认罪认罚从宽制度被告人反悔问题研究
On the Issue of the Repentance of the Defendant in the System of Guilty Plea
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.105285, PDF,   
作者: 张乃月:北京工商大学法学院,北京
关键词: 认罪认罚从宽制度反悔权反悔机制Leniency System Right to Repent Repentance Mechanism
摘要: 推行认罪认罚从宽制度,目的是优化司法资源配置、节约资源侧重疑难案件、提高诉讼效率,繁简分流从而化解案多人少的困境。在我国认罪认罚从宽制度已经从特别授权上升到法律制度的高度,从试点地区推广到全国范围。2018年,为期两年的试点工作已经结束,初见成效。但是在司法实践中,被告人反悔、滥用上诉权的情况时常发生,增加了不必要的司法负担。由于我国还没有明确的规定,那么有必要对被告人反悔以及反悔机制相关问题进行深入研究。
Abstract: The implementation of the leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment is aimed at optimizing the allocation of judicial resources, conserving resources, focusing on difficult cases, improving litigation efficiency, and simplifying and diverting so as to resolve the plight of more cases and fewer people. In our country, the system of leniency in plea confession and punishment has risen from special authorization to the height of the legal system, and it has been extended from the pilot area to the whole country. In 2018, the two-year pilot work has ended with initial results. However, in judicial practice, the defendant’s repentance and abuse of the right to appeal often occur, which increases unnecessary judicial burden. Since there are no clear regulations in our country, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on the defendant’s repentance and related issues of the repentance mechanism.
文章引用:张乃月. 认罪认罚从宽制度被告人反悔问题研究[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(5): 281-287. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2024.105285

参考文献

[1] 黄博儒. 被告人认罪认罚反悔权的保障机制[J]. 山西省政法管理干部学院学报, 2019, 32(1): 78-81.
[2] 程溪. 认罪认罚从宽中的反悔权问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2019.
[3] 朱孝清. 如何对待被追诉人签署认罪认罚具结书后反悔[N]. 检察日报, 2019-08-28(003).
[4] 牟绿叶. 认罪认罚案件的二审程序从上诉许可制展开的分析[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2019(3): 105-121.
[5] 程溪. 认罪认罚从宽中被追诉人反悔的应对机制构建[J]. 江西警察学院学报, 2018(4): 121-128.
[6] 郑泽坤. “悔罪悔罚上诉”现象实证研究——以389份认罪认罚上诉案件裁判文书为样本[C]//上海市法学会. 《上海法学研究》集刊——上海市法学会融孚律师事务所文集. 2019: 91-104.
[7] 马明亮, 张宏宇. 认罪认罚从宽制度中被追诉人反悔问题研究[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 34(4): 93-101.