非IA期非小细胞肺癌EGFR罕见突变诊断模型构建
Construction of a Diagnostic Model for Non-IA Stage NSCLC with Rare EGFR Mutations
摘要: 目的:结合血清肿瘤标志物(STMs)和其他临床特征构建预测模型,旨在预测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)罕见突变的发生。方法:回顾性收集766例接受EGFR基因检测的非IA期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,以评估几种临床特征和STMs对EGFR罕见突变的潜在预测价值。结果:构建了包含癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白-19片段(CYFRA21-1)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)、病理学和性别的Nomogram模型,用于预测EGFR罕见突变。曲线下面积(AUC = 0.793)表明模型具有良好的预测性能。结论:CEA、CYFRA21-1和SCC-Ag是预测非IA期NSCLC患者EGFR罕见突变的关键因素。将STMs与其他临床因素相结合的Nomogram模型可以有效预测EGFR罕见突变。
Abstract: Objective: To develop a predictive model for the occurrence of rare mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by integrating serum tumor markers (STMs) and other clinical features. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 766 non-IA stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent EGFR gene testing to assess the potential predictive value of various clinical features and STMs for rare EGFR mutations. Results: A Nomogram model incorporating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), pathology, and gender was constructed to predict rare EGFR mutations in non-IA stage NSCLC. The area under the curve (AUC = 0.793) indicated good predictive performance of the model. Conclusion: CEA, CYFRA21-1, and SCC-Ag emerged as crucial factors for predicting rare EGFR mutations in non-IA stage NSCLC patients. The Nomogram model, integrating STMs with other clinical factors, proved effective in predicting rare EGFR mutations.
文章引用:张宏岩, 林明刚, 矫艳艳. 非IA期非小细胞肺癌EGFR罕见突变诊断模型构建[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(5): 1798-1806. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1451618

参考文献

[1] Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Wagle, N.S., et al. (2023) Cancer Statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73, 17-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Herbst, R.S., Heymach, J.V. and Lippman, S.M. (2008) Lung Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 1367-1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Marin-Acevedo, J.A., Pellini, B., Kimbrough, E.O., et al. (2023) Treatment Strategies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Common EGFR Mutations: A Review of the History of EGFR TKIs Approval and Emerging Data. Cancers (Basel), 15, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Aye, P.S., Tin Tin, S., McKeage, M.J., et al. (2020) Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Estimating EGFR Mutation Probabilities in Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in New Zealand. BMC Cancer, 20, Article No. 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, J., et al. (2018) Real-World EGFR Testing in Patients with Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in North China: A Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study. Thoracic Cancer, 9, 1461-1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Qi, W., Li, X. and Kang, J. (2014) Advances in the Study of Serum Tumor Markers of Lung Cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 10, C95-C101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Cedres, S., Nunez, I., Longo, M., et al. (2011) Serum Tumor Markers CEA, CYFRA21-1, and CA-125 Are Associated with Worse Prognosis in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Clinical Lung Cancer, 12, 172-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Vinolas, N., Molina, R., Fuentes, R., et al. (2000) Tumor Markers (CEA, CA 125, CYFRA 21.1, SCC and NSE) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients as an Aid in Histological Diagnosis and Prognosis: Comparison with the Main Clinical and Pathological Prognostic Factors. Lung Cancer, 29, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Jiang, C., Zhao, M., Hou, S., et al. (2022) The Indicative Value of Serum Tumor Markers for Metastasis and Stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers, 14, 5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Cho, A., Hur, J., Moon, Y.W., et al. (2016) Correlation between EGFR Gene Mutation, Cytologic Tumor Markers, 18F-FDG Uptake in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. BMC Cancer, 16, Article No. 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Jin, B., Dong, Y., Wang, H.M., et al. (2014) Correlation between Serum CEA Levels and EGFR Mutations in Chinese Nonsmokers with Lung Adenocarcinoma. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 35, 373-380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zhang, H., He, M., Wan, R., et al. (2022) Establishment and Evaluation of EGFR Mutation Prediction Model Based on Tumor Markers and CT Features in NSCLC. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, Article ID: 8089750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Jiang, M., Chen, P., Guo, X., et al. (2023) Identification of EGFR Mutation Status in Male Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT and Serum Tumor Markers CYFRA21-1 and SCC-Ag. EJNMMI Research, 13, Article No. 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Wang, S., Ma, P., Ma, G., et al. (2020) Value of Serum Tumor Markers for Predicting EGFR Mutations and Positive ALK Expression in 1089 Chinese Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis. European Journal of Cancer, 124, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Jafari-Kashi, A., Rafiee-Pour, H.A. and Shabani-Nooshabadi, M. (2022) A New Strategy to Design Label-Free Electrochemical Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Diagnosis of CYFRA 21-1 as a Biomarker for Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Chemosphere, 301, 134636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Iwasaki, A., Shirakusa, T., Yoshinaga, Y., et al. (2004) Evaluation of the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastasis and the Role of Risk Score as a Survival Predictor. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 26, 488-493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]