股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(FNS)的临床疗效观察及有限元分析
Clinical Observation and Finite Element Analysis of Dynamic Cross-Pinning System of Femoral Neck (FNS)
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1451468, PDF,   
作者: 陈松岩:青岛大学医学部,山东 青岛;范 筱, 张其亮*:青岛市市立医院骨关节外科,山东 青岛;董维华:平度市第四人民医院骨科,山东 青岛;窦馥国:大连医科大学研究生院,辽宁 大连
关键词: 股骨颈骨折股骨颈动力交叉钉系统有限元分析内固定Femoral Neck Fracture Femoral Neck Dynamic Cross-Pinning System Finite Element Analysis Internal Fixation
摘要: 目的:探讨股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(FNS)的有限元分析及其治疗股骨颈骨折(FNF)的临床疗效。方法:选择自2021.12~2022.12在青岛市市立医院接受内固定治疗的年轻股骨颈骨折患者60例,以手术方式进行分组,空心加压螺钉(CCS)组30例接受CCS固定治疗,FNS组30例接受FNS固定治疗。观察两组患者围手术期相关指标,术后采用X线摄片、髋关节CT评估骨折愈合及股骨头是否出现缺血坏死,采用髋关节功能Harris评分对术后临床功能疗效进行评估。利用Solid Works建立股骨颈模型,Ansys workbench软件模拟并分析FNS固定股骨颈骨折的受力情况及特点,通过上述有限元分析技术探究FNS在治疗股骨颈骨折时的力学机制。结果:1) 两组患者性别、年龄、BMI水平、受伤致手术时间等基本资料比较,无统计学意义(P > 0.05);而FNS组患者术前术后血红蛋白差值、手术时间、透视次数、失血量、切口长度等指标均低于CCS组,有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2) FNS组患者的骨折愈合时间及术后6个月复诊时Harris评分均优于CCS组,有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。3) FNS组患者术后并发症发生率6.67%、低于CCS组患者并发症22.22%,有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。4) FNS组件在杨氏模量、泊松比、体积模量、剪切模量、拉伸屈服强度、拉伸极限强度等力学指标的分析研究中,各项性能均优于股骨。结论:1) 对于年轻股骨颈骨折患者使用CCS与FNS内固定手术治疗,结果分析表明FNS内固定治疗更符合微创理念,手术创伤更小,减少透视次数,操作简单,有助于术后快速康复。2) FNS内固定手术可以降低患者术后并发症的发生。3) FNS固定治疗对恢复患者髋关节功能作用更为显著,可早期功能锻炼,可更好提高患者生活质量。4) FNS内固定材料可以满足人体功能需求,可以作为一种可靠的内固定方式供临床选择。
Abstract: Objectiye: To investigate the finite element analysis of femoral neck dynamic cross pinning system (FNS) and its clinical effect in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Methods: A total of 60 young patients with femoral neck fracture who received internal fixation treatment in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from December, 2021 to December, 2022 were selected and divided into surgical groups. 30 patients in the hollow compression screw (CCS) group received CCS fixation treatment, and 30 patients in the FNS group received FNS fixation treatment. Perioperative relevant indexes of the two groups were observed. Postoperative radiography and hip CT were used to evaluate fracture healing and ischemic necrosis of the femoral head. Postoperative clinical efficacy was evaluated by Harris score of hip function. SolidWorks was used to establish the femoral neck model, Ansys workbench software simulated and analyzed the stress situation and characteristics of FNS fixed femoral neck fracture, and explored the mechanical mechanism of FNS in the treatment of femoral neck fracture through the above finite element analysis technology. Result: 1) There was no statistical significance in gender, age, BMI level and operation time between the two groups (P > 0.05); The difference of hemoglobin before and after operation, operation time, fluoroscopy times, blood loss and incision length in FNS group were all lower than those in CCS group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). 2) The fracture healing time and Harris score of patients in FNS group were better than those in CCS group at 6 months after surgery, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). 3) The incidence of postoperative complications in FNS group was 6.67%, lower than that in CCS group by 22.22%, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). 4) In the analysis and study of mechanical indexes such as Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, volume modulus, shear modulus, tensile yield strength and tensile ultimate strength, FNS components are superior to femur. Conclusion: 1) For young patients with femoral neck fractures, CCS and FNS internal fixation surgery were used, and the analysis of the results showed that FNS internal fixation treatment was more in line with the concept of minimally invasive surgery, less surgical trauma, less fluoroscopy times, simple operation, and conducive to rapid postoperative recovery. 2) FNS internal fixation can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. 3) FNS fixation therapy has a more significant effect on restoring the hip function of patients, and can provide early functional exercise and better improve the quality of life of patients. 4) FNS internal fixation materials can meet the functional needs of the human body and can be used as a reliable internal fixation method for clinical selection.
