多方竞标交易模式下大数据商品竞价机制研究
Research on the Bidding Mechanism of Big Data Products under the Multi-Party Bidding Trading Model
摘要: 线上数据交易中如何进行买卖双方关系匹配是当前数据交易环节中的重要部分。数据类商品的定价及大数据交易所的官方指导价制定同样是当前数据交易环节的难题,数据类商品不同于寻常商品,其价值关系难以界定,供需关系难以得到精确匹配是当前阻碍数据类商品交易的拦路石。本文以社会福利最大化为目标,通过建立以VCG机制为基础的优化竞标交易模型,在提高了交易双方匹配效率的同时,通过理论分析证明对于交易双方而言“说真话”为弱占优策略,并通过模拟仿真的数据证明了双边竞价VCG机制在交易时间与交易效率两个方面大幅度领先传统交易机制。具有透明化市场价格、防止企业进行小规模抱团对市场价格进行干扰等优点,为第三方机构进行指导价的制定及整顿数据类商品市场乱象打下坚实基础。
Abstract:
How to match the relationship between buyers and sellers in online data trading is an important part of the current data trading process. The pricing of data commodities and the formulation of the official guide price of big data exchanges are also difficult problems in the current data trading link. Data commodities are different from ordinary commodities, their value relationship is difficult to define, and the difficulty of accurate matching of supply and demand is the current obstacle to the trading of data commodities. This paper aims at maximizing social welfare and establishes an optimized bidding transaction model based on the VCG mechanism, which improves the matching efficiency of both parties in the transaction, and proves that “telling the truth” is a weakly dominant strategy for both parties in the transaction through theoretical analysis, and proves through simulation that the bilateral bidding VCG mechanism has a significant advantage in both transaction time and transaction efficiency. It has the advantages of transparent market price, preventing enterprises from interfering with the market price through small-scale grouping, and laying a solid foundation for the third-party organization to formulate the guide price and rectify the chaos in the data commodity market.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Schneider, M., Day, R. and Garfinkel, R. (2015) Risk Aversion and Loss Aversion in Core-Selecting Auctions. Decision Support Systems, 79, 161-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
周乐欣, 滕可, 吕凡. 平台型物流采购双向竞标交易模式创新研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(4): 624-632.
|
|
[3]
|
孙畅, 吴占坤, 赵英姝. 我国企业应用现代物流采购技术策略研究[J]. 改革与战略, 2010, 26(6): 62-64.
|
|
[4]
|
周乐欣, 李鑫, 何康. 多式联运中转二级市场竞标交易机制研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2020, 50(9): 36-48.
|
|
[5]
|
陈华, 李庆川, 翟晨喆. 数据要素的定价流通交易及其安全治理[J]. 学术交流, 2022(4): 107-124.
|
|
[6]
|
郭鑫鑫, 李倩茹, 王海燕, 等. 需求信息不对称下数据交易拍卖定价机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(11): 170-175.
|
|
[7]
|
郑天牧, 郑月龙, 蔡琴. 大数据背景下制造商定价策略的演化博弈研究[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 50(2): 156-167.
|
|
[8]
|
张雅俊. 基于市场机制和交易场景的数据要素定价模型[J]. 社会科学家, 2023(10): 72-76 84.
|
|
[9]
|
程华, 武玙璠, 李三希. 数据交易与数据垄断: 基于个性化定价视角[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(3): 154-178.
|
|
[10]
|
欧阳日辉, 杜青青. 数据估值定价的方法与评估指标[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2022(10): 21-27.
|
|
[11]
|
郭朴, 王晓芳, 李翠田, 等. 海洋环境数据交易定价的关键基础与相关机制[J/OL]. 热带海洋学报: 1-8. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=_Kb8wOrUs9uQ9B-iceJdm9gV1d6lvrdfmVohC2SFRutCsb7txZcQoLOq1TGwecnc-tPyoWlvebgXhmLzMEFnt3t7t4Rxggg6grDarFn0LXnFyuYjQulVqUyyaItwygFaKFmilnfrY9E=&uniplatform=NZKPT&flag=copy
|
|
[12]
|
涂辉招, 刘建泉, 遇泽洋, 等. 基于改进型Stackelberg博弈的自动驾驶测试数据定价模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(11): 1735-1744.
|
|
[13]
|
袁曾. 数据规模化利用的法律规制[J]. 地方立法研究, 2023, 8(5): 71-84.
|