环境认知对城市居民生态文明意识的影响：一个有调节的中介效应模型
The Impact of Environmental Cognition on Urban Residents’ Awareness of Ecological Civilization: A Moderated Mediating Effect Model
摘要: 为探讨环境认知、城市居民生态文明意识、环境自我认同及关系流动性之间的关系，选取260名呼和浩特市城市居民为被试，采用环境认知量表、环境自我认同量表、关系移动量表及生态文明意识问卷进行测试。结果表明：(1) 环境认知对城市居民生态文明意识有显著的正向影响，并间接地通过环境自我认同对城市居民生态文明意识产生作用；(2) 关系流动性在环境自我认同对城市居民生态文明意识的影响中起显著的调节作用，即低关系流动水平下，环境自我认同能显著地正向预测城市居民生态文明意识，高关系流动水平下，环境自我认同对城市居民生态文明意识的预测作用更加显著，表现出更强的上升趋势。
Abstract: In order to explore the relationship among environmental cognition, urban residents’ awareness of ecological civilization, environmental self-identification and relationship mobility, 260 urban residents in Hohhot were selected as subjects and tested with environmental cognition scale, environmental self-identification scale, relationship mobility scale and ecological civilization aware- ness questionnaire. The results show that: (1) Environmental cognition has a significant positive impact on urban residents’ awareness of ecological civilization, and indirectly exerts an effect on urban residents’ awareness of ecological civilization through environmental self-identification; (2) Relationship mobility plays a significant moderating role in the impact of environmental self- identification on urban residents’ awareness of ecological civilization, that is, at low relationship flow level, environmental self-identification can significantly positively predict urban residents’ awareness of ecological civilization, while at high relationship flow level, environmental self-iden- tification has a more significant predictive role on urban residents’ awareness of ecological civilization showing a stronger upward trend.
文章引用：曹悦 (2024). 环境认知对城市居民生态文明意识的影响：一个有调节的中介效应模型. 心理学进展, 14(5), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.145289

参考文献

[1] 陈满琪(2018). 关系流动性、城市认同与居住流动意愿的关系. 社会发展研究, 5(3), 103-120 244.
[2] 陈满琪(2022). 关系流动性在居住流动意愿中的作用. 东南学术, (1), 149-160.
[3] 陈伟嘉, 吴寒斌(2022). 关系流动性对老年人生活质量的影响: 社会支持和生命意义感的链式中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 30(2), 186-190.
[4] 崔岩(2012). 流动人口心理层面的社会融入和身份认同问题研究. 社会学研究, 27(5), 141-160 244.
[5] 董维维(2021). 大学生生态文明责任意识培育研究. 思想教育研究, (11), 154-158.
[6] 顿珠罗布, 李晓玲, 张琳, 宋连久(2021). 环境认知、群体认同对生活垃圾分类行为影响研究——基于西藏602户农户的调查问卷. 高原农业, 5(6), 621-628.
[7] 郭利京, 林云志, 周正圆(2020). 村规民约何以规范农户亲环境行为? 干旱区资源与环境, 34(7), 68-74.
[8] 洪大用, 范叶超(2016). 公众环境知识测量: 一个本土量表的提出与检验. 中国人民大学学报, 30(4), 110-121.
[9] 胡伦, 曹琪瑶(2023). 社会认同、环境认知与农户绿色生产行为. 科技和产业, 23(16), 200-206.
[10] 环境保护部(2015). 全国公众生态文明意识调查研究报告.
[11] 黄蕊, 李桦, 杨扬, 于艳丽(2018). 环境认知、榜样效应对半干旱区居民亲环境行为影响研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 32(12), 1-6.
[12] 聂伟(2016). 环境认知、环境责任感与城乡居民的低碳减排行为. 科技管理研究, 36(15), 252-256.
[13] 师硕, 郑逸芳, 黄森慰(2017). 城市居民环境友好行为的影响因素. 城市问题, (5), 81-88.
[14] 石玥, 方章东(2013). 高校生态文明意识教育路径研究. 西昌学院学报(社会科学版), 25(3), 135-138.
[15] 帅庆, 平欲晓(2014). 基于性别差异的生态文明意识培育. 江西社会科学, 34(7), 206-211.
[16] 汤丹丹, 温忠麟(2020). 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 43(1), 215-223.
[17] 王建华, 钭露露(2021). 多维度环境认知对消费者环境友好行为的影响. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 20(3), 78-94 110.
[18] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
[19] 文植, 张笑笑, 赵显(2019). 关系流动性、拒绝敏感性与主观幸福感的关系. 心理学探新, 39(2), 179-185.
[20] 徐洪, 涂红伟(2023). 道德认同还是道德推脱?——旁观者视角下国家公园游客环境态度与亲环境行为关系研究. 旅游学刊, 38(9), 156-168.
