“少即是多”——芬兰教师专业自主的实践特征与支持系统
“Less Is More”—Practical Characteristics and Support System of Finnish Teachers’ Professional Autonomy
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.145798, PDF,   
作者: 张雯沛, 邱 莉*:南京师范大学教师教育学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 芬兰教师教育专业自主权教师专业化Finland Teacher Education Professional Autonomy Teacher Specialization
摘要: 芬兰在教育治理中奉行“少即是多”原则,即用较少的干预达到良好的效果。在这一赋权原则下,教师被赋予充分的专业自主权,在实践中的突出表现为教师对教学工作的掌控度极高,特点是以教师自我效能感为核心驱动力。芬兰的教育治理赋权原则厚植于其支持系统之中,社会基础、专业赋能、校长引领及合作驱动是构成这一系统的核心要素。这启示我们要创设社会信任文化支持体系、提升职前教师教育培养质量、注重教师专业评价的发展导向以及鼓励教师自我反思与协同合作。
Abstract: Finland follows the “less is more” principle in education governance, which means less intervention to achieve good results. Under this empowerment principle, teachers are endowed with full professional autonomy, and the outstanding performance in practice is that teachers have a high degree of control over teaching work, which is characterized by teachers’ self-efficacy as the core driving force. Finland’s educational governance empowerment principles are embedded in its support system, with social foundations, professional empowerment, principal leadership and collaborative drive as core elements. This suggests that we should create a social trust culture support system, improve the quality of pre-service teacher education and training, pay attention to the development orientation of teacher professional evaluation, and encourage teachers to reflect on themselves and cooperate.
文章引用:张雯沛, 邱莉. “少即是多”——芬兰教师专业自主的实践特征与支持系统[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(5): 1013-1018. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.145798

参考文献

[1] 张冰. 教师专业自主权的缺失与回归[J]. 当代教育科学, 2022(6): 65-72.
[2] Forrester, G. (2000) Professional Autonomy versus Managerial Control: The Experience of Teachers in an English Primary School. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 10, 133-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 宋宏福. 论教师专业自主权[J]. 中小学教师培训, 2004(3): 3-4.
[4] 高梦. 芬兰专业化学校管理模式研究[D]: [硕士或博士学位论文]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2019.
[5] 杨雨欣, 徐瑾劼. 芬兰教师专业自主性研究——基于TALIS 2018专业自主性框架的分析[J]. 教育参考, 2022(3): 46-52.
[6] 刘莉莉, 孔曼. 变革型领导力与教师组织承诺的关系研究——教师自我效能感的中介效应分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020(7): 97-105.
[7] 张明, 陈改, 韩梅, 王竞一. 全纳教育教师职业使命感对工作幸福感的影响: 自我效能感的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020(2): 248-254.
[8] 陈之华. 芬兰教育全球第一的秘密[M]. 北京: 中国青年出版社, 2009: 58.
[9] 帕斯·萨尔伯格. 芬兰道路: 世界可以从芬兰教育改革中学到什么[M]. 第2版. 鲍方越, 译. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2020: 196.
[10] Westbury, I., Hansén, S.E., Kansanen, P., et al. (2005) Teacher Education for Research-Based Practice in Expanded Roles: Finland’s Experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 475-485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Krokfors, L., Jyrhama, R., Kynaslahti, H., et al. (2006) Working While Teaching, Learning While Working: Students Teaching in Their Own Class. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32, 21-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Spillane, J.P. (2006) Distributed Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 16.
[13] Isoré, M. (2009) Teacher Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries and Literature Review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 梁文艳, 孙冉. 教师合作如何提升学生学业成绩?——教师教学实践和学生学习动机的链式中介作用[J]. 教师教育研究, 2020(3): 90-97.
[15] OECD (2019) TALIS 2018 Database, Tables I.4.8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef