程序公正与公共政策可接受性：不确定性的中介作用
Procedural Justice and the Acceptance of Public Policy: The Mediating Role of Uncertainty
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.145358, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴玄娜, 安伊宁, 王 一*：首都师范大学心理学院，北京
关键词: 程序公正；不确定性；公共政策接受性；Procedural Justice； Uncertainty； Acceptance of Public Policy
摘要: 本研究在公共政策领域，通过问卷调查法和Scenario方法相结合的形式，探究程序公正、不确定性和公共政策可接受性变量间的关系，以及不确定性在程序公正和公共政策可接受性之间的中介作用。研究一采用问卷调查法对研究假设进行验证。为了克服问卷调查法的不足，研究二采用Scenario方法再次探究本研究假设。研究一和研究二的结果均表明：在公共政策领域，程序公正对公共政策可接受性产生积极影响，对不确定性产生消极影响。不确定性对公共政策可接受性产生消极影响。程序公正不仅能够直接正向预测政策可接受性，而且能够通过负向影响不确定性间接预测政策可接受性。
Abstract: This study explores the relationships among procedural justice, uncertainty, and acceptance of public policy, as well as the mediating role of uncertainty between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy, in the field of public policy through a combination of questionnaire surveys and scenario methods. Study 1 uses a questionnaire survey to test the research hypotheses. To overcome the limitations of the questionnaire survey, Study 2 employs a scenario method to further explore the research hypotheses. The results of both Study 1 and Study 2 indicate that in the field of public policy, procedural justice has a positive impact on acceptance of public policy and a negative impact on uncertainty. Uncertainty has a negative impact on acceptance of public policy. Procedural justice not only directly positively predicts policy acceptance but also indirectly predicts it by negatively influencing uncertainty.
文章引用：吴玄娜, 安伊宁, 王一 (2024). 程序公正与公共政策可接受性：不确定性的中介作用. 心理学进展, 14(5), 634-643. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.145358

参考文献

[1] 侯方俊, 马红宇, 梁娟(2017). 不确定感在他人的程序公正与自我的合作行为之间的中介作用. 心理科学, 40(4), 947-953.[CrossRef] 
[2] 李大治, 王二平(2007). 公共政策制定程序对政策可接受性的影响. 心理学报, 39(6), 1093-1101.
[3] 童星(2010). 公共政策的社会稳定风险评估. 学习与实践, (9), 114-119.[CrossRef] 
[4] Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009). The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491-500.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Bradford, B. (2014). Policing and Social Identity: Procedural Justice, Inclusion and Cooperation between Police and Public. Policing and Society, 24, 22-43.[CrossRef] 
[6] Bradford, B., Huq, A., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014). What Price Fairness When Security Is at Stake? Police Legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation & Governance, 8, 246-268.[CrossRef] 
[7] Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.[CrossRef] 
[8] Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining the Justice-Performance Relationship: Trust as Exchange Deepener or Trust as Uncertainty Reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1-15.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Conlon, D., & Shapiro, D. L. (2002). Employee Postings and Company Responses to Downsizing Inquiries: Implications for Managing and Reacting to Organizational Change. In J. Wagner III, J. Bartunek, & K. Elsbach (Eds.), Advances in Qualitative Organization Research (Vol. 4, pp. 39-67). JAI Press.
[11] Easton, D. (1965). A System of Analysis of Political Life. Wiley.
[12] Faccioli, M., Kuhfuss, L., & Czajkowski, M. (2019). Stated Preferences for Conservation Policies under Uncertainty: Insights on the Effect of Individuals’ Risk Attitudes in the Environmental Domain. Environmental and Resource Economics, 73, 627-659.[CrossRef] 
[13] Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of Voice and Improvement on Experienced Inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.[CrossRef] 
[14] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. The Guilford Press.
[15] Herian, M. N., Hamm, J. A., Tomkins, A. J., & Zillig, L. M. P. (2012). Public Participation, Procedural Fairness, and Evaluations of Local Governance: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 815-840.[CrossRef] 
[16] Jackson, J., Huq, A. Z., Bradford, B., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Monopolizing Force? Police Legitimacy and Public Attitudes toward the Acceptability of Violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 479-497.[CrossRef] 
[17] Leung, K., Tong, K. K., & Lind, E. A. (2007). Realpolitik versus Fair Process: Moderating Effects of Group Identification on Acceptance of Political Decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 476-489.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory & Research (pp. 27-55). Springer.[CrossRef] 
[19] Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness Heuristic Theory: Justice Judgments as Pivotal Cognitions in Organizational Relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in Organizational Justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford University Press.
[20] Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When Fairness Works: Toward a General Theory of Uncertainty Management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181-223.[CrossRef] 
[21] Madon, N. S., Murphy, K., & Sargeant, E. (2017). Promoting Police Legitimacy among Disengaged Minority Groups: Does Procedural Justice Matter More? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17, 624-642.[CrossRef] 
[22] Paterson, J. M., & Cary, J. (2002). Organizational Justice, Change Anxiety, and Acceptance of Downsizing: Preliminary Tests of an AET-Based Model. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 83-103.[CrossRef] 
[23] Reisig, M. D., Flippin, M., Mesko, G., & Trinkner, R. (2021). The Effects of Justice Judgments on Police Legitimacy across Urban Neighborhoods: A Test of the Invariance Thesis. Crime & Delinquency, 67, 1295-1318.[CrossRef] 
[24] Shan, G. N. (2010). Full Analysis of Mass Events in 2009. Southern Weekend. (In Chinese)
[25] Sleesman, D. J., & Conlon, D. E. (2016). Encouraging Prosocial Decisions: The Role of Fairness Salience and Uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 502-515.[CrossRef] 
[26] Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513-547.[CrossRef] 
[27] Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283-357.[CrossRef] 
[28] Ulbig, S. G. (2008). Voice Is Not Enough: The Importance of Influence in Political Trust and Policy Assessments. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 523-539.[CrossRef] 
[29] Vainio, A. (2011). Why Are Forest Owners Satisfied with forest policy decisions? Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Perceived Uncertainty. Social Justice Research, 24, 239-254.[CrossRef] 
[30] Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty Management: The Influence of Uncertainty Salience on Reactions to Perceived Procedural Fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931-941.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty Management by Means of Fairness Judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1-60.[CrossRef] 
[32] Van den Bos, K., Van der Velden, L., & Lind, E. A. (2014). On the Role of Perceived Procedural Justice in Citizens’ Reactions to Government Decisions and the Handling of Conflicts. Utrecht Law Review, 10, 1-26.[CrossRef] 
[33] Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When Do We Need Procedural Fairness? The Role of Trust in Authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449-1458.[CrossRef] 
[34] van Dijke, M., & Verboon, P. (2010). Trust in Authorities as a Boundary Condition to Procedural Fairness Effects on Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 80-91.[CrossRef] 
[35] Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Xie, L., & Zhou, H. (2018). Impact of Perceived Uncertainty on Public Acceptability of Congestion Charging: An Empirical Study in China. Sustainability, 11, Article 129.[CrossRef] 
[36] Wolfe, S. E., Nix, J., Kaminski, R., & Rojek, J. (2015). Is the Effect of Procedural Justice on Police Legitimacy Invariant? Testing the Generality of Procedural Justice and Competing Antecedents of Legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 253-282.[CrossRef] 
[37] Wu, G. Z., & Liu, J. H. (2021). Extending the Procedural Justice Theory to the Chinese Context: The Role of Collective Efficacy. The British Journal of Criminology, 63, 40-58.[CrossRef]