不同注意负荷对风险决策框架效应影响
The Impact of Different Attention Loads on the Risk Decision-Making Framework Effect
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.144263, PDF,   
作者: 聂长迪, 赵 雪:华北理工大学心理与精神卫生学院,河北 唐山;高志华:天津职业技术师范大学职业教育学院,天津
关键词: 风险决策框架效应注意分散Risk Decision Framing Effect Distraction
摘要: 目的:研究风险决策行为在框架(正性框架和负性框架)效应和集中注意与分散注意两种条件影响下的大脑加工机制。方法:采用Eprime收集在不同注意条件下不同决策框架任务中。结果:分析被试决策行为反应时和选择项比率发现:框架效应和注意力条件主效应显著,被试的决策行为在注意分散条件下的反应时显著高于在注意集中条件下的反应时;正性框架下更倾向于风险规避,在负性框架下更倾向于寻求冒险。结论:注意分散影响决策任务反应时间:在不同注意条件下,决策行为反应时差异显著。当在注意集中条件下时,被试进行决策行为更为迅速。决策信息框架会影响个体决策行为:正性框架下行为更倾向于保守;负性框架下行为更倾向于冒险。
Abstract: Objective: To study the brain processing mechanisms of risk decision-making behavior under the effects of frameworks (positive and negative frameworks) and the influence of two conditions: focused attention and dispersed attention. Method: Eprime was used to collect data from different decision-making framework tasks under different attention conditions. Result: Analysis of the reaction time and choice ratio of the decision-making behavior of the subjects revealed that the framing effect and attention condition main effect were significant, and the reaction time of the decision-making behavior of the subjects under attention dispersion conditions was significantly higher than that under attention concentration conditions; under a positive framework, there is a greater tendency towards risk aversion, while under a negative framework, there is a greater tendency to seek adventure. Conclusion: Attention dispersion affects decision task response time: under different attention conditions, there are significant differences in decision behavior response time. When under the condition of concentration of attention, participants make decisions more quickly. The decision-making information framework can affect individual decision-making behavior: under a positive framework, behavior tends to be more conservative; under a negative framework, behavior tends to be more adventurous.
文章引用:聂长迪, 赵雪, 高志华 (2024). 不同注意负荷对风险决策框架效应影响. 心理学进展, 14(4), 654-660. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.144263

参考文献

[1] 何贵兵(1996). 决策任务特征对风险态度的影响. 人类工效学, (2), 12-16 69.
[2] 何桂华, 金志成(2010). 框架效应认知机制的研究. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 38(5), 178-181.
[3] 何海瑛, 张剑, 朱滢(2001). 注意分散对虚假再认的影响. 心理学报, (1), 17-23.
[4] 胡伟国, 胡瑜(2009). 时间压力对风险决策中框架效应的影响. 心理科学, 32(3), 694-696.
[5] 李月秋(2016). 注意偏向的情绪调节功能及其对风险决策的影响. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京大学.
[6] 王波(2014). 个体特征和任务特征对风险决策的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 桂林: 广西师范大学.
[7] 王璐璐, 李永娟(2012). 心理疲劳与任务框架对风险决策的影响. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1546-1550.
[8] 杨文静(2011). 风险决策中框架效应认知与情绪作用机制的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 暨南大学.
[9] 张健(2013). 认知风格对不同类型框架效应的影响研究. 博士学位论文, 大连: 辽宁师范大学.
[10] 张文海, 卢家楣(2012). 注意分散情绪调节的晚期正电位. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(6), 773-776.
[11] 周微(2017). 调节定向和框架类型对风险决策影响的ERP研究. 硕士学位论文, 新乡: 新乡医学院.
[12] Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2006). Temporal Course of Emotional Negativity Bias: An ERP Study. Neuroscience Letters, 398, 91-96.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251-278.[CrossRef