工程硕士学习成果评价指标体系构建研究
Research on the Construction of Evaluation Index System for Master of Engineering Learning Achievement
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.142230, PDF,   
作者: 高艺佳:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 工程硕士学习成果评价Master of Engineering Learning Outcomes Evaluation
摘要: 工程硕士教育是培养高层次、应用型工程技术人才的重要途径,其培养质量的好坏将直接影响我国的工程人力供给。对工程硕士学习成果的评价侧面反映了对工程硕士教育质量的评价,完善工程硕士学习成果评价指标体系对于优化工程人才培养模式具有重要意义。本文采用德尔菲法和AHP层次分析法筛选出核心指标并确定指标权重,初步建设了由“通用学习成果”“专业学习成果”2个一级指标、6个二级指标和34个三级指标构成的工程硕士学习成果评价指标体系,发现我国现阶段对于工程硕士的要求更加强调“通用能力”,专业能力较为欠缺,为未来工程硕士培养模式变革与评价维度改变提供了借鉴。
Abstract: Master of Engineering education is an important way to cultivate high-level, application-oriented engineering talents, and the quality of its cultivation will directly affect the supply of engineering manpower in China. The evaluation of engineering master’s learning outcomes laterally reflects the evaluation of the quality of engineering master’s education, and it is of great significance to improve the evaluation index system of engineering master’s learning outcomes in order to optimize the engineering manpower training mode. This paper adopts the Delphi method and AHP hierarchical analysis method to screen out the core indicators and determine the weights of the indicators, and initially constructs the evaluation index system of engineering master’s degree learning outcomes composed of two first-level indicators of “general learning outcomes” and “professional learning outcomes”, six second-level indicators and 34 third-level indicators. Learning outcomes evaluation index system, found that China’s current stage of the requirements for the master of engineering more emphasis on “general competence”, the lack of professional competence, for the future of the master of engineering cultivation mode change and evaluation dimensions of the change provides a reference.
文章引用:高艺佳. 工程硕士学习成果评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(2): 1333-1343. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.142230

参考文献

[1] 国务院. 国务院关于印发《中国制造2025》的通知[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm.2015-05-19, 2024-01-08.
[2] 中华人民共和国教育部. 国务院学位委员会、教育部关于印发《专业学位研究生教育发展方案(2020-2025)》[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/202009/t20200930_492590.html, 2024-01-08.
[3] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于深入推进学术学位与专业学位研究生教育分类发展的意见[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/202312/t20231218_1095043.html, 2024-01-08.
[4] Lazar, V., Laura, G. and Dan, P. (2007) Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000134621
[5] Ewell, P.T (2001) Accreditation and Student Learning Outcomes: A Proposed Point of Departure. Council for Higher Education Accreditation, Washington, DC, 5 p.
[6] 吕林海. 国际视野下的本科生学习结果评估——对“评估什么”和“如何评估”的分析与思考[J]. 比较教育研究, 2012, 34(1): 39-44.
[7] 黄海涛. 美国高等教育中的“学生学习成果评估”: 内涵与特征[J]. 高等教育研究, 2010, 31(7): 97-104.
[8] 袁勤俭, 宗乾进, 沈洪洲. 德尔菲法在我国的发展及应用研究[J]. 现代情报, 2011, 31(5): 3-7.
[9] 许树柏. 层次分析法原理[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 1988: 11-12.