《电子商务法》“通知–删除”规则适用研究
Study on the Application of the “Notice-Delete” Rule in the Electronic Commerce Law of the People’s Republic of China
摘要: 《中华人民共和国电子商务法》中“通知–删除”规则的确立为电商领域知识产权侵权纠纷提供了救济路径。然而,“通知–删除”规则在实际应用中存在电商平台的审查义务与能力不匹配、权利人与平台内经营者风险分配不均等情况,甚至成为权利人谋求不正当利益的工具。本文在结合“通知–删除”规则演变进程的基础上,分析该规则未达到立法初衷的缘由,并重新审视电商平台经营者的权责,以更好地实现该规则的立法目的,促进电商平台知识产权保护生态的良性发展。
Abstract:
The establishment of the “Notice-Delete” Rule in the Electronic Commerce Law of the People’s Republic of China has provided a relief path for intellectual property infringement disputes in the field of e-commerce. However, in the practical application of the “Notice-Delete” Rule, there is a mismatch between the examination obligation and ability of the e-commerce platform, and the uneven distribution of risks between the right holder and the platform operator, which even becomes a tool for the right holder to seek undue benefits. Based on the evolution of the “Notice-Delete” Rule, this article analyses the reasons why the rule fails to meet the original legislative intent, and re-examines the rights and responsibilities of e-commerce platform operators, so as to better achieve the legislative purpose of the rule and promote the benign development of the e-commerce platform’s intellectual property protection ecology.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
祝珺. 电商平台知识产权保护问题研究[J]. 知识产权, 2020(4): 66-73.
|
|
[2]
|
马更新. “通知-删除”规则的检视与完善[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(10): 147-160.
|
|
[3]
|
林秀芹, 李超光. 电商环境下“通知-删除”运行生态衍变阐释与重构[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 42(3): 70-77.
|
|
[4]
|
张德芬. 《电子商务法》中“通知与移除”规则评析——以专利侵权纠纷中电商平台责任为例[J]. 知识产权, 2019(3): 41-49.
|
|
[5]
|
兰昊. 电商领域知识产权“通知-删除”规则的困境与出路[J]. 知识产权, 2020(4): 53-65.
|
|
[6]
|
浙江省高级人民法院联合课题组. 关于电商领域知识产权法律责任的调研报告[J]. 人民司法, 2020(7): 65-73.
|
|
[7]
|
范艳伟, 王珏. 电商法来了, 平台怎么办?——论《电子商务法》下电商平台“通知-删除”规则的适用[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 32(6): 21-26.
|
|
[8]
|
刘晓春. 《电子商务法》知识产权通知删除制度的反思与完善[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2019(2): 124-136.
|