自我知觉对亲社会消费行为的影响——自我矫饰动机的中介作用
The Impact of Self-Perception on Prosocial Consumption Behavior—The Mediating Role of Self-Presentation Motivation
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.146384, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刁子桐, 丁佳宁, 尹锦煊, 刘钟秀, 王晓明*：曲阜师范大学心理学院，山东 曲阜
关键词: 自我知觉；热情；能力；自我矫饰动机；亲社会消费；Self-Perception； Warmth； Competence； Self-Presentation Motivation； Prosocial Consumption
摘要: 亲社会消费有助于公益事业发展与社会和谐。本研究基于热情–能力模型，围绕自我知觉和亲社会消费的关系，探究自我知觉倾向对亲社会消费意愿的预测作用以及自我矫饰动机在其中的中介解释。采用自我知觉、自我矫饰动机、亲社会消费意愿问卷对451名大学生进行调查，结果得出：不同自我知觉类型的被试亲社会消费意愿不同；从不同维度看，热情自我知觉正向预测亲社会消费意愿，能力自我知觉通过自我矫饰动机中介正向预测亲社会消费意愿。研究丰富了对消费者行为的研究，为亲社会消费营销提供了一定参考。未来，可通过实验法进一步观察变量之间的关系，并纳入其他影响消费行为的因素进行探讨。
Abstract: Prosocial consumption contributes to the development of public welfare undertakings and social harmony. Drawing on the warmth-competence model, this study explores the predictive role of self- perception tendencies on prosocial consumption intentions and the mediating role of self-presenta- tion motivation. Using a questionnaire survey method, the study administered questionnaires on self-perception, self-presentation motivation, and prosocial consumption intentions to 451 college students. The results indicate that participants with different types of self-perception vary in their prosocial consumption intentions. Specifically, warmth self-perception positively predicts prosocial consumption intentions, while competence self-perception positively predicts such intentions through the mediating effect of self-presentation motivation. This research contributes to the understanding of consumer behavior and provides valuable insights for prosocial consumption marketing. Future studies could further investigate the relationships between these variables using experimental methods and incorporate additional factors that may influence consumer behavior.
文章引用：刁子桐, 丁佳宁, 尹锦煊, 刘钟秀, 王晓明 (2024). 自我知觉对亲社会消费行为的影响——自我矫饰动机的中介作用. 心理学进展, 14(6), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.146384

参考文献

[1] 陆静怡(2020). 消费者的决策: 行走于理性的边缘. 教育出版社.
[2] 马龙龙(2011). 企业社会责任对消费者购买意愿的影响机制研究. 管理世界, (5), 120-126.
[3] 戚海峰, 费鸿萍, 郑玉香(2018). 利己/利他公益广告诉求对亲社会性消费行为的影响研究. 财经论丛, 34(3), 86-96.
[4] 王寒, 王帅, 郑春东(2020). 受助者热情和能力对捐赠意愿的影响——共情的中介作用. 人类工效学, 26(1), 31-36.
[5] 王家宝, 武友成, 王全丽, 厉杰(2021). 电商主播属性、消费者信任与购买意愿关系研究——基于商品价格和电商平台声誉的调节作用. 价格理论与实践, 12, 151-154.[CrossRef] 
[6] 肖捷(2012). 中国情境下社会责任消费行为量表研究. 财经理论与实践, 33(2), 89-93.
[7] 谢晓非, 王逸璐, 顾思义, 李蔚(2017). 利他仅仅利他吗?——进化视角的双路径模型. 心理科学进展, 25(9), 1441-1455.[CrossRef] 
[8] 姚琦, 吴章建, 张常清, 符国群(2020). 权力感对炫耀性亲社会行为的影响. 心理学报, 52(12), 1421-1435.
[9] 周静, 杨莹, 周天爽, 孙兰, 崔丽娟(2021). 权力感与亲社会倾向: 自我获益的中介和情境的调节作用. 心理科学, 44(2), 370-376.
[10] 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 索玉贤(2015). 社会认知内容的“大二”模型. 心理科学, 38(4), 1019-1023.
[11] 佐斌, 戴月娥, 温芳芳, 高佳, 谢志杰, 何赛飞(2021). 人如其食: 食物性别刻板印象及对人物评价的影响. 心理学报, 53(3), 259-272.
[12] Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 224-237.[CrossRef] 
[13] Baryła, W. (2014). Liking Goes from the Perceiver’s Self-Interest, but Respect Is Socially Shared. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45, 402-410.[CrossRef] 
[14] Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2010). Altruism towards Strangers in Need: Costly Signaling in an Industrial Society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 95-103.[CrossRef] 
[15] Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To Be Liked versus Respected: Divergent Goals in Interracial Interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248-264.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44.[CrossRef] 
[17] Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319.[CrossRef] 
[18] Engelmann, D., & Fischbacher, U. (2009). Indirect Reciprocity and Strategic Reputation Building in an Experimental Helping Game. Games and Economic Behavior, 67, 399-407.[CrossRef] 
[19] Fathi, M., Bateson, M., & Nettle, D. (2014). Effects of Watching Eyes and Norm Cues on Charitable Giving in a Surreptitious Behavioral Experiment. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 878-887.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Fehrler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2013). Charitable Giving as a Signal of Trustworthiness: Disentangling the Signaling Benefits of Altruistic Acts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 139-145.[CrossRef] 
[21] Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Freddi, S., Tessier, M., Lacrampe, R., & Dru, V. (2014). Affective Judgement about Information Relating to Competence and Warmth: An Embodied Perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 265-280.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.
[24] Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, Empathy, and Helping: A Person × Situation Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583-599.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations. Science, 316, 1622-1625.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Hu, T.-Y., Li, J., Jia, H., & Xie, X. (2016). Helping Others, Warming Yourself: Altruistic Behaviors Increase Warmth Feelings of the Ambient Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article No. 1349.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Ivens, B. S., Leischnig, A., Muller, B., & Valta, K. (2015). On the Role of Brand Stereotypes in Shaping Consumer Response toward Brands: An Empirical Examination of Direct and Mediating Effects of Warmth and Competence. Psychology & Marketing, 32, 808-820.[CrossRef] 
[28] Kervyn, N., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2009). You Want to Appear Competent? Be Mean! You Want to Appear Sociable? Be Lazy! Group Differentiation and the Compensation Effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 363-367.[CrossRef] 
[29] Leary, M. R., Allen, A. B., & Terry, M. L. (2011). Managing Social Images in Naturalistic versus Laboratory Settings: Implications for Understanding and Studying Self-Presentation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 411-421.[CrossRef] 
[30] Li, X., & Xie, X. (2017). The Helping Behavior Helps Lighten Physical Burden. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 183-192.[CrossRef] 
[31] Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self-Esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 357-364.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Moore, D., Wigby, S., English, S., Wong, S., Székely, T., & Harrison, F. (2013). Selflessness Is Sexy: Reported Helping Behaviour Increases Desirability of Men and Women as Long-Term Sexual Partners. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13, Article No. 182.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Snyder, M. (1974). Self-Monitoring of Expressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526.[CrossRef] 
[34] White, K., Habib, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2020). A Review and Framework for Thinking about the Drivers of Prosocial Consumer Behavior. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5, 2-18.[CrossRef] 
[35] Zivnuska, S., Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Carlson, D. S., & Bratton, V. K. (2004). Interactive Effects of Impression Management and Organizational Politics on Job Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 627-640.[CrossRef]