人工智能生成内容的不可版权性

Non-Copyright Ability of AI-Generated Content

摘要: 当前人工智能技术飞速发展，其生成内容的著作权法定性问题饱受争议。著作权法旨在鼓励人类创作更多高质量的作品，而人工智能无法受到创新激励。人工智能仅能作为法律关系客体，拟制主体说逻辑不能成立。应严格区分人工智能生成与人工智能协助完成的内容，否定创作工具说。人工智能缺乏人类的创作意图与认知能力，其运行过程仅能定性为“仿创”。人工智能运用规律寻找最优解的过程中创作空间不足，输出内容不满足最低限度的创造性要求，故人工智能生成内容不构成作品。

Abstract: The current rapid development of AI technology has led to controversy over the characterisation of the content it generates under copyright law. Copyright law aims to encourage human beings to create more high-quality works, while AI cannot be incentivised by innovation. AI can only be used as the object of legal relationship, and the logic of the proposed subject theory cannot be established. A strict distinction should be made between AI-generated and AI-assisted content, and the creative tool theory should be rejected. AI lacks the creative intention and cognitive ability of human beings, and its operation process can only be characterised as “imitation creation”. In the process of searching for the optimal solution by applying the laws of AI, there is insufficient room for creativity, and the output content does not meet the minimum requirements of creativity, so the content generated by AI does not constitute a work.