[21] 杨冠宇, 李淑敏(2021). 环境自我认同对大学生低碳行为的影响. 心理与行为研究, 19(3), 410-416.
[22] 张斐男(2018). 中国城乡居民环境关心的地区差异研究——基于2010年中国综合社会调查数据的分析和发现. 学习与探索, (7), 39-46.
[23] 张萍, 晋英杰(2015). 我国城乡居民的环境友好行为及其综合影响机制分析——基于2013年中国综合社会调查数据. 社会建设, 2(4), 16-25.
[24] 周志家(2008). 环境意识研究: 现状、困境与出路. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (4), 19-26.
[25] Arman, S. M., & Mark-Herbert, C. (2022). Ethical Pro-Environmental Self-Identity Practice: The Case of Second-Hand Products. Sustainability, 14, 21-54.[CrossRef] 
[26] BoKyung, P., Minjae, K., & Liane, Y. (2022). The Role of Relational Mobility in Relationship Quality and Well-Being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39, 3728-3752.[CrossRef] 
[27] Danilo, G., Ali, A. N., & E, K. O. N. (2014). The Affective Profiles, Psychological Well-Being, and Harmony: Environmental Mastery and Self-Acceptance Predict the Sense of a Harmonious Life. PeerJ, 2, e259.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Falk, C. F., Heine, S. J., Yuki, M., & Takemura, K. (2010). Why Do Westerners Self-Enhance More than East Asians? European Journal of Personality, 23, 183-203.[CrossRef] 
[29] Garaika, G., & Sugandini, D. (2021). Knowledge, Self-Image, and Attitude on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Empirical Study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8, 869-877.
[30] Gil-Giménez, D., Rolo-González, G., Suárez, E., & Muinos, G. (2021). The Influence of Environmental Self-Identity on the Relationship between Consumer Identities and Frugal Behavior. Sustainability, 13, Article No. 9664.[CrossRef] 
[31] Grbosz-Krawczyk, M., Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A., & Flaszewska, S. (2021). From Words to Deeds: The Impact of Pro-En-vironmental Self-Identity on Green Energy Purchase Intention. Energies, 14, Article No. 5732.[CrossRef] 
[32] Hui, Z., & Khan, A. N. (2022). Beyond Pro-Environmental Consumerism: Role of Social Exclusion and Green Self-Identity in Green Product Consumption Intentions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 76339-76351.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Kosuke, T., & Satoko, S. (2017). Self-Expression and Relationship Formation in High Relational Mobility Environments: A Study of Dual Users of American and Japanese Social Networking Sites. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 52, 251-255.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Liu, P., Teng, M., & Han, C. (2020). How Does Environmental Knowledge Translate into Pro-Environmental Behaviors? The Mediating Role of Environmental Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 126-138.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Manjit, K., Rajinder, K., & Anmol, S. (2022). Antecedents of Green Purchase Behavior: A Study of Consumers in Northern India. Electrochemical Society Transactions, 107, 17-28.[CrossRef] 
[36] Schug, J., Yuki, M., Horikawa, H., & Takemura, K. (2010). Similarity Attraction and Actually Selecting Similar Others: How Cross-Societal Differences in Relational Mobility Affect Interpersonal Similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 95-103.[CrossRef] 
[37] Thomson, R., Yuki, M., & Ito, N. (2015). A Socio-Ecological Approach to National Differences in Online Privacy Concern: The Role of Relational Mobility and Trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 285-292.[CrossRef] 
[38] van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2016). The Psychology of Participation and Interest in Smart Energy Systems: Comparing the Value-Belief-Norm Theory and the Value-Identity-Personal Norm Model. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 107-114.[CrossRef] 
[39] Van Der Werff, E., Ellen, Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014). I Am What I Am, by Looking past the Present: The Influence of Biospheric Values and Past Behavior on Environmental Self-Identity. Environment & Behavior, 46, 626-657.[CrossRef] 
[40] Van Der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013a). The Value of Environmental Self-Identity: The Relationship between Biospheric Values, Environmental Self-Identity and Environmental Preferences, Intentions and Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55-63.[CrossRef] 
[41] van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013b). It Is a Moral Issue: The Relationship between Environmental Self-Identity, Obligation-Based Intrinsic Motivation and Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1258-1265.[CrossRef] 
[42] Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioural Responses to Climate Change: Asymmetry of Intentions and Impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 13-23.[CrossRef] 
[43] Yuki, M., Schug, J., Horikawa, H., Takemura, K., Sato, K., Yokota, K., ＆ Kamaya, K. (2007). Development of a Scale to Measure Perceptions of Relational Mobility in Society. Hokkaido University.
[44] Zheng, L., Tong, Z., & Sun, Y. (2021). The Effects of Labeling on Environmental Self-Identity. E3S Web of Conferences, 261, 30-38.[CrossRef]