脓毒性休克治疗的新进展
Advances in the Treatment of Septic Shock
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1451528, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李 雪, 蒋幼凡*:重庆医科大学附属第二医院呼吸与危重症医学科,重庆;唐 帆, 金仕文:重庆市南岸区第三人民医院内一科,重庆;邵 宇:重庆市急救医疗中心(重庆大学附属中心医院)消化内科,重庆;胡天洋*:重庆医科大学附属第二医院精准医学中心,重庆
关键词: 脓毒血症脓毒性休克药物治疗研究进展Sepsis Septic Shock Pharmacologic Therapy Research Advances
摘要: 脓毒血症被定义为由于宿主对感染的反应失调而导致的危及生命的器官功能障碍,作为脓毒症的严重亚型,脓毒性休克是指脓毒症并发了严重的循环、细胞和代谢异常,其死亡率显著增加,是重症监护单元患者管理的重点及难点。本文作者检索了近5年关于脓毒性休克治疗的文献,从脓毒性休克药物和非药物治疗手段的新进展两方面进行全面综述,旨在为临床中脓毒性休克治疗提供新的循证依据。
Abstract: Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to dysregulation of the host response to infection. As a severe subtype of sepsis, septic shock is sepsis complicated by severe circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities, which is associated with a significant increase in mortality, and is a major focus and difficulty in the management of patients in intensive care units. In this review, the authors searched the literature on the treatment of septic shock in the last 5 years and conducted a comprehensive review in terms of new advances in both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapeutic means for septic shock, aiming to provide a new evidence-based basis for the treatment of septic shock in the clinic.
文章引用:李雪, 唐帆, 金仕文, 邵宇, 蒋幼凡, 胡天洋. 脓毒性休克治疗的新进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(5): 1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1451528

参考文献

[1] Singer, M., Deutschman, C.S., Seymour, C.W., et al. (2016) The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315, 801-810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Brown, R.M., Wang, L., Coston, T.D., et al. (2019) Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Sepsis. A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Clinical Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 200, 1487-1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Sankar, J., Muralidharan, J., Lalitha, A.V., et al. (2023) Multiple Electrolytes Solution versus Saline as Bolus Fluid for Resuscitation in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Critical Care Medicine, 51, 1449-1460. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37294145/ [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Corl, K.A., Prodromou, M., Merchant, R.C., et al. (2019) The Restrictive IV Fluid Trial in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock (RIFTS): A Randomized Pilot Study. Critical Care Medicine, 47, 951-959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Meyhoff, T.S., Hjortrup, P.B., Wetterslev, J., et al. (2022) Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine, 386, 2459-2470.
[6] Moreau, R., Hadengue, A., Soupison, T., et al. (1992) Septic Shock in Patients with Cirrhosis: Hemodynamic and Metabolic Characteristics and Intensive Care Unit Outcome. Critical Care Medicine, 20, 746-750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Olson, J.C., Wendon, J.A., Kramer, D.J., et al. (2011) Intensive Care of the Patient with Cirrhosis. Hepatology, 54, 1864-1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Philips, C.A., Maiwall, R., Sharma, M.K., et al. (2021) Comparison of 5% Human Albumin and Normal Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis Induced Hypotension among Patients with Cirrhosis (FRISC Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Hepatology International, 15, 983-994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Maiwall, R., Kumar, A., Pasupuleti, S.S.R., et al. (2022) A Randomized-Controlled Trial Comparing 20% Albumin to Plasmalyte in Patients with Cirrhosis and Sepsis-Induced Hypotension [ALPS Trial]. Journal of Hepatology, 77, 670-682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Rochwerg, B., Alhazzani, W., Sindi, A., et al. (2014) Fluid Resuscitation in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 161, 347-355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Monnet, X., Lai, C., Ospina-Tascon, G., et al. (2023) Evidence for a Personalized Early Start of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock. Critical Care, 27, Article No. 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Permpikul, C., Tongyoo, S., Viarasilpa, T., et al. (2019) Early Use of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock Resuscitation (CENSER). A Randomized Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 199, 1097-1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Zhou, W.-J., Cui, J.-K., Liu, M., et al. (2021) Comparison of Norepinephrine, Dopamine and Dobutamine Combined with Enteral Nutrition in the Treatment of Elderly Patients Harboring Sepsis. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 34, 957-961.
[14] He, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, G., et al. (2022) Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Norepinephrine Combined with Ulinastatin in the Treatment of Septic Shock. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 35, 657-663.
