浅析我国遗嘱监护制度
A Brief Analysis of Our Country’s Testamentary Guardianship System
摘要: 遗嘱监护制度作为民法的重要内容之一,受到人们的广泛关注。我国《民法典》第二十九条规定了遗嘱监护制度,丰富了监护的类型。但是目前我国遗嘱监护制度仍然存在遗嘱指定冲突处理缺乏相应的规则,遗嘱指定的监护人取得报酬权和辞任权的缺失,遗嘱监护监督机制不健全的细节性问题。以问题为导向,制定遗嘱指定冲突处理模式,赋予遗嘱指定的监护人取得报酬权和辞任权,健全遗嘱监护监督机制。使遗嘱监护制度发挥其应有的作用,更好地维护被监护人的合法权益。
Abstract:
The testamentary guardianship system, as one of the important contents of civil law, has been widely concerned by people. Article 29 of China’s Civil Code stipulates the testamentary guardianship system, enriching the types of guardianship. But at present, China’s testamentary guardianship system still exists in the absence of appropriate rules for the handling of testamentary appointment conflicts, the absence of the right to get remuneration and the right to resign, and the imperfect supervision mechanism of the testamentary guardianship. Taking a problem-oriented approach, we have formulated a model for handling conflicts over testamentary appointments, given testamentary-appointed guardians the right to obtain remuneration and the right to resign, and improved the monitoring mechanism for testamentary guardianship. This will enable the testamentary guardianship system to play its proper role and better safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the ward.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
曾繁青. 我国遗嘱监护制度的困境与出路研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西民族大学, 2022.
|
|
[2]
|
朱自文. 遗嘱监护制度探析[J]. 法制与经济, 2019(2): 69-71.
|
|
[3]
|
邹叶婷. 遗嘱监护问题研究[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2020, 42(5): 84-89+107.
|
|
[4]
|
孟勤国, 唐瑞. 论遗嘱指定监护的完善——以民法典《婚姻家庭编》的编纂为重点[J]. 河北法学, 2019, 37(5): 14-25.
|
|
[5]
|
杨双. 我国遗嘱监护的完善[J]. 文化学刊, 2022(12): 135-138.
|
|
[6]
|
秦红嫚. 我国监护制度的发展、问题与完善建议——兼评《民法典(草案)》总则中的相关规定[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 44(3): 307-319.
|