-S419.
[7] Dennis, D.A., Berry, D.J., Engh, G., et al. (2008) Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 16, 442-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Hanna, S.A., Aston, W.J.S., De Roeck, N.J., Gough-Palmer, A. and Powles, D.P. (2011) Cementless Revision TKA with Bone Grafting of Osseous Defects Restores Bone Stock with a Low Revision Rate at 4 to 10 Years. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 469, 3164-3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Clatworthy, M. and Gross, A. (2003) Management of Bony Defects in Revision Total Knee Replacement. In: The Adult Knee, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 1455.
[10] Engh, G. (1997) Bone Defect Classification. In: Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 63-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Engh, G.A. and Ammeen, D.J. (1999) Bone Loss with Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Defect Classification and Alternatives for Reconstruction. Instructional Course Lectures, 48, 167-175.
[12] Vasso, M., Beaufils, P., Cerciello, S. and Schiavone, P.A. (2014) Bone Loss Following Knee Arthroplasty: Potential Treatment Options. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 134, 543-553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Fehring, T.K., Christie, M.J., Lavernia, C., Mason, J.B., McAuley, J.P., MacDonald, S.J., et al. (2008) Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Planning, Management, and Controversies. Instructional Course Lectures, 57, 341-363.
[14] Hockman, D.E., Ammeen, D. and Engh, G.A. (2005) Augments and Allografts in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Usage and Outcome Using One Modular Revision Prosthesis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 20, 35-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Persson, B.M. and Wouters, H.W. (1976) Curettage and Acrylic Cementation in Surgery of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 120, 125-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Persson, B.M., Ekelund, L., Lovdahl, R. and Gunterberg, B. (1984) Favourable Results of Acrylic Cementation for Giant Cell Tumors. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 55, 209-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lotke, P.A., Wong, R.Y. and Ecker, M.L. (1991) The Use of Methylmethacrylate in Primary Total Knee Replacements with Large Tibial Defects. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 270, 288-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Eldridge, J., Hubble, M., Nelson, K., Smith, E. and Learmonth, I. (1997) The Effect of Bone Chip Size on Initial Stability Following Femoral Impaction Grafting. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 79, S364.
[19] Bolder, S.B., Schreurs, B.W., Verdonschot, N., Van Unen, J.M., Gardeniers, J.W. and Slooff, T.J. (2003) Particle Size of Bone Graft and Method of Impaction Affect Initial Stability of Cemented Cups: Human Cadaveric and Synthetic Pelvic Specimen Studies. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 74, 652-657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Van Loon, C.J., De Waal Malefijt, M.C., Buma, P., et al. (2000) Autologous Morsellised Bone Grafting Restores Uncontained Femoral Bone Defects in Knee Arthroplasty. An in Vivo Study in Horses. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 82, 436-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Batmaz, A.G., Kayaalp, M.E., Oto, O. and Bulbul, A.M. (2016) Sealing of Femoral Tunnel with Autologous Bone Graft Decreases Blood Loss. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Čechoslovaca, 83, 348-350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Toms, A.D., Barker, R.L., Jones, R.S. and Kuiper, J.H. (2004) Impaction Bone-Grafting in Revision Joint Replacement Surgery. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 86, 2050-2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Lonner, J.H., Lotke, P.A., Kim, J. and Nelson, C. (2002) Impaction Grafting and Wire Mesh for Uncontained Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 404, 145-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Lotke, P.A., Carolan, G.F. and Puri, N. (2006) Technique for Impaction Bone Grafting of Large Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 21, 57-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Rudert, M., Holzapfel, B.M., Von Rottkay, E., Holzapfel, D.E. and Noeth, U. (2015) Impaction Bone Grafting for the Reconstruction of Large Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 27, 35-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Calvo, R., Figueroa, D., Díaz-Ledezma, C., Vaisman, A. and Figueroa, F. (2011) Bone Allografts and the Functions of Bone Banks. Revista Médica de Chile, 139, 660-666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Franke, K.F., Nusem, I., Gamboa, G. and Morgan, D.A. (2013) Outcome of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Bone Allograft in 30 Cases. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 79, 427-434.