[15] Wang, J., Shi, M., Huang, L., et al. (2022) Addition of Terlipressin to Norepinephrine in Septic Shock and Effect of Renal Perfusion: A Pilot Study. Renal Failure, 44, 1208-1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Senatore, F., Jagadeesh, G., Rose, M., et al. (2019) FDA Approval of Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Hypotension in Adults with Distributive Shock. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 19, 11-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Ibarra-Estrada, M., Kattan, E., Aguilera-González, P., et al. (2023) Early Adjunctive Methylene Blue in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Critical Care, 27, Article No. 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Ismail, R., Awad, H., Allam, R., et al. (2022) Methylene Blue versus Vasopressin Analog for Refractory Septic Shock in the Preterm Neonate: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, 15, 265-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Adly, D.H.E., Bazan, N.S., El Borolossy, R.M., et al. (2022) Midodrine Improves Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 191, 2785-2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Davoudi-Monfared, E., Mohammadi, M., Khoshavi, M., et al. (2021) The Effect of Midodrine on Lactate Clearance in Patients with Septic Shock: A Pilot Study. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 10, 673-683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Mirjalili, M., Zand, F., Karimzadeh, I., et al. (2023) The Clinical and Paraclinical Effectiveness of Four-Hour Infusion vs. Half-Hour Infusion of High-Dose Ampicillin-Sulbactam in Treatment of Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: An Assessor-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Critical Care, 73, Article 154170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Liu, S., Wu, Y., Qi, S., et al. (2023) Polymyxin B Therapy Based on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms Sepsis: The PMB-CROS Randomized Clinical Trial. Critical Care, 27, Article No. 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Roggeveen, L.F., Guo, T., Fleuren, L.M., et al. (2022) Right Dose, Right Now: Bedside, Real-Time, Data-Driven, and Personalised Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock—A Two-Centre Randomised Clinical Trial. Critical Care, 26, Article No. 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Balik, M., Maly, M., Brozek, T., et al. (2023) Propafenone versus Amiodarone for Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Septic Shock: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Intensive Care Medicine, 49, 1283-1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Liu, H., Ding, X.F., Zhang, S.G., et al. (2019) [Effect of Esmolol in Septic Shock Patients with Tachycardia: A Randomized Clinical Trial]. National Medical Journal of China, 99, 1317-1322.
[26] Wang, J., Gao, X., He, Z., et al. (2023) Evaluating the Effects of Esmolol on Cardiac Function in Patients with Septic Cardiomyopathy by Speck-Tracking Echocardiography—A Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 23, Article No. 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Cocchi, M.N., Dargin, J., Chase, M., et al. (2022) Esmolol to Treat the Hemodynamic Effects of Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Shock, 57, 508-517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Kakihana, Y., Nishida, O., Taniguchi, T., et al. (2020) Efficacy and Safety of Landiolol, an Ultra-Short-Acting β1-Selective Antagonist, for Treatment of Sepsis-Related Tachyarrhythmia (J-Land 3S): A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8, 863-872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Datta, P.K., Rewari, V., Ramachandran, R., et al. (2021) Effectiveness of Enteral Ivabradine for Heart Rate Control in Septic Shock: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 49, 366-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Iglesias, J., Vassallo, A.V., Patel, V.V., et al. (2020) Outcomes of Metabolic Resuscitation Using Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, and Glucocorticoids in the Early Treatment of Sepsis: The ORANGES Trial. Chest, 158, 164-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Hussein, A.A., Sabry, N.A., Abdalla, M.S., et al. (2021) A Prospective, Randomised Clinical Study Comparing Triple Therapy Regimen to Hydrocortisone Monotherapy in Reducing Mortality in Septic Shock Patients. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75, e14376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Lyu, Q.-Q., Zheng, R.-Q., Chen, Q.-H., et al. (2022) Early Administration of Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine in Adult Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Critical Care, 26, Article No. 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Wani, S.J., Mufti, S.A., Jan, R.A., et al. (2020) Combination of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone Added to Standard Treatment in the Management of Sepsis: Results from an Open Label Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial and a Review of the Literature. Infectious Diseases, 52, 271-278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Tilouche, N., Jaoued, O., Ali, H.B.S., et al. (2019) Comparison between Continuous and Intermittent Administration of Hydrocortisone during Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Shock, 52, 481-486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Venkatesh, B., Finfer, S., Cohen, J., et al. (2019) Hydrocortisone Compared with Placebo in Patients with Septic Shock Satisfying the Sepsis-3 Diagnostic Criteria and APROCCHSS Study Inclusion Criteria: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ADRENAL Trial. Anesthesiology, 131, 1292-1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Ortiz-Reyes, L., Patel, J.J., Jiang, X., et al. (2022) Early versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Circulatory Shock: A Nested Cohort Analysis of an International Multicenter, Pragmatic Clinical Trial. Critical Care, 26, Article No. 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] El-Nawawy, A.A., Elshinawy, M.I., Khater, D.M., et al. (2021) Outcome of Early Hemostatic Intervention in Children with Sepsis and Nonovert Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Admitted to PICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 22, e168-e177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] Yoshihiro, S., Sakuraya, M., Hayakawa, M., et al. (2019) Recombinant Human-Soluble Thrombomodulin Contributes to Reduced Mortality in Sepsis Patients with Severe Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Observational Study Using a Multicenter Dataset. Shock, 51, 174-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Sun, T., Zhang, N., Cui, N., et al. (2023) Efficacy of Levosimendan in the Treatment of Patients with Severe Septic Cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 37, 344-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] He, J., Zhao, X., Lin, X., et al. (2021) The Effect of Xinmailong Infusion on Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Shock, 55, 33-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Sun, R., Liang, M., Yang, H., et al. (2020) [Effect of Xuebijing on Inflammatory Response and Prognosis in Patients with Septic Shock]. Chinese Critical Care Medicine, 32, 458-462.
