技术哲学视域下电商平台大数据杀熟问题探究
Exploration on the Problem of Big Data-Enabled Price Discrimination of E-Commerce Platform from the Perspective of Technology Philosophy
摘要: 为了探索解决“大数据杀熟”的商业伦理问题,本文首先分析了不同学科视角下对电子商务“大数据杀熟”行为的描述性定义和本质认定,揭示了“大数据杀熟”本质上是基于现代复杂技术的“算法价格歧视”和“算法商业欺诈”,凸显了技术在“大数据杀熟”三个层面行为中的决定性作用;继而通过中国古典技术哲学和西方技术哲学分析得出要解决电子商务“大数据杀熟”的伦理问题必须重视技术物对人性的调动,注意技术物对人性的遮蔽,同时通过技术物的改造来发扬人性;最后本文引入技术哲学“道德物化”理论模型对解决电子商务“大数据杀熟”提出了以下具体策略:数据可携权、打破算法黑箱、发展具身市场。
Abstract:
In order to explore and solve the business ethics problem of “big data-enabled price discrimination”, this paper first analyzes the descriptive definition and essential identification of the “big data-enabled price discrimination” behavior of e-commerce from the perspectives of different disciplines. It reveals that “big data-enabled price discrimination” is essentially “algorithmic price discrimination” and “algorithmic business fraud” based on modern complex technologies. It highlights the decisive role of technology in the three levels of “big data-enabled price discrimination”; Then, through the analysis of classical Chinese philosophy of technology and Western philosophy of technology, it is concluded that in order to solve the ethical problem of “big data-enabled price discrimination” of e-commerce, it is necessary to pay attention to the mobilization of technological objects to human nature, pay attention to the obscured of human nature by technical objects, and at the same time carry forward human nature through the transformation of technical objects; Finally, this paper introduces the theoretical model of “Materializing Morality” of technical philosophy to put forward the following specific strategies to solve the “big data-enabled price discrimination” of e-commerce: portability of data rights, breaking the algorithm black box, and developing the embodied market.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中国社会科学院. 现代汉语词典[M]. 第7版. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2023.
|
|
[2]
|
朱建海. “大数据杀熟”反垄断规制的理论证成与路径优化[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(5): 112-121.
|
|
[3]
|
刘佳明. 大数据“杀熟”的定性及其法律规制[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 21(1): 56-61 68.
|
|
[4]
|
邹开亮, 刘佳明. 大数据“杀熟”的法律规制困境与出路——仅从《消费者权益保护法》的角度考量[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018(8): 47-50.
|
|
[5]
|
孟勤国. 治理算法歧视侵害消费者权益的关键问题——以大数据杀熟为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2023(3): 37-47.
|
|
[6]
|
梁正, 曾雄. “大数据杀熟”的政策应对: 行为定性、监管困境与治理出路[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2021(2): 8-14.
|
|
[7]
|
王潺. “大数据杀熟”该如何规制?——以新制度经济学和博弈论为视角的分析[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 43(6): 52-64.
|
|
[8]
|
蔡仲德, 著. 《礼记·乐记》《声无哀乐论》注译与研究[M]. 武汉: 崇文书局, 2023.
|
|
[9]
|
李零, 著. 郭店楚简校读记增订本[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007.
|
|
[10]
|
乔瑞金, 牟焕森, 管晓刚, 主编. 技术哲学导论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009.
|
|
[11]
|
吴国盛, 编. 技术哲学经典文本[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2022.
|
|
[12]
|
张卫, 著. 内在主义技术伦理学研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2023.
|
|
[13]
|
王小伟. 道德物化的科技伦理进路及其新拓展——基于科技审度观的分析[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2023, 37(3): 178-185.
|
|
[14]
|
潘恩荣, 阮凡, 林佳佳. 资本逻辑背景下技术集成的社会风险及其演化机制[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(10): 1744-1749.
|
|
[15]
|
邢根上, 鲁芳, 周忠宝, 等. 数据可携权能否治理“大数据杀熟” ? [J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 85-95.
|