股骨近端防旋髓内钉与股骨近端仿生髓内钉治疗不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折疗效的比较分析
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Proximal Femur Bionic Nail in the Treatment of Unstable Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1451649, PDF,   
作者: 韩 旭:青岛大学附属医院创伤外科,山东 青岛;张 歆:济南市第四人民医院心内科,山东 济南;张英泽*:河北医科大学第三医院创伤急救中心,河北 石家庄
关键词: 股骨转子间骨折骨折固定术股骨近端防旋髓内钉股骨近端仿生髓内钉Intertrochanteric Fracture Fracture Fixation Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Proximal Femur Bionic Nail
摘要: 目的:比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉(Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, PFNA)与股骨近端仿生髓内钉(Proximal Femur Bionic Nail, PFBN)治疗不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效差异。方法:对我院2022年7月~2023年7月收治的不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折患者共69例进行回顾性分析,按治疗方式将其分为PFNA组和PFBN组,PFNA组39例,PFBN组30例。分别对两组的围手术期、随访和影像资料进行比较。结果:围手术期两组间在手术时长、术中透视次数、术中出血量、住院时长差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);术后患者辅助下地时间、患肢完全负重时间、VAS评分和髋关节Harris评分,PFBN组均优于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);在影像学结果上,术后6个月,PFBN组颈干角显著大于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:对于不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折,PFBN治疗相较于PFNA治疗,可使患者早期进行负重活动,远期髋关节功能恢复更优,在提高患者生活质量上具有优势。
Abstract: Objective: A comparison was made between the efficacy of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) in the treatment of unstable geriatric intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 69 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur admitted to our hospital from July 2022 to July 2023. These patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: the PFNA group, consisting of 39 cases, and the PFBN group, consisting of 30 cases. The perioperative, follow-up, and imaging data of the two groups were compared. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups during the perioperative period (P > 0.05); the PFBN group performed better than the PFNA group in terms of the postoperative patient assisted weight-bearing time, full weight-bearing time of the affected limb, VAS scores and Harris hip scores, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In terms of imaging results, at 6 months postoperatively, the collodiaphysial angle was significantly greater in the PFBN group than in the PFNA group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For unstable geriatric intertrochanteric fractures, compared with PFNA, PFBN allows early weight-bearing activities and has advantages in improving patients’ quality of life.
文章引用:韩旭, 张歆, 张英泽. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉与股骨近端仿生髓内钉治疗不稳定型老年股骨转子间骨折疗效的比较分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(5): 2046-2053. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1451649

参考文献

[1] Adeyemi, A. and Delhougne, G. (2019) Incidence and Economic Burden of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Medicare Claims Database Analysis. JBJS Open Access, 4, e0045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Nherera, L., Trueman, P., Horner, A., Watson, T. and Johnstone, A.J. (2018) Comparison of a Twin Interlocking Derotation and Compression Screw Cephalomedullary Nail (InterTAN) with a Single Screw Derotation Cephalomedullary Nail (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Intertrochanteric Fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Andalib, A., Etemadifar, M. and Yavari, P. (2020) Clinical Outcomes of Intramedullary and Extramedullary Fixation in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 8, 190-197.
[4] Liu, W., Liu, J. and Ji, G. (2020) Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation versus InterTAN Nail for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Tian, Z., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Shi, L. and Li, W. (2022) A Retrospective Study of 98 Elderly Patients with High-Risk Lateral Femoral Wall Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures to Compare Outcomes Following Surgery with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) versus Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS). Medical Science Monitor, 28, e936923. 936923 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Bonnaire, F., Lein, T., Fülling, T. and Bula, P. (2020) Reduced Complication Rates for Unstable Trochanteric Fractures Managed with Third-Generation Nails: Gamma 3 Nail versus PFNA. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 46, 955-962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Li, L., Fang, X., Gao, J., Han, W. and Kong, X. (2024) Comparison of InterTAN and PFNA Internal Fixation for Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 40, 589-594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 朱燕宾, 丁凯, 李泳龙, 王海程, 陈伟, 侯志勇, 张奇, 王娟, 张英泽. 三角支撑固定系统固定股骨转子间骨折的生物力学有限元分析[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2021, 41(18): 1361-1366.
[9] 朱燕宾, 陈伟, 叶丹丹, 张奇, 吕红芝, 郑占乐, 张英泽. 股骨近端N三角理论及股骨近端仿生髓内钉(PFNB)的设计理念[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 7(5): 257-259.
[10] 张殿英. 支撑-牵张效应对股骨转子间骨折内固定稳定的影响[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2022, 42(2): 77-83.
[11] 张殿英. “杠杆-支点重建”理论重新认识股骨转子间骨折内固定的过去和未来[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(10): 841-845.
[12] Müller, F., Doblinger, M., Kottmann, T. and Füchtmeier, B. (2020) PFNA and DHS for AO/OTA 31-A2 Fractures: Radiographic Measurements, Morbidity and Mortality. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 46, 947-953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Irgit, K., Richard, R.D., Beebe, M.J., Bowen, T.R., Kubiak, E. and Horwitz, D.S. (2015) Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Treated with the Long Cephalomedullary Nail. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 29, e299-e304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Sadowski, C., Lübbeke, A., Saudan, M., Riand, N., Stern, R. and Hoffmeyer, P. (2002) Treatment of Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures with Use of an Intramedullary Nail or a 95 Degrees Screw-Plate: A Prospective, Randomized Study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 84, 372-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Shen, Y. and Cui, Z. (2013) Antirotation Proximal Femoral Nail versus Dynamic Hip Screw for intertrochanteric Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 99, 377-383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Gotfried, Y. (2004) The Lateral Trochanteric Wall: A Key Element in the Reconstruction of Unstable Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 425, 82-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Cowin, S.C. (1986) Wolff’s Law of Trabecular Architecture at Remodeling Equilibrium. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 108, 83-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]