公共政策领域程序公正补偿效应：不确定性的调节作用
The Compensation Effect of Procedural Justice in the Field of Public Policy: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty
摘要: 本研究在公共政策领域，通过Scenario方法和问卷调查法相结合，研究不确定性对程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策可接受性交互作用的调节作用，同时进一步探究两个不同来源的不确定性即信息不确定性和自我不确定性对程序公正、结果宜人性交互作用的影响。研究一的结果表明：程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策接受性有交互作用，而不确定性对其起调节作用。不确定性高时，程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策可接受性的交互作用更显著，程序公正可以缓解不利结果带来的消极影响。不确定性低时，程序公正和结果宜人性对公共政策可接受性的交互作用不显著。研究二的结果表明：信息不确定性和自我不确定性对这种交互作用存在不同的调节作用。
Abstract: This study, in the field of public policy, combines the Scenario method and questionnaire survey method to investigate the moderating effect of uncertainty on the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability on the acceptance of public policy. Additionally, it further explores the impact of two different sources of uncertainty, namely information uncertainty and self-uncertainty, on the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability. The results of Study 1 indicate that procedural justice and outcome favorability interact to affect the acceptance of public policy, with uncertainty playing a moderating role. When uncertainty is high, the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability is more significant in influencing the acceptability of public policies, with procedural justice mitigating the negative impact of unfavorable outcomes. However, when uncertainty is low, the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability on the acceptability of public policies is not significant. The results of Study 2 suggest that information uncertainty and self-uncertainty have different moderating effects on this interaction.
文章引用：吴玄娜, 郭颖, 周鑫媛 (2024). 公共政策领域程序公正补偿效应：不确定性的调节作用. 心理学进展, 14(5), 336-347. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.145320

参考文献

[1] 梁娟, 马红宇, 高记(2013). 自我不确定感对程序公正效应的调节作用: 回顾与展望. 心理科学进展, 21(3), 530-538.
[2] Blader, S. L. (2007). What Leads Organizational Members to Collectivize? Injustice and Identification as Precursors of Union Certification. Organization Science, 18, 108-126.[CrossRef] 
[3] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley.
[4] Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Brockner, J., Chen, Y., Mannix, E., Leung, K., & Skarlicki, D. (2000). Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What You Do Depend upon How You Do It. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 138-159.[CrossRef] 
[6] Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive Effects of Procedural Justice and Outcome Negativity on Victims and Survivors of Job Loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397-409.[CrossRef] 
[7] Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Colquitt, J. A. (2012). Organizational Justice. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526-547). Oxford University Press.[CrossRef] 
[9] De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2005). Self-Uncertainty and Responsiveness to Procedural Justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 157-173.[CrossRef] 
[10] De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., van Dijke, M., van Olffen, W., &Mayer, D. M. (2010). When Do Procedural Fairness and Outcome Fairness Interact to Influence Employees’ Work Attitudes and Behaviors? The Moderating Effect of Uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 291-304.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Diekmann, K. A. (2004). Book Review. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 318-321.[CrossRef] 
[12] Dykman, B. J. (1998). Integrating Cognitive and Motivational Factors in Depression: Initial Tests of a Goal-Oriented Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 139-158.[CrossRef] 
[13] Greifeneder, R., Müller, P., Stahlberg, D., Van Den Bos, K., & Bless, H. (2011). Beyond Procedure’s Content. Experimental Psychology, 58, 341-352.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-Identity Theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69-126). Elsevier Academic Press.[CrossRef] 
[15] Kwong, J. Y. Y., & Leung, K. (2002). A Moderation of the Interaction Effect of Procedure Justice and Outcome Favorability: Importance of the Relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 87, 278-299.[CrossRef] 
[16] Leung, K., Tong, K., & Lind, E. A. (2007). Realpolitik versus Fair Process: Moderating Effects of Group Identification on Acceptance of Political Decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 476-489.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum Press.[CrossRef] 
[18] Thau, S., Aquino, K, & Wittek, R. (2007). An Extension of Uncertainty Management Theory to the Self: The Relationship between Justice, Social Comparison Orientation, and Antisocial Work Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 250-258.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). Academic Press.[CrossRef] 
[20] Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Westview Press.
[21] Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.[CrossRef] 
[22] Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The Influence of Outcomes and Procedures on Satisfaction with Formal Leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.[CrossRef] 
[23] Van den Bos, K. (2001). Fairness Heuristic Theory: Assessing the Information to Which People Are Reacting Has a Pivotal Role in Understanding Organizational Justice. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice (pp. 63-84). Information Age Publishing.
[24] Van den Bos, K. (2009). Making Sense of Life: The Existential Self Trying to Deal with Personal Uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 197-217.[CrossRef] 
[25] Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty Management by Means of Fairness Judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1-60.[CrossRef] 
[26] Van Hiel, A., De Cremer, D., & Stouten, J. (2008). The Personality Basis of Justice: The Five-Factor Model as an Integrative Model of Personality and Procedural Fairness Effects on Cooperation. European Journal of Personality, 22, 519-539.[CrossRef] 
[27] Wong, P. T., & Weiner, B. (1981). When People Ask “Why” Questions, and the Heuristics of Attributional Search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650-663.[CrossRef] 
[28] Wu, X. N., & Wang, E. P. (2013). Outcome Favorability as a Boundary Condition to Voice Effect on People’s Reactions to Public Policymaking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 329-337.[CrossRef]