情绪对不同反刍思维类型大学生道德判断能力的影响
The Effect of Emotions on the Moral Judgment of College Students with Different Rumination Thinking Types
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.144194, PDF,   
作者: 庞晴晴:曲阜师范大学心理学院,山东 曲阜
关键词: 道德判断情绪反刍思维Moral Judgment Emotions Rumination
摘要: 目的:探讨反刍思维和情绪与道德判断能力之间的关系。方法:采用随机抽样方法选取300名大学生参与研究,通过反刍思维评定量表对被试进行筛选和分组后进行情绪诱发并使用情绪评定量表和中文版的道德判断测验(MJT)完成施测。结果:(1) 在道德判断行为上,情绪的主效应显著,快乐情绪状态下的道德判断能力显著高于悲伤情绪状态下的道德判断能力;反刍思维主效应不显著;(2) 反刍思维与情绪的交互作用边缘显著,快乐状态下高低反刍思维被试道德判断能力得分存在显著差异且高反刍思维被试得分显著低于低反刍思维被试,悲伤状态下高低反刍被试道德判断能力得分无显著差异。结论:情绪对道德判断能力影响显著,快乐情绪状态下个体的道德判断能力显著高于悲伤情绪状态下的道德判断能力;反刍思维对道德判断能力的影响不显著。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between ruminative thinking and emotions and moral judgment ability. Methods: A random sampling method was used to select 300 college students to participate in the study, and the subjects were screened and grouped by the Rumination Thinking Scale, then elicited with emotions and administered with the Emotion Rating Scale and the Chinese version of the Moral Judgment Test (MJT). Results: (1) In terms of moral judgment behavior, the main effect of emotion was significant, and moral judgment ability in the state of happy emotion was significantly higher than that in the state of sad emotion; the main effect of ruminative thinking was not significant; (2) the interaction between ruminative thinking and emotion was borderline significant, with significant differences in moral judgment scores between high and low ruminative thinking subjects in the happy state and with high ruminative thinking subjects scoring significantly lower than low ruminative thinking subjects, and no significant differences in moral judgment scores between high and low ruminative thinking subjects in the sad state. Conclusion: Emotions have a significant effect on moral judgment ability, and the moral judgment ability of individuals in the happy emotion state is significantly higher than that in the sad emotion state; the effect of rumination on moral judgment ability is not significant.
文章引用:庞晴晴 (2024). 情绪对不同反刍思维类型大学生道德判断能力的影响. 心理学进展, 14(4), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.144194

参考文献

[1] 顾海根, 李伯黍(1997). 上海地区青少年道德判断能力测验的编制及常模制定. 心理科学, (3), 197-201, 286.
[2] 郭素然, 伍新春, 郭幽圻, 王琳琳, 唐顺艳(2011). 大学生反刍思维对消极情感和积极情感的影响——以孤独感和情绪智力为例. 心理发展与教育, 27(3), 329-336.
[3] 韩秀, 杨宏飞(2009). Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(5), 550-551, 549.
[4] 来水木, 韩秀, 杨宏飞(2009). 国外反刍思维研究综述. 应用心理学, 15(1), 90-96.
[5] 马鑫, 赵晴雪, 王觅, 杨寅, 钱铭怡, 戴赟, 王文余, 戴广南, 张妩(2013). 高反刍思维个体对情绪词汇的抑制缺失. 中国心理卫生杂志, 27(12), 918-923.
[6] 王妍, 胡金生, 李松泽(2016). 反刍思维: 抑郁研究的新视角. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(4), 635-640.
[7] 王永春, 任慧娟(2014). 人格特质与道德判断能力的关系及情绪类型的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(3), 411-413.
[8] 王云强, 郭本禹, 吴慧红(2007). 情绪状态对大学生道德判断能力的影响. 心理科学, 30(6), 1324-1327.
[9] 吴宝沛, 张雷(2012). 厌恶与道德判断的关系. 心理科学进展, 20(2), 309-316.
[10] 杨韶刚, 吴慧红(2006). 青少年道德判断能力的研究. 心理学探新, 26(2), 55-60.
[11] 张静(2013). 影响我国青少年道德判断能力的因素分析. 思想教育研究, (12), 93-96.
[12] 赵抒(2017). 快乐和悲伤情绪对大学生道德判断的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 成都: 电子科技大学.
[13] Decety, J., & Porges, E. C. (2011). Imagining Being the Agent of Actions That Carry Different Moral Consequences: An fMRI Study. Neuropsychological, 49, 2994-3001.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Fataneh, Z., Martin, C., & Stephanie, M. (2000). The Effects of Happiness and Sadness on Moral Reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 397-412.[CrossRef
[15] Lyubomirsky, S., & Tkach, C. (2004). The Consequences of Dysphoric Rumination. In C. Papageorgiou, & A. Wells (Eds.), Depressive Rumination: Nature, Theory and Treatment (pp. 33). Willy.[CrossRef
[16] Michl, L. C., Mclaughlin, K. A., Shepherd, K. et al. (2013). Rumination as a Mechanism Linking Stressful Life Events to Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Longitudinal Evidence in Early Adolescents and Adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 339-352.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Van den Bos, K. (2003). On the Subjective Quality of Social Justice: The Role of Affect as Information in the Psychology of Justice Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 482-498.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Watkins, E., & Brown, R. G. (2002). Rumination and Executive Function in Depression: An Experimental Study. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72, 400-402.[CrossRef] [PubMed]