高密度电法常用装置与融合装置对比——以梨树地区黑土地地表基质调查为例
Comparison between Common Devices and Fusion Devices of High-Density Electrical Method—Taking the Investigation of Surface Matrix of Black Soil in Lishu Area as an Example
摘要: 黑土地被公认为稀有资源,也是不可再生资源,正面临着“变薄、变瘦、变硬”的变化趋势。因此,查明黑土资源地表分布、空间结构和本底属性特征非常迫切,近两年来黑土地地表基质调查工作也因此逐步展开。黑土地地表基质调查工作手段多种多样,其中地球物理方法扮演着非常重要的角色,而高密度电法又是其中较为常用的。本文通过分析温纳、微分两种装置的优缺点,尝试将两种装置的数据进行改进融合,探索适于黑土地地表基质调查工作的高密度电法测量装置,取得了一定的效果。
Abstract:
Black land is recognized as a rare resource and a non-renewable resource, facing the trend of thinning, thinning and hardening. Therefore, it is very important to find out the surface distribution, spatial structure and background attributes of black soil resources. In the past two years, the investigation of black soil surface matrix has been gradually carried out. There are various methods to investigate the surface matrix of black soil, among which geophysical methods play a very important role, and high-density electrical methods are one of the more commonly used. By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of Wenner and Differential devices, Try to correct and fuse the data of the two devices, Explore the high-density electrical measuring device suitable for the investigation of black soil surface matrix, Some results have been achieved.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李丹丹, 陈明. “耕地中的大熊猫”: 寒地黑土[N]. 中国矿业报, 2021-05-28(004).
|
|
[2]
|
侯红星, 葛良胜, 孙肖, 等. 地表基质在中国黑土地资源调查评价中的应用探讨——基于黑龙江宝清地区地表基质调查[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(9): 2264-2276.
|
|
[3]
|
李金铭, 罗延钟. 电法勘探新进展[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996.
|
|
[4]
|
Pelton, W.H., Ijo, L. and Wift, C.M. (1978) Inversion of Two Dimensional Resistivity and Induced Polarization Data. Geophysics, 43, 788-803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
底青云, 王妙月. 高密度电阻率法在珠海某防波堤工程中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 1997, 12(2): 79-88.
|
|
[6]
|
张寅生. 电阻率法在考古工作中的应用初探[J]. 物探与化探, 1987, 11(6): 462-464.
|
|
[7]
|
董浩斌, 王传雷. 高密度电法的发展与应用[J]. 科学前缘, 2003, 10(1): 171-176.
|
|
[8]
|
郑冰, 李柳德. 高密度电法不同装置的探测效果对比[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2015, 12(1): 33-39.
|
|
[9]
|
阮百尧, 吕玉增, 强建科, 黄俊革. 直流电阻率测深勘测灵敏度及其应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2002(5): 392-394.
|
|
[10]
|
郑智杰, 曾洁, 甘伏平. 装置和电极距对岩溶管道高密度电法响应特征的影响研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2016, 43(5): 161-165 172.
|
|
[11]
|
肖宏跃, 武娇阳, 雷宛, 等. 实验室高密度电法微测系统的模型研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2011, 26(4): 1464-1472.
|
|
[12]
|
马志飞, 刘鸿福, 叶章, 等. 高密度电法不同跑极方式的对比及效果分析[J]. 工程地质计算机应用, 2008(3): 11-15.
|
|
[13]
|
丁廉超, 龚文强, 李新斌, 等. 高密度电法不同装置在第四系沉积盆地找水有效性对比研究[J]. 地下水, 2022, 44(1): 144-146 199.
|