货物采购竞标交易模式研究
Study on the Competitive Bidding Transaction Model for the Procurement of Goods
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.132178, PDF,   
作者: 梁焯然*, 马艺文:贵州大学管理学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 货物采购运输竞标交易VCG机制Goods Purchase Transport Bidding Transaction VCG Mechanism
摘要: 货物采购涉及供货人、承运商和采购人等交易主体,货物到岸价涉及货物原产地售价与物流费用两项,货源及运输路径的决策是降低综合采购成本的关键,是一个包含多源异质数据为一体的复杂网络决策问题,传统采购是由各交易主体通过询价、比价分别做出采购决策的模式,面临信息不对称和高昂的信息搜寻等交易成本,使得构建高效的货物采购综合决策机制成为挑战。本文以多源异构数据融合为支撑,针对运输网络下货物采购交易结构,通过设计多方竞价交易机制、分配规则,使说真话成为各方交易人的弱占优策略以此降低交易者的信息搜集成本、人工成本和差旅成本等交易成本,本文提出的交易机制能够及时反映市场各类交易信息,快速达成交易匹配从而实现市场资源的合理配置。
Abstract: The procurement of goods involves suppliers, carriers and purchasers, etc. CIF involves the selling price of goods at the place of origin and logistics cost. The decision of the source of goods and transportation path is the key to reducing the comprehensive procurement cost, and it is a complex network decision problem that includes multi-source heterogeneous data. Traditional procurement is a mode in which each transaction subject makes purchasing decisions respectively through inquiry and price comparison. Faced with transaction costs such as information asymmetry and high information search, it becomes a challenge to build an efficient comprehensive decision-making mechanism for goods procurement. In this paper, supported by multi-source heterogeneous data fusion, aiming at the transaction structure of goods procurement under the transport network, the multi-party bidding trading mechanism and distribution rules are designed to make truth-telling become the dominant strategy of traders of all parties to reduce the transaction costs of traders such as information collection costs, labor costs, and travel costs. The trading mechanism proposed in this paper can reflect all kinds of trading information in the market promptly, and can also help to quickly reach a deal matching and thus realize the rational allocation of market resources.
文章引用:梁焯然, 马艺文. 货物采购竞标交易模式研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(2): 1447-1456. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.132178

参考文献

[1] Schneider, M., Day, R. and Garfinkel, R. (2015) Risk Aversion and Loss Aversion in Core-Selecting Auctions. Decision Support Systems, 79, 161-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 周乐欣, 滕可, 吕凡. 平台型物流采购双向竞标交易模式创新研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(4): 624-632.
[3] 孙畅, 吴占坤, 赵英姝. 我国企业应用现代物流采购技术策略研究[J]. 改革与战略, 2010, 26(6): 62-64.
[4] 周乐欣, 李鑫, 何康. 多式联运中转二级市场竞标交易机制研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2020, 50(9): 36-48.
[5] 卫根超. 智慧物流对饲料企业现有物流配送模式的启示[J]. 中国饲料, 2021(24): 139-142.
[6] 黄逾白. 新媒体时代农业跨境电商的信息不对称问题及优化策略[J]. 农业经济, 2021(10): 126-128.
[7] 郭鑫鑫, 王海燕, 孔楠. 信息不对称下个人健康数据交易双边定价策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(4): 129-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 赖明辉, 薛巍立, 田歆, 李丽丽. 整车运输协作问题迭代拍卖机制设计[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(12): 3174-3186.
[9] 周乐欣. 拍卖理论在物流交易中的应用研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2010.
[10] 周乐欣, 宋山梅, 李露. 大数据条件下物流采购竞价交易模式创新研究[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 36(2): 63-68.
[11] 彭安华, 肖兴明, 岳睿. 基于交互双层模糊规划的敏捷供应链构建与优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2014, 25(17): 2314-2319 2350.
[12] Cong, R.G. and Wei, Y.M. (2012) Experimental Comparison of Impact of Auction Format on Carbon Allowance Market. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 4148-4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Laia, M.H., Caib, X.Q. and Hu, Q. (2017) An Iterative Auction for Carrier Collaboration in Truckload Pickup and Delivery. Transportation Research Part E, 107, 60-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef