高中数学教材数学建模问题情境水平比较研究——以人教A版和苏教版函数部分为例
A Comparative Study on the Level of Mathematical Modelling Problem Contexts in High School Mathematics Textbooks—Taking the Function Part of People’s Education Edition A and Jiangsu Education Edition as an Example
摘要: 本文选取人教A版和苏教版高中数学教材函数部分作为研究对象,从情境类型和特征水平两大维度对两版教材函数部分数学建模问题情境水平进行比较分析。研究发现:在情境类型上,两版教材更倾向于培养学生解决实际问题和应用数学的能力,对个人生活的应用场景关注度不够;在数学特征水平上,两版教材均是无运算的占比最高,人教A版数字特征相对更显著;在表征特征水平上,两版教材均以复合型表征为主,综合型表征设置较少;在任务特征水平上,两版教材均侧重于问题解决,问题探究型情境相对较少。最后,本文针对其中存在的问题提出建议,研究结论为高中数学教材中数学建模问题情境水平的改进提供了理论基础。
Abstract:
The function part of the high school mathematics textbook of the People’s Education Edition A and the Jiangsu Education Edition was selected as the research object, and the level of the mathematical modeling problem contexts in the function part of the two editions was compared and analyzed from the two major dimensions of context type and feature level. The study found that: in terms of context type, the two editions of the textbook are more inclined to cultivate students’ ability to solve practical problems and apply mathematics, and do not pay enough attention to the application scenarios of personal life; at the level of mathematical features, the two editions of the textbook both have the highest proportion of no operations, and the numerical features of the People’s Education Edition A are relatively more significant; at the level of representational features, the two editions of the textbook are dominated by composite representations and the comprehensive representations are set up less often. At the level of task features, both editions of the textbook focus on problem-solving, and there are relatively few problem-inquiry situations. Finally, recommendations are made for the problems that exist. The findings provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of the level of mathematical modeling problem situations in high school mathematics textbooks.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
隗斌贤, 徐雅. 数学建模及其对学生应用能力的培养[J]. 统计教育, 2002(3): 19-20.
|
|
[2]
|
汪飞飞, 张维忠. 中国中学数学建模研究的历程与论题及其启示[J]. 数学教育学报, 2022, 31(2): 63-68.
|
|
[3]
|
赵思林, 崔静静. 中学数学建模的问题及其解决[J]. 教学与管理, 2019(1): 45-47.
|
|
[4]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版) [M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2018.
|
|
[5]
|
黄健, 徐斌艳, 王思凯. 教学转换理论视角下高中数学新编教材中数学建模的知识形态[J]. 全球教育展望, 2022, 51(3): 33-48.
|
|
[6]
|
李保臻, 陈国益. 高中数学教科书中数学建模问题情境的比较研究[J]. 数学教育学报, 2022, 31(3): 6-14.
|
|
[7]
|
经济合作与发展组织(OECD). 面向明日世界的学习: 国际学生评估项目(PISA) 2003报告[M]. 上海市教育科学研究院, 国际学生评估项目上海研究中心, 译. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2008.
|
|
[8]
|
陈志辉. 中美两国初中数学课程的问题情境水平比较研究——以“函数”内容为例[J]. 数学教育学报, 2016, 25(1): 5-9.
|
|
[9]
|
Li, Y.P. (2000) A Comparison of Problems That Follow Selected Content Presentations in American and Chinese Mathematics Textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 234-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
王一粟, 范良火. 从情境视角分析我国最新高中数学教科书的数学应用特征[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2023, 43(5): 109-116.
|