论环境行政执法和解及其制度建构
On Environmental Administrative Law Enforcement Settlement and Its Institutional Construction
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.126540, PDF,   
作者: 朱晓铭:上海海洋大学海洋生物资源与管理学院,上海
关键词: 执法和解适用条件和解协议Administrative Law Enforcement Settlement Conditions Applicable Settlement Agreements
摘要: 环境行政执法和解是生态环境主管部门与相对人就环境违法行为的处理,通过平等协商达成合意并签订和解协议的执法手段。当前环境治理转型的需求、传统环境执法手段的局限为环境行政执法和解制度的确立提供了必要性支撑。但该制度在环境法领域尚未体系化,为了防止其被滥用,造成环境公共利益的损害,应规范和解制度的适用条件、启动程序、协商程序以及和解协议的履行,促使该制度落到实处,真正发挥环境保护实效。
Abstract: Environmental administrative law enforcement settlement is a means of law enforcement in which the competent ecological and environmental authorities and the relative reach a consensus and sign a settlement agreement on the handling of environmental offences through equal consultation. The needs of the current transformation of environmental governance and the limitations of traditional environmental law enforcement means provide the necessary support for the establishment of a reconciliation system for environmental administrative law enforcement. However, this system has not yet been systematized in the field of environmental law, and in order to prevent it from being abused to the detriment of environmental public interests, the conditions for the application of the settlement system, the initiation procedure, the negotiation procedure, and the implementation of the settlement agreement should be regulated, so as to promote the implementation of the system in practice, and to give real play to the effectiveness of environmental protection.
文章引用:朱晓铭. 论环境行政执法和解及其制度建构[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(6): 3808-3813. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.126540

参考文献

[1] 丘汉平. 罗马法[M]. 北京: 中国方正出版社, 2004.
[2] 徐海静. 国家环境治理任务的证成与变迁[J]. 社会科学研究, 2017(2): 74-79.
[3] 王勇. 自愿性环境协议: 一种新型的环境治理方式——基于协商行政的初步展开[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2017(3): 62-70.
[4] 张峰. 协商型环境风险规制机制的建构[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2020, 21(6): 90-100.
[5] [德]穆雷哈特·毛雷尔. 行政法学总论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2000.
[6] 张永忠, 张春梅. 行政裁量权限缩论——以税收和解适用为例[J]. 政治与法律, 2011(10): 31-40.
[7] 肖钢. 积极探索监管执法的行政和解新模式[J]. 行政管理改革, 2014(1): 4-9.
[8] 陈共炎. 证券投资者保护系列课题研究报告4 [M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2008.
[9] 李东方. 论证券行政执法和解制度——兼评中国证监会《行政和解试点实施办法》[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2015(3): 35-51+158.
[10] 康京涛. 生态环境损害赔偿磋商的法律性质及规范构造[J]. 兰州学刊, 2019(4): 50-59.
[11] 刘飞. 行政协议诉讼的制度构建[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(3): 32-47.