考虑补贴对象的废旧衣物逆向回收决策研究
Study on Reverse Recycling Decision of Waste Clothing Considering Subsidy Object
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2024.133181, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 贾晓霞, 李文卿, 方金丹：上海理工大学管理学院，上海；陆向阳：中国邮政储蓄银行，江苏 苏州
关键词: 废旧衣物；政府补贴；逆向回收；Waste Clothing； Government Subsidy； Reverse Recycle
摘要: 基于对我国现有废旧衣物回收模式的调研，考虑政府是否提供补贴以及不同补贴对象的情境，运用博弈论构建了四种废旧衣物回收决策模型。运用逆向归纳法求解出这四种回收模型的最优均衡解并进行了比较分析，结论如下：相较于不提供补贴，无论是生产商回收，还是零售商回收，政府提供补贴情况下废旧衣物的最优回收率、供应链成员及总利润都将得到提高；相较于补贴零售商，政府采取补贴生产商的回收渠道，将有望在一定条件下实现补贴效益和供应链总利润的最大化。最后，从政府、企业和消费者角度对废旧衣物回收提出了一些针对性建议，以供决策参考。
Abstract: Based on the investigation and survey on our present waste clothing recycling model, considering the subsidy or not and different subsidy objects, four recycling models of waste clothing are constructed and the optimal equilibrium solutions are solved by using the method of reverse inductive method. The following conclusions are drawn as follows. Compared with non-subsidy, government subsidies can improve the optimal recovery rate and the total profit of the supply chain. Also, compared with the retailer, if the government adopts the recycling decision of subsidizing manufacturers, it can maximize the subsidy benefit and the total profit of the supply chain under certain conditions. In the end, the corresponding suggestions are presented from the viewpoint of government, enterprise and consumer.
文章引用：贾晓霞, 陆向阳, 李文卿, 方金丹. 考虑补贴对象的废旧衣物逆向回收决策研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(3): 1939-1959. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.133181

参考文献

[1] 郭燕. 广州市和深圳市旧衣物回收行业现状分析[J]. 再生资源与循环经济, 2017, 10(8): 17-19.
[2] 王明敬. 政府补贴下考虑消费者偏好的旧衣回收再制造绿色供应链研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2020.
[3] 陈遊芳. 美国废旧纺织品回收体系及对中国的启示[J]. 毛纺科技, 2015, 43(2): 62-65.
[4] Ho, K.-C., Hui, P.C.-L., Tao, X.-M. and Yeung, K.-W. (2005) Measuring the Technological Development of Textiles and Clothing Industry in Hong Kong, Italy and the USA: Using a “Technometric” Approach. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 4, 153-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Norris, L. (2012) Trade and Transformations of Secondhand Clothing: Introduction. Textile, 10, 128-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Muthu, S.S., Li, Y., Hu, J.Y. and Mok, P.Y. (2012) Recyclability Potential Index (RPI): The Concept and Quantification of RPI for Textile Fibres. Ecological Indicators, 18, 58-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Laitala, K. and Klepp, I.G. (2015) Clothing Disposal Habits and Consequences for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 345-365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Hawley, J.M. (2006) Textile Recycling: A Systems Perspective. In: Wang, Y.J., Ed., Recycling in Textiles, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 7-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Woolridge, A.C., Ward, G.D., Phillips, P.S., Collins, M. and Gandy, S. (2006) Life Cycle Assessment for Reuse/Recycling of Donated Waste Textiles Compared to Use of Virgin Material: An UK Energy Saving Perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 46, 94-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Worrell, E. (2013) Recycling in Waste Management Policy. Handbook of Recycling, State-of-the-Art for Practitioners, Analysts, and Scientists, 497-501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Bukhari, M.A., Carrasco-Gallego, R. and Ponce-Cueto, E. (2018) Developing a National Programme for Textiles and Clothing Recovery. Waste Management & Research, 36, 321-331.
[12] Karaer, O. and Lee, H.L. (2007) Managing the Reverse Channel with RFID-Enabled Negative Demand Information. Production & Operations Management, 16, 625-645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Atasu, A., Toktay, L.B. and Van Wassenhove, L.N. (2013) How Collection Cost Structure Drives a Manufacturer’s Reverse Channel Choice. Production and Operations Management, 22, 1089-1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Chen, C. and Ulya, M.A. (2019) Analyses of the Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Green Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Product Remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 211-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Wang, J.B., Zhang, T. and Fan, X.J. (2020) Reverse Channel Design with a Dominant Retailer and Upstream Competition in Emerging Markets: Retailer-or Manufacturer-Collection? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 137, Article ID: 101924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Huang, M., Song, M., Lee, L.H., and Ching, W.K. (2013) Analysis for Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Dual Recycling Channel. International Journal of Production Economics, 144, 510-520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 徐剑平. 循环经济下旧衣服回收产业电子服务模式研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2015.
[18] 宗刚, 魏素豪. 基于回收意识的废旧衣物回收模式对比分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(10): 2583-2589.
[19] 王发鸿, 达庆利. 电子行业再制造逆向物流模式选择决策分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, 14(6): 44-49.
[20] 汪翼, 孙林岩, 杨洪焦, 等. 不同回收法律下的再制造供应链决策与合作研究[J]. 管理科学, 2009, 22(1): 2-8.
[21] 周永圣, 汪寿阳. 政府监控下的退役产品回收模式[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(4): 615-621.
[22] 马祖军, 胡书, 代颖. 政府规制下电器电子产品闭环供应链决策[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2016, 21(1): 45-51.
[23] 朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6): 86-95.
[24] 余福茂, 钟永光, 沈祖志. 考虑政府引导激励的电子废弃物回收处理决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5): 131-137.
[25] 高明, 廖梦灵. 政府补贴下的电子废弃物回收处理模型分析[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(8): 91-96.
[26] 赵敬华, 林杰. 不同补贴对象下的闭环供应链定价模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2017, 31(1): 85-92.
[27] 熊中楷, 黄德斌, 熊榆. 政府奖励条件下基于再制造的闭环供应链模式[J]. 工业工程, 2011, 14(2): 1-5.
[28] 林贵华, 单仁邦, 陈拼博. 政府补贴下闭环供应链回收渠道的选择策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 43-53.

为你推荐