川西龙门山复杂构造区精细模型构建和正演
Fine Model Construction and Forward Modeling of Complex Structural Areas in Longmen Mountain, Western Sichuan
摘要: 川西龙门山前带从推覆体下盘至前陆带,构造成排成带发育,勘探有利区进一步往西北拓展。目前红星1井首次钻穿推覆构造带,栖霞组获得高产工业气流,打开了龙门山山前带的勘探局面。但研究区为典型地震勘探双复杂地区,地震资料信噪比低,成像效果差,逆掩推覆体下盘构造落实程度低,严重影响圈闭落实。基于模型的观测关键参数测试分析能在较短时间以极低成本直观反应不同采集参数最终偏移成像结果,有效指导川西北部龙门山前带观测方案设计与优化,提高地震采集质量,降低勘探风险。基于模型分析的关键部分是建模和正演,因此,依据深度剖面和近地表调查成果构建了川西北部龙门山地区逆掩推覆体构造2D高仿真地质模型,实现了基于双复杂构造的精细建模。并通过二维波动方程正演得到了模拟单炮记录,通过与野外采集单炮对比,吻合度较高,为下一步观测参数测试分析打下了基础。
Abstract: Longmen Mountain Foothill in western Sichuan is developed in a row of structures from the lower wall of the thrust block to the foreland zone, and the favorable exploration area is further expanding to the northwest. At present, the Hongxing 1 well has drilled through the thrust belt for the first time, and the Qixia Formation has obtained high-yield industrial gas flow, opening up the exploration situation in the front of the Longmen Mountain. However, the research area is a typical seismic exploration complex area, with low signal-to-noise ratio and poor imaging effect of seismic data. The degree of implementation of the lower wall structure of the overthrust nappe is low, which seriously affects the implementation of traps. Model based observation key parameter testing and analysis can intuitively reflect the final migration imaging results of different acquisition parameters in a very low cost and in a short period of time, effectively guiding the design and optimization of observation schemes in the front of Longmen Mountain in northwest Sichuan, improving the quality of seismic acquisition, and reducing exploration risks. The key parts of model analysis are modeling and forward modeling. Therefore, based on depth profiles and near surface survey results, a 2D high simulation geological model of the overthrust nappe structure in the Longmenshan area of northwest Sichuan was constructed, achieving elaborate modeling based on dual complex construction. And simulated single shot records were obtained through two-dimensional wave equation forward modeling. Compared with field collected single shot records, the agreement was high, laying a foundation for the next step of observation parameter testing and analysis.
文章引用:黎书琴, 敬龙江, 罗仕迁, 杜均国, 何艳发, 张荣峰. 川西龙门山复杂构造区精细模型构建和正演[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2024, 14(5): 697-704. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2024.145064

参考文献

[1] 赵路子, 张光荣, 陈伟, 等. 深层复杂地质构造带地震勘探关键技术——以四川盆地龙门山断褶带北段为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1): 39-48.
[2] 杨跃明, 陈聪, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地龙门山北段隐伏构造带特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(8): 8-15.
[3] 王华忠. “两宽一高”油气地震勘探中的关键问题分析[J]. 石油物探, 2019, 58(3): 313-324.
[4] 李智武, 刘树根, 陈洪德, 等. 龙门山构造带冲断带分段-分带性构造格局及其差异变形特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 4(35): 440-454.
[5] 梁霄, 刘树根, 莫倩雯, 等. 龙门山北段海相油气成藏特征及勘探前景[J]. 成都理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 45(1): 54-67.
[6] 马义忠, 魏伟, 孙伟佳, 等. 南阳凹陷高精度三维地震采集观测系统设计[J]. 石油物探, 2008, 47(5): 498-504.
[7] 崔庆辉, 尚新民, 滕厚华, 等. 高密度三维地震观测系统设计技术与应用[J]. 石油物探, 2020, 59(1): 12-22.
[8] 刘斌, 宋智强, 段卫星, 等. 地震勘探观测系统成像效果量化分析[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(2): 207-212.
[9] 屠世杰. 高精度三维地震勘探中的炮密度、道密度选择——YA高精度三维勘探实例[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2010, 45(6): 926-935.
[10] 张宇生, 魏寿云, 李可恩. 南方碳酸盐岩裸露区地震采集观测系统优化及应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2012, 17(3): 32-36.
[11] 李万万. 基于波动方程正演的地震观测系统设计[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2008, 43(2): 134-141.
[12] 王永明, 王彦春, 冯许魁, 等. 应用模型正演方法分析观测系统对复杂构造区成像的影响[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(4): 580-587.
[13] 朱金平, 董良国, 陈玖兵. 基于地震照明、面向勘探目标的三维观测系统优化设计[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2011, 46(3): 339-348.
[14] 梁顺军, 段杰, 彭业君, 等. 逆冲断褶带大断层下盘层间褶皱特征及油气成藏——以库车克拉苏构造带和龙门山构造带北段油气勘探为例[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2021, 14(4): 1-8.
[15] 梁瀚, 文龙, 冉崎, 等. 四川盆地龙门山前北段构造演化特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(3): 478-490.
[16] 孙晓猛, 杜继宇, 单玄龙, 等. 龙门山冲断带北段前山带构造分带性及山前带变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2010, 40(6): 1323-1332.
[17] 邓佳良. 龙门山北段三堆地区构造研究与三维建模[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2014.
[18] 张菊梅, 曹正林, 张道伟, 等. 柴达木盆地复杂构造带综合地质建模技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2011, 46(S1): 151-154.
[19] 成兴东, 夏时斌. GOCAD在龙门山某剖面的三维地质建模应用研究[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2015, 44(32): 59-60.