[42] Mai, Z., Tan, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2023) Effects of Low-Dose Furosemide Combined with Aminophylline on the Renal Function in Septic Shock Patients. Renal Failure, 45, Article 2185084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Zhang, F., Mei, X., Zhou, P., et al. (2023) Anisodamine Hydrobromide in the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Medicine, 55, Article 2264318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Guo, M. and Zhou, B. (2023) Clinical Efficacy of Ulinastatin in the Treatment of Unliquefied Pyogenic Liver Abscess Complicated by Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, 11, e822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Aisa-Alvarez, A., Soto, M.E., Guarner-Lans, V., et al. (2020) Usefulness of Antioxidants as Adjuvant Therapy for Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina, 56, Article 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Xie, Y.-J., Mo, W.-G., Wei, Y., et al. (2020) [Effect of Early Continuous Blood Purification on the Prognosis of Children with Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 22, 573-577.
[47] Zhang, Y., Shao, D.R., He, Z.P., et al. (2019) Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement on Acute Renal Injury Developed in Severe Sepsis. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, 33, 525-530.
[48] Schwindenhammer, V., Girardot, T., Chaulier, K., et al. (2019) oXiris® Use in Septic Shock: Experience of Two French Centres. Blood Purification, 47, 29-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Feng, J., Zhang, S., Ai, T., et al. (2022) Effect of CRRT with oXiris Filter on Hemodynamic Instability in Surgical Septic Shock with AKI: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 45, 801-808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Ferrari, F., Husain-Syed, F., Milla, P., et al. (2022) Clinical Assessment of Continuous Hemodialysis with the Medium Cutoff EMiC®2 Membrane in Patients with Septic Shock. Blood Purification, 51, 912-922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Bai, L., Qiu, X., Ding, X., et al. (2022) Value of Thymosin α1 Combined with Blood Purification to Increase Successful Rescues of Shock Patients. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 28, 146-152.
[52] Rey, S., Kulabukhov, V.M., Popov, A., et al. (2023) Hemoperfusion Using the LPS-Selective Mesoporous Polymeric Adsorbent in Septic Shock: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Shock, 59, 846-854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[53] Lu, X., Zhai, H., Dong, Y., et al. (2022) Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis of PiCCO in the Treatment of Myocardial Injury Complicated with Septic Shock. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, Article ID: 2910849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Yao, Y., Su, M., Guan, Y., et al. (2021) Clinical Application of Transabdominal Ultrasound Combined with PiCCO in Septic Shock Fluid Resuscitation and Its Predictive Value for Survival Outcome. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 47, 3196-3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Pan, J., et al. (2022) Optimizing Left Ventricular-Arterial Coupling during the Initial Resuscitation in Septic Shock—A Pilot Prospective Randomized Study. BMC Anesthesiology, 22, Article No. 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Wang, S., Zhu, J., Zhao, Z.-G., et al. (2020) [Effect of Early Acupoint Electrical Stimulation on Lower Limb Muscle Strength in Patients with Septic Shock]. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, 40, 1173-1177.
[57] Khalil, M.T. and Rathore, F.A. (2022) Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulator as a Protective Treatment against Intensive Care Unit Muscle Wasting in Sepsis/Septic Shock Patients. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 32, 1300-1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]