老年脊柱骨水泥患者术后早期最佳功能锻炼时机探索研究
Exploration Study on the Optimal Timing for Early Postoperative Functional Exercise in Elderly Patients with Spinal Cement
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1451595, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郭 娟, 杨太聪, 卓倩茹, 杨静雪, 胡倩秋, 顾 婷:自贡市第四人民医院骨科中心,四川 自贡;杜金磊:自贡市第四人民医院重症医学科,四川 自贡
关键词: 脊柱手术骨水泥功能锻炼临床效果Spinal Surgery Bone Cement Functional Exercise Clinical Effect
摘要: 目的:评估不同功能锻炼时机对脊柱骨水泥患者术后的临床影响。方法:本研究采用便利抽样法,根据105例脊柱骨水泥手术患者入院的时间顺序,按同等比例入组,分别为A、B、C三组。A组、B组和C组分别术后4小时、6小时、24小时开始功能锻炼和使用腰部辅助装置,并比较三组的疼痛评分、改良版Oswestry功能障碍指数、术后并发症发生率、术后住院时间和患者满意度等指标。结果:三组患者的术后疼痛评分、功能障碍指数评分组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。三组患者术后均无并发症发生,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。术后住院时间以及患者满意度A组和B组比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);A、B两组患者术后住院时间均短于C组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:脊柱骨水泥术后早期功能锻炼(术后4或6小时开始)不仅能够显著缩短住院时间,提高患者满意度,且对于促进患者的快速康复具有重要意义,是一种安全且有效的康复方法。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of different timings of functional exercise on patients after spinal cement surgery. Methods: This study used a convenience sampling method. Based on the admission sequence of 105 patients who underwent spinal cement surgery, they were equally divided into three groups: A, B, and C. Groups A, B, and C started functional exercises and used lumbar support devices 4 hours, 6 hours, and 24 hours after surgery, respectively. The pain scores, modified Oswestry Disability Index, postoperative complication rates, postoperative hospital stay, and patient satisfaction were compared among the three groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain scores and disability index scores among the three groups (P > 0.05). There were no postoperative complications in any of the groups, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay and patient satisfaction between groups A and B (P > 0.05); however, the postoperative hospital stays for groups A and B were significantly shorter than that for group C (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Early postoperative functional exercise (starting 4 or 6 hours after surgery) can not only significantly reduce hospital stay and improve patient satisfaction but also has important significance for promoting rapid recovery of patients. It is a safe and effective rehabilitation method.
文章引用:郭娟, 杜金磊, 杨太聪, 卓倩茹, 杨静雪, 胡倩秋, 顾婷. 老年脊柱骨水泥患者术后早期最佳功能锻炼时机探索研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(5): 1611-1618. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1451595

参考文献

[1] Ponzano, M., Tibert, N., Brien, S., et al. (2023) International Consensus on the Non-Pharmacological and Non-Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. Osteoporosis International, 34, 1065-1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Patel, D., Liu, J. and Ebraheim, N.A. (2022) Managements of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Narrative Review. World Journal of Orthopedics, 13, 564-573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 陈水绵, 郭庆昕, 庄跃玲, 等. 老年低能量胸腰椎压缩性骨折临床特征和维生素D营养状态分析[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2023, 29(12): 1768-1773.
[4] Beall, D.P. and De Leacy, R.A. (2023) Management of Chronic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Vertebroplasty: Focus on Clinical Symptoms. Radiology, 308, e231243. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.231243 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Zou, K., Qiu, Y., Jin, X., et al. (2024) Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Osteoporotic Patients Who Were Treated with Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Refracture after Vertebral Augmentation. World Neurosurgery, 181, e11-e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Sahinturk, F., Sonmez, E., Ayhan, S., et al. (2023) The Influence of Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques on Recompression in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty versus Balloon Kyphoplasty. World Neurosurgery, 176, e447-e455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 陈星, 万趸, 熊小明, 等. 加速康复外科理念在老年骨质疏松性腰椎压缩性骨折椎体成形术和后凸成形术后康复中的应用[J]. 中国骨伤, 2020, 33(12): 1179-1183.
[8] 胡婷业, 陆玉和, 吕维富, 等. 高黏度骨水泥治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者早期下床活动的效果观察[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2017, 26(8): 749-752.
[9] 蔡明城. 早期下床活动对椎体压缩性骨折患者术后康复的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2022.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD202301&filename=1022710499.nh&v=
[10] 王有为, 干红卫. 老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者经皮椎体成形术后发生延迟愈合的影响因素[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2022, 20(5): 334-338.
[11] 罗远盟. 单侧经皮穿刺椎体成形术后骨水泥分布对术后早期疼痛缓解的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2022.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD202301&filename=1022652012.nh&v=
[12] 李华艳, 杨继鹏, 周颖. 急诊疼痛评估的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(5): 107-110.
[13] 程继伟, 王振林, 刘伟, 等. Oswestry功能障碍指数的改良及信度和效度检验[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2017, 27(3): 235-241.
[14] 毛海青, 周非非, 蔡思逸, 等. 椎体成形术和椎体后凸成形术加速康复实施流程专家共识[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2019, 12(8): 561-571.
[15] Fan, C.Y., Wu, X.X., Ji, Z.W., et al. (2024) Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Undergoing Percutaneous Kyphoplasty. World Neurosurgery, 181, e339-e345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Kim, G.H. and Cho, T.G. (2022) A Comparative Study on the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Early Ambulation and at Least 1 Week of Absolute Bed Rest. Korean Journal of Neurotrauma, 18, 56-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Tomohiro, K., Kiyotaka, H. and Ryo, M. (2021) Effectiveness of Early Rehabilitation for Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 44, 139-143.https://journals.lww.com/jgpt/fulltext/2021/07000/effectiveness_of_early_rehabilitation_for.3.aspx [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 孔令楠. 骨水泥椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的围术期护理方法及效果[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2021, 44(6): 73-74.
[19] 陈华彬. 术后整体护理干预对经皮椎体成形术患者邻近椎体再骨折的预防效果[J]. 中国医药指南, 2024, 22(1): 154-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 熊英杰. 磷酸镁骨水泥在椎体成形术中的实验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 芜湖: 皖南医学院, 2023.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=Y_ITemen1J54L4boisufZSvK14yPe4obc40j-h_X7xJxI0vc7N3-Bx8WTXUN4Mx8wGPuZApnp4Gj8dXnIYnHgyjLLU-j2GbSWXxjvUstJDDWpz_woIQB4g==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=gb
[21] 向刚刚, 童猛, 曹鹏, 等. 新型骨水泥研究进展[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 83-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef