合同僵局下违约方解除权与司法解除的逻辑证成
The Logical Proof of the Right of Dissolution of the Breaching Party and the Judicial Dissolution under the Contractual Deadlock
摘要: 《民法典》第580条第2款赋予违约方合同解除权,该制度的设置目的在于打破实践中存在的合同僵局现象,以立法形式促进交易效率与公平。但实际运用中面对可能出现的背离合同公平、破坏市场诚信和牺牲交易效率等不利后果,则需要通过司法裁判手段把握在合同僵局情形下违约方解除权的行使路径,引入司法解除模式构建合理的合同僵局破解机制,探明多效并举的合同解除模式,在双方当事人之间兼顾公平合理的利益再分配原则。
Abstract: Article 580 (2) of the Civil Code grants the defaulting party the right to rescind the contract, with the aim of resolving contractual impasses and promoting transactional efficiency and fairness through legislative means. However, in practical application, potential adverse consequences such as departure from contractual fairness, erosion of market integrity, and compromise of transactional efficiency necessitate a judicially adjudicated exercise path for the defaulting party’s right to terminate the contract in deadlock situations. This calls for introducing a judicial dissolution mechanism to address contract impasses and exploring multi-faceted modes of contract dissolution that consider principles of equitable interest redistribution between parties.
文章引用:曹子钰. 合同僵局下违约方解除权与司法解除的逻辑证成[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(5): 198-203. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2024.105272

参考文献

[1] 王毅纯, 刘甘一. 合同僵局下违约方解除的制度构造[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2021(5): 65-82.
[2] 王利明. 论合同僵局中违约方申请解约[J]. 法学评论, 2020(1): 26-38.
[3] 曹兴权, 张径华. 违约方解除合同场合的利益调整机制——基于《民法典》第580条展开[J]. 中国法律评论, 2022(6): 215-226.
[4] 张继承, 陈甲荥. 合同僵局视域下违约方解除合同的司法裁判之反思[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(4): 79-87.
[5] 刘凯湘. 民法典合同解除制度评析与完善建议[J]. 清华法学2020(14): 176-177.
[6] 黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典合同编释义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020.
[7] 最高人民法院民事审判第二庭, 编著. 《全国法院民商事审判工作会议纪要》理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2019.