文章引用:陈松岩, 范筱, 董维华, 窦馥国, 张其亮. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(FNS)的临床疗效观察及有限元分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(5): 601-613. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1451468

参考文献

[1] 张健, 汤欣. 青壮年Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的内固定治疗进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(6): 502-506.
[2] 舒杉, 庄乐彬, 王钢, 等. 成年人股骨颈骨折分型的研究进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2022, 24(3): 272-276.
[3] 黄海, 欧阳钧. 内固定治疗成人股骨颈骨折的研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(6): 751-753, 756.
[4] Florschutz, A.V., Langford, J.R., Haidukewych, G.J. and Koval, K.J. (2015) Femoral Neck Fractures: Current Management. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 29, 121-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Sprague, S., Slobogean, G.P., Scott, T., Chahal, M. and Bhandari, M. (2015) Young Femoral Neck Fractures: Are We Measuring Outcomes That Matter? Injury, 46, 507-514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 徐凯航, 纪方. 青壮年股骨颈骨折的治疗进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(6): 549-552.
[7] Samsami, S., Augat, P. and Rouhi, G. (2019) Stability of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation: A Finite Element Analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 233, 892-900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wu, Z.F., Luo, Z.H., Hu, L.C. and Luo, Y.W. (2022) Efficacy of the Femoral Neck System in Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, World Journal of Clinical Cases, 10, 11454-11465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 常廷杰, 葛宇峰, 高峰, 等. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心螺钉固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的近期疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2022, 24(6): 533-537.
[10] Welch-Phillips, A., Gibbons, D., Ahern, D.P. and Butler, J.S. (2020) What Is Finite Element Analysis? Clinical Spine Surgery, 33, 323-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Scott, C.E.H., Simpson, A. and Pankaj, P. (2020) Distinguishing Fact from Fiction in Finite Element Analysis. The Bone & Joint Journal, 102, 1271-1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Taylor, M. and Prendergast, P.J. (2015) Four Decades of Finite Element Analysis of Orthopaedic Devices: Where Are We Now and What Are the Opportunities? Journal of Biomechanics, 48, 767-778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 王家宁, 符绩智, 冯文天, 等. 基于临床CT数字体相关和有限元分析的股骨内部变形场研究[J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2024, 43(1): 9-14, 42.
[14] Umesh, K. and Vidhyapriya, R. (2021) Finite Element Analysis of Lower Limb Exoskeleton during Sit-to-Stand Transition. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 24, 1419-1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Prosso, I. and Lakstein, D. (2021) The Clinically Stable Femoral Neck Fracture. Injury, 52, 3028-3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Ye, Y., Hao, J., Mauffrey, C., Hammerberg, E.M., Stahel, P.F. and Hak, D.J. (2015) Optimizing Stability in Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation. Orthopedics, 38, 625-630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组, 中国医师协会骨科医师分会创伤专家工作委员会. 成人股骨颈骨折诊治指南[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(11): 921-928.
[18] Duffin, M. and Pilson, H.T. (2019) Technologies for Young Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 33, S20-S26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Slobogean, G.P., Sprague, S.A., Scott, T. and Bhandari, M. (2015) Complications Following Young Femoral Neck Fractures. Injury, 46, 484-491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Pei, F., Zhao, R., Li, F., Chen, X., Guo, K. and Zhu, L. (2020) Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head in Young Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Study of 250 Patients Followed for Average of 7.5 Years. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15, Article No. 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Yu, X., Rong, P.Z., Pang, Q.J., Chen, X.J., Shi, L. and Wang, C.H. (2021) The Effect on the Fracture Healing following Femoral Neck Shortening after Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fracture Treated with Internal Fixation: Finite Element Analysis. BioMed Research International, 2021, Article ID: 3490881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 刘英科, 陈勤, 陈柯, 马文龙, 田可为, 范克杰, 毛雯正, 田燃, 邝孝坤. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗中青年垂直不稳定型股骨颈骨折32例[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 70-75, 79.
[23] 梅伟, 洪博文, 丁亮. 两种内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2024(27): 75-78.
[24] 齐远博, 王道峰, 刘道宏, 陶笙. 有限元分析在评价股骨颈骨折内固定方式中的研究进展与展望[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2023, 12(9): 704-710.