早期听觉刺激对早产儿经口喂养的效果研究
A Study on the Effect of Early Auditory Stimulation on Oral Feeding of Premature Infants
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1441022, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘 丹, 梁荣华*, 陈敏琪, 詹凌燕, 钟金元:广州医科大学附属第三医院儿科,广东 广州
关键词: 早产儿早期听觉刺激经口喂养Premature Infants Early Auditory Stimulation Oral Feeding
摘要: 目的:分析三种早期听觉刺激对早产儿经口喂养的效果,为早产儿早期听觉刺激在临床上的推广利用提供理论依据。方法:将符合纳入标准的157例早产儿按随机化数字表分组法分为对照组和3组干预组,对照组(n = 40),采用口腔运动干预方案;干预组在对照组的基础上分别采用轻音乐(n = 40)、白噪声(n = 38)、母亲声音(n = 39)三种早期听觉刺激干预。观察比较四组早产儿喂养进程、喂养表现、喂养耐受情况。结果:干预组从开始经口喂养到完全经口喂养的过渡时间均短于对照组(P < 0.05),其中,白噪声组及母亲声音组过渡时间短于轻音乐组(P < 0.05);干预组喂养不耐受发生率均低于对照组(P < 0.05),但三组干预组之间比较无统计学意义(P > 0.05);在经口喂养成效方面,干预组与对照组比较无统计学意义(P > 0.05),而在喂养效率方面,干预组在完全经口喂养时各组的喂养效率均高于对照组(P < 0.05),母亲声音组喂养效率高于白噪声组和轻音乐组(P < 0.05)。结论:轻音乐、白噪声、母亲声音能缩短早产儿从开始经口喂养到完全经口喂养的过渡时间,且白噪声及母亲声音效果优于轻音乐;轻音乐、白噪声、母亲声音都能降低早产儿喂养不耐受发生率,但三者之间比较无差异;轻音乐、白噪声、母亲声音不能提升患儿的喂养成效,但可以提升喂养效率,且母亲声音刺激提升喂养效率的效果最显著。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the effects of three kinds of early auditory stimulation on oral feeding of premature infants, and to provide theoretical basis for clinical application of early auditory stimulation in premature infants. Methods: Totally 157 premature infants were recruited and randomly divided into control group and three intervention groups. The infants in the control group received oral movement intervention (n = 40), while the infants in the intervention group received three kinds of early auditory stimulation including light music (n = 40), white noise (n = 38) and maternal sound (n = 39) in addition to the oral movement intervention. We observed and compared the feeding process, feeding performance and feeding tolerance of premature infants. Results: The transition time from beginning to complete oral feeding of intervention groups was shorter than that of control group (P < 0.05); The transition time of white noise and maternal sound was shorter than that of light music group (P < 0.05). The incidence of feeding intolerance of intervention group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05), however there was no significant difference among the three intervention groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of oral feeding between the intervention groups and the control group (P < 0.05). However, the feeding efficiency of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05), the feeding efficiency of maternal sound group was higher than that of white noise group and light music group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Light music, white noise and maternal sound can shorten the transition time from the beginning of oral feeding to complete oral feeding, and the effect of white noise and maternal sound is better than that of light music. Light music, white noise and maternal sound can reduce the incidence of feeding intolerance of premature infants, but there is no difference among the three. Light music, white noise and maternal sound could not improve the feeding efficiency of premature infants, but could improve the feeding efficiency, and maternal sound stimulation had the most significant effect on improving feeding efficiency.
文章引用:刘丹, 梁荣华, 陈敏琪, 詹凌燕, 钟金元. 早期听觉刺激对早产儿经口喂养的效果研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(4): 305-312. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1441022

参考文献

[1] Sourabh, D., Balpreet, S., Lorraine, C., et al. (2015) Guidelines for Feeding Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Nutrients, 7, 423-442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 李淼, 马晓琪, 林素花, 等. 口腔运动干预多早产儿经口喂养能力的影响[J]. 汕头大学医学院学报, 2023, 36(4): 211-214.
[3] 孙兴, 李克华, 全惠云, 等. 早产儿经口喂养促进的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(18): 3301-3306.
[4] Akca, K. and Aytekin, A. (2014) Effect of Soothing Noise on Sucking Success of Newborns. Breastfeeding Medicine, 9, 538-542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Fucile, S., Gisel, E.Q. and Lau, C. (2005) Effect of an Oral Stimulation Program on Sucking Skill Maturation of Preterm Infants. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 158-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 吕天婵. 口腔运动干预改善早产儿经口喂养的效果评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2013.
[7] 周春兰, 仝慧茹, 徐慧颖, 等. 中文版早产儿准备经口喂养评估量表的信度效度评价[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2013, 28(7): 501-505.
[8] 中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会循证专业委员会. 早产儿喂养不耐受临床诊疗指南(2020) [J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2020, 22(10): 1047-1055.
[9] 马兰, 蒋盘华, 陶亚琴, 等. 影响早产儿经口喂养表现的因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016, 24(1): 89-92.
[10] 颜惠萍, 施燕禧, 张美莉, 等. 不同口腔干预运动在早产儿经口喂养中的临床研究[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2020, 17(5): 112-115.
[11] Liszka, L., Smith, J., Mathur, A., et al. (2019) Differences in Early Auditory Exposure across Neonatal Environments. Early Human Development, 136, 27-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 季福婷, 刘晴, 袁皓, 等. 不同背景声音对早产儿喂养状况影响的研究[J]. 上海护理, 2021, 21(8): 43-46.
[13] 李阳, 贾玉凤, 高淑芝, 等. 亲子音乐干预对早产儿语言发展的影响[J]. 中国康复, 2023, 38(4): 232-235.
[14] 李凤妮. 母亲声音刺激与口腔运动干预对早产儿经口喂养、心率及行为状态的效果研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2016.
[15] Williamson, S. and McGrath, J.M. (2019) What Are the Effects of the Maternal Voice on Preterm Infants in the NICU? Advances in Neonatal Care, 19, 294-310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Neel, M.L., Yoder, P., Matusz, P.J., et al. (2019) Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol to Improve Multisensory Neural Processing, Language and Motor Outcomes in Preterm Infants. BMC Pediatrics, 19, Article No. 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Karakoc, A. and Turker, F. (2014) Effects of White Noise and Holding on Pain Perception in Newborns. Pain Management Nursing, 15, 864-870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 胡鹏, 张小华, 韩玉珠, 等. 母亲声音刺激联合非营养性吸吮对早产儿经口喂养的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2020, 20(5): 931-934, 939.
[19] 任向芳, 杨梅. 白噪声疗法在新生儿临床护理中的应用现状[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(1): 125-128.
[20] 李凤妮, 李小容, 薛伟世, 等. 母亲声音刺激对早产儿经口喂养的影响[J]. 中国护理管理, 2016, 16(4): 481-485.
[21] Chorna, O.D., Slaughter, J.C., Wang, L., et al. (2014) A Pacifier Activated Music Player with Mother’s Voice Improves Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics, 133, 462-468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 张莹. 音乐联合口腔运动干预疗法对早产儿喂养表现的影响分析[J]. 中西医结合心血管病杂志, 2017, 5(33): 165.
[23] Loewy, J., Stewart, K., Dassler, A.M., et al. (2013) The Effects of Music Therapy on Vital Signs, Feeding, and Sleep in Premature Infants. Pediatrics, 131, 902-918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]