电商平台强制二选一行为的反垄断分析研究
Antitrust Analysis Research on the Forced “Either-Or” Choice by E-Commerce Platforms
摘要: “二选一”行为本质是排他性交易,电商平台利用“二选一”滥用市场支配地位,目标是市场独占。电子商务法、反垄断法、反不正当竞争法是规制电商“二选一”的法律依据,但现有法律条文难以对“二选一”行为进行有效制裁。“二选一”行为会造成市场垄断,反垄断法是规制的核心。分析“二选一”行为时要注意电商平台的行业特点,从电商平台的市场结构入手,明确电商平台的相关市场,评估“二选一”行为的实际影响,有助于得出合理恰当的结论。
Abstract: The “either-or” choice essentially constitutes an exclusive transaction. E-commerce platforms use the “either-or” tactic to abuse their dominant market position, aiming for market monopoly. The E-commerce Law, Anti-Monopoly Law, and Anti-Unfair Competition Law serve as the legal basis for regulating the “either-or” practices of e-commerce. However, the existing legal provisions are insufficient to effectively sanction the “either-or” behavior. Such practices can lead to market monopolization, with the Anti-Monopoly Law being the core of regulation. When analyzing the “either-or” behavior, it is important to consider the industry characteristics of the e-commerce platforms. Starting with the market structure of the e-commerce platforms, clarifying their relevant markets, and assessing the actual impact of the “either-or” behavior will contribute to reaching a reasonable and appropriate conclusion.
文章引用:潘豪. 电商平台强制二选一行为的反垄断分析研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(2): 981-985. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.132117

参考文献

[1] 丁晓东. 论数据携带权的属性、影响与中国应用[J]. 法商研究, 2020(1): 73-86.
[2] 兰燕卓. 电商平台“二选一”行为的规制路径探索[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2021(6): 129-137.
[3] 刘维. 论网络不正当竞争一般条款的价值取向[J]. 交大法学, 2021(3): 25-38.
[4] 王先林. 竞争法学[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018: 187.
[5] 王胜伟. 互联网行业限制交易行为的认定及管制——以3Q案腾讯“二选一”为例[J]. 山东社会科学, 2017(12): 174-179.
[6] 蒋舸. 《反不正当竞争法》网络条款的反思与解释——以类型化原理为中心[J]. 中外法学, 2019(1): 180-202.