数学教学中数学质量评价工具MQI概述
An Overview of the Mathematical Quality of Instruction (MQI)
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2024.133117, PDF,   
作者: 郝伟静：新疆师范大学数学科学学院，新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: MQI；数学质量；教师评价；启示；MQI； Mathematical Quality； Teacher Evaluations； Inspire
摘要: 数学教学质量评价工具 (Mathematical Quality of Instruction，简称MQI)是由美国希尔(Heather Hill)教授及其密歇根大学和哈佛大学同事开发，旨在捕捉数学课堂中数学内容的教学质量。该工具因独特的学科视角及通过网络传播而产生了广泛影响。本文主要介绍MQI的发展背景以及促进其发展的两个原始目标、MQI的理论基础和研究方法、MQI的框架和维度，最后对MQI对我国数学教学评价的意义进行了讨论。
Abstract: The MQI (Mathematical Quality of Instruction) evaluation tool was developed by Professor Heather Hill and his colleagues at the University of Michigan and Harvard to capture the quality of teaching math content in math classrooms. The tool has had a wide impact due to its unique disciplinary perspective and dissemination through the web. This paper mainly introduces the development background of MQI and the two original goals to promote its development, the theoretical basis and research methods of MQI, the framework and dimensions of MQI, and finally discusses the significance of MQI in the evaluation of mathematics teaching in China.
文章引用：郝伟静. 数学教学中数学质量评价工具MQI概述[J]. 职业教育发展, 2024, 13(3): 716-725. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2024.133117

参考文献

[1] Brophy, J. and Good, T.L. (1986) Teacher Behavior and Student Achievement. Macmillan, New York, 328-375.
[2] Creemers, B.P.M. and Kyriakides, L. (2008) The Dynamics of Educational Effectiveness: A Contribution to Policy, Practice and Theory in Contemporary Schools. Routledge, London. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Muijs, D. and Reynolds, D. (2000) School Effectiveness and Teacher Effectiveness in Mathematics: Some Preliminary Findings from the Evaluation of the Mathematics Enhancement Program (Primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 273-303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Hanushek, E.A. (1972) Education and Race: An Analysis of the Educational Production Process. DC Heath & Co, Lexington.
[5] Hill, H.C., Rowan, B. and Ball, D.L. (2005) Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Mullens, J.E., Murnane, R.J. and Willett, J.B. (1996) The Contribution of Training and Subject Matter Knowledge to Teaching Effectiveness: A Multilevel Analysis of Longitudinal Evidence from Belize. Comparative Education Review, 40, 139-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Rowan, B., Chiang, F. and Miller, R.J. (1997) Using Research on Employees’ Performance to Study the Effects of Teachers on Students’ Achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C.A., Underhill, R.G., Jones, D. and Agard, P.C. (1992) Learning to Teach Hard Mathematics: Do Novice Teachers and Their Instructors Give Up Too Easily. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Fennema, E. and Franke, M.L. (1992) Teachers’ Knowledge and Its Impact. In: Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, 147-164.
[10] Leinhardt, G. and Smith, D.A. (1985) Expertise in Mathematics Instruction: Subject Matter Knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Putnam, R.T., Heaton, R., Prawat, R.S. and Remillard, J. (1992) Teaching Mathematics for Understanding: Discussing Case Studies of Four Fifth-Grade Teachers. Elementary School Journal, 93, 213-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Sowder, J.T., Phillip, R.A., Armstrong, B.E. and Shappelle, B.P. (1998) Middle-Grade Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge and Its Relationship to Instruction. SUNY Press, Albany.
[13] Boston, M.D. (2012) Assessing the Quality of Mathematics Instruction. Elementary School Journal, 113, 76-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Learning Mathematics for Teaching Project (2011) Measuring the Mathematical Quality of Instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 25-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Walkowiak, T.A., Berry, R.Q., Meyer, J.P., Rimm-Kaufman, S.E. and Ottmar, E.R. (2014) Introducing an Observational Measure of Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching Practices: Evidence of Validity and Score Reliability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 109-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Shulman, L.S. (1986) Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Ma, L. (1999) Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Erlbaum, Mahwah. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Ball, D.L. (1990) Prospective Elementary and Secondary Teachers’ Understanding of Division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Even, R. (1993) Subject-Matter Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Prospective Secondary Teachers and the Function Concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 94-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Post, T.R., Harel, G., Behr, M.J. and Lesh, R. (1991) Intermediate Teachers’ Knowledge of Rational Number Concepts. State University of New York Press, New York.
[21] Simon, M. (1993) Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Knowledge of Division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233-254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Tirosh, D., Fischbein, E., Graeber, A.O. and Wilson, J.W. (1999) Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Rational Numbers.
[23] Hill, H.C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G.C., Sleep, L., et al. (2008) Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching and the Mathematical Quality of Instruction: An Exploratory Study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430-511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Rosenshine, B. and Furst, N. (1986) The Use of Direct Observation to Study Teaching. In: Handbook of Research on Teaching, Macmillan, New York, 122-183.
[25] Rowland, T., Huckstep, T. and Thwaites, A. (2005) Elementary Teachers’ Mathematics Subject Knowledge: The Knowledge Quartet and the Case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255-281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Rowland, T. (2008) Researching Teachers’ Mathematics Disciplinary Knowledge. In: The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 1: Knowledge and Beliefs in Mathematics Teaching and Teaching Development, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 273-300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Sawada, D. and Pilburn, M. (2000) Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). Arizona State University: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
[28] Horizon Research (2000) Inside the Classroom Observation and Analytic Protocol. Horizon Research, Inc, Chapel Hill.
[29] Henningsen, M. and Stein, M.K. (1997) Mathematical Tasks and Student Cognition: Classroom Based Factors That Support and Inhibit High-Level Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Weaver, D., Dick, T., Higgins, K., Marrongelle, K., Foreman, L., Miller, N., et al. (2005) OMLI Classroom Observation Protocol. RMC Research Corporation, Portland.
[31] Powell, A.B., Francisco, J.M. and Maher, C.A. (2003) An Analytical Model for Studying the Development of Learners’ Mathematical Ideas and Reasoning Using Videotape Data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Leung, F.K.S. (2005) Some Characteristics of East Asian Mathematics Classrooms Based on Data from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 199-215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H. and Phelps, G. (2008) Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] Cohen, D.K., Raudenbush, S.W. and Ball, D.L. (2003) Resources, Instruction, and Research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1976) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago.
[36] Hill, H.C., Charalambous, C.Y. and Kraft, M.A. (2012) When Rater Reliability Is Not Enough: Teacher Observation Systems and a Case for the Generalizability Study. Educational Researcher, 41, 56-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