[28] Backstein, D., Safir, O. and Gross, A. (2006) Management of Bone Loss: Structural Grafts in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 446, 104-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Bauman, R.D., Lewallen, D.G. and Hanssen, A.D. (2009) Limitations of Structural Allograft in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 467, 818-824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Beckmann, N.A., Mueller, S., Gondan, M., Jaeger, S., Reiner, T. and Bitsch, R.G. (2015) Treatment of Severe Bone Defects during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones—A Systematic Review. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 30, 249-253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Dennis, D.A. and Little, L.R. (2005) The Structural Allograft Composite in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 28, 1005-1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Completo, A., Simões, J.A. and Fonseca, F. (2009) Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Influence of Femoral Stems in Load Sharing and Stability. Knee, 16, 275-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Lyall, H.S., Sanghrajka, A. and Scott, G. (2009) Severe Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Replacement Managed with Structural Femoral Head Allograft: A Prospective Case Series from the Royal London Hospital. Knee, 16, 326-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Huten, D. (2013) Femorotibial Bone Loss during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 99, S22-S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Brand, M.G., Daley, R.J., Ewald, F.C. and Scott, R.D. (1989) Tibial Tray Augmentation with Modular Metal Wedges for Tibial Bone Stock Deficiency. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 248, 71-79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Radnay, C.S. and Scuderi, G.R. (2006) Management of Bone Loss: Augments, Cones, Offset Stems. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 446, 83-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Patel, J.V., Masonis, J.L., Guerin, J., Bourne, R.B. and Rorabeck, C.H. (2004) The Fate of Augments to Treat Type-2 Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 86, 195-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] Lei, P.F., Hu, R.Y. and Hu, Y.H. (2019) Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty and Management. Orthopaedic Surgery, 11, 15-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Rajgopal, A., Kumar, S. and Aggarwal, K. (2021) Midterm Outcomes of Tantalum Metal Cones for Severe Bone Loss in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today, 7, 76-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Howard, J.L., Kudera, J., Lewallen, D.G. and Hanssen, A.D. (2011) Early Results of the Use of Tantalum Femoral Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and joint Surgery. American Volume, 93, 478-484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Lachiewicz, P.F., Bolognesi, M.P., Henderson, R.A., Soileau, E.S. and Vail, T.P. (2012) Can Tantalum Cones Provide Fixation in Complex Revision Knee Arthroplasty? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 470, 199-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Gebauer, M., Gehrke, T. and Jakobs, O. (2015) The Use of Tantalum Cones for Reconstruction of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 27, 17-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Schildhauer, T.A., Robie, B., Muhr, G. and Köller, M. (2006) Bacterial Adherence to Tantalum versus Commonly Used Orthopedic Metallic Implant Materials. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 20, 476-484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Sentürk, U. and Perka, C. (2018) Knie-TEP-Verankerung bei Revision und schlechten Knochenverhältnissen. Knochen, Zement, Schaft, Sleeve, Konus? Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, 156, 711-717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Martin, J.R., Watters, T.S., Levy, D.L., Jennings, J.M. and Dennis, D.A. (2016) Removing a Well-Fxed Femoral Sleeve during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today, 2, 171-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Jiang, C. and Qian, W. (2015) Results of Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Editorial Comment on Recently Published in the Journal of Arthroplasty. Annals of Translational Medicine, 3, 317.
[47] Marongiu, G., Capone, A., Verona, M., Piovan, G., Zorzi, C., Kendoff, D. and Bandino, M. (2023) The Management of Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: The Role of Porous Metal Cones and 3D-Printed Cones. Prosthesis, 5, Article No. 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[48] Alexander, G.E., Bernasek, T.L., Crank, R.L. and Haidukewych, G.J. (2013) Cementless Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Large Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 28, 604-607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Meneghini, R.M., Lewallen, D.G. and Hanssen, A.D. (2008) Use of Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Tibial Bone Loss during Revision Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 90, 78-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[50] Long, W.J. and Scuderi, G.R. (2009) Porous Tantalum Cones for Large Metaphyseal Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 24, 1086-1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Kamath, A.F., Lewallen, D.G. and Hanssen, A.D. (2015) Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Five to Nine-Year Follow-Up. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 97, 216-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[52] Barnett, S.L., Mayer, R.R., Gondusky, J.S., Choi, L., Patel, J.J. and Gorab, R.S. (2014) Use of Stepped Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Sleeves for Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short Term Results. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 29, 1219-1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]