考虑风险承担和知识贡献的产业技术创新联盟利益分配机制
Benefit Distribution Mechanism of Industrial Technology Innovation Alliance Considering Risk Bearing and Knowledge Contribution
摘要: 产业技术创新是提高产业创新能力和核心竞争力的重要手段和途径，而产业技术创新联盟是实现产学研深度融合和产业技术创新的一种新型组织形态。然而由于目标和诉求的不同，创新主体往往并不以联盟整体利益最大化为目标投入相应的努力程度和合作程度，这直接影响到联盟的协同创新效率与稳定运行。为合理协调联盟成员间的利益关系，亟需建立一种有效的利益分配机制。基于此，针对产业技术创新联盟的利益分配问题，利用博弈论和优化模型，构建了产业技术创新联盟利益模型，分析了合作和非合作下的最优决策，考虑到风险承担和知识贡献是影响利益分配的重要因素，设计了联盟利益分配机制，并以案例验证了模型的可行性和有效性。
Abstract: The industrial technology innovation is an important means and way to improve industrial innovation capacity and core competitiveness, while its alliance is a new organizational form to realize the deep integration of industry-university-research and industrial technology innovation. However, due to the different goals and demands, innovation subjects often do not put in the corresponding degree of effort and cooperation with the goal of maximizing the overall benefits of the alliance, which directly affects the efficiency and stable operation of collaborative innovation of the alliance. In order to reasonably coordinate the interest relationship among alliance members, an effective benefit allocation mechanism is urgently needed. In view of this, we address the benefit distribution problem of industrial technology innovation alliance, construct a benefit model of industrial technology innovation alliance using game theory and optimization model, analyze the optimal decision under cooperation and non-cooperation, design the benefit distribution mechanism of alliance considering risk taking and knowledge contribution as important factors affecting benefit distribution, and verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the model with cases.
文章引用：王壮. 考虑风险承担和知识贡献的产业技术创新联盟利益分配机制[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(3): 490-509. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.143287

参考文献

[1] 殷群, 贾玲艳. 中美日产业技术创新联盟三重驱动分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2012(9): 80-89.
[2] 王发明, 杨文骏. 产业技术创新联盟共生演化过程研究: 领导企业视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(5): 58-65.
[3] 邸晓燕, 张赤东. 产业技术创新战略联盟的性质、分类与政府支持[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(9): 59-64.
[4] Wang, C., Cen, Y., Sun, R. and Ying, H. (2021) Optimal Distribution of Profit and Leadership for a Sustainable Collaborative R&D Projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, Article ID: 127874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Guo, S., Wang, J. and Xiong, H. (2022) The Influence of Effort Level on Profit Distribution Strategies in IPD Projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30, 4099-4119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 刘勇. 利益分配视角下产学研协同创新激励机制[J]. 系统管理学报, 2016, 25(6): 984-992.
[7] Du, J., Wu, H. and Zhu, L. (2018) Influencing Factors on Profit Distribution of Public-Private Partnership Projects: Private Sector’s Perspective. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, Article ID: 2143173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Zhong, Z., Jia, F., Long, W. and Chen, K.Z. (2022) Risk Sharing, Benefit Distribution and Cooperation Longevity: Sustainable Development of Dairy Farmer Cooperatives in China. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20, 982-997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Dai, P., Xu, J. and Li, W. (2022) Research on Profit Distribution of Logistics Alliance Considering Communication Structure and Task Completion Quality. Processes, 10, Article No. 1139.
[10] Liu, H., Liu, Z., Lai, Y. and Li, L. (2021) Factors Influencing Collaborative Innovation Project Performance: The Case of China. Sustainability, 13, Article No. 7380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Lucena, A. and Roper, S. (2016) Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity in R&D: Linking Technology Alliance Diversity and Firm Innovation. European Management Review, 13, 159-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Zhao, J. and Sun, N. (2019) Government Subsidies-Based Profits Distribution Pattern Analysis in Closed-Loop Supply Chain Using Game Theory. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 1715-1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Li, L., Wang, X., Lin, Y., Zhou, F. and Chen, S. (2019) Cooperative Game-Based Profit Allocation for Joint Distribution Alliance under Online Shopping Environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31, 302-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Cabello-Medina, C., Carmona-Lavado, A. and Cuevas-Rodriguez, G. (2020) A Contingency View of Alliance Management Capabilities for Innovation in the Biotech Industry. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Chen, K., Zhang, Y., Zhu, G. and Mu, R. (2020) Do Research Institutes Benefit from Their Network Positions in Research Collaboration Networks with Industries Or/and Universities? Technovation, 94, Article ID: 102002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Hofman, E., Halman, J.I.M. and Song, M. (2016) When to Use Loose or Tight Alliance Networks for Innovation? Empirical Evidence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34, 81-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Meng, F., Chen, S. and Zhang, Y. (2022) Optimal Strategies and Profit Allocation for Three-Echelon Food Supply Chain in View of Cooperative Games with Cycle Communication Structure. Information Sciences, 613, 524-540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Bierly, P.E. and Coombs, E. (2004) Equity Alliance, Stages of Product Development and Alliance Instability. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, No. 12, 191-214.
[19] Agrawal, A.K. and Yadav, S. (2020) Price and Profit Structuring for Single Manufacturer Multi-Buyer Integrated Inventory Supply Chain under Price-Sensitive Demand Condition. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, Article ID: 106208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Hughes-Morgan, M. and Yao, B.E. (2016) Rent Appropriation in Strategic Alliances: A Study of Technical Alliances in Pharmaceutical Industry. Long Range Planning, 49, 186-195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Han, R. and Yang, M. (2022) Profit Distribution and Stability Analysis of Joint Distribution Alliance Based on Tripartite Evolutionary Game Theory under the Background of Green and Low Carbon. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 59633-59652.
[22] Guo, B., Hao, S., Cao, G. and Gao, H. (2021) Profit Distribution of Liner Alliance Based on Shapley Value. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41, 5081-5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Song, C. and Wang, Y. (2022) Slot Allocation and Exchange for Container Shipping Alliance under Profit-Sharing Agreement and Uncertain Demand. Ocean & Coastal Management, 229, Article ID: 106335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Wang, X., Li, B., Wang, Y., Lu, H., Zhao, H. and Xue, W. (2022) A Bargaining Game-Based Profit Allocation Method for the Wind-Hydrogen-Storage Combined System. Applied Energy, 310, Article ID: 118472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Hosseini-Motlagh, S., Choi, T., Johari, M. and Nouri-Harzvili, M. (2022) A Profit Surplus Distribution Mechanism for Supply Chain Coordination: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 301, 561-575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] 胡争光, 南剑飞. 产业技术创新战略联盟战略问题研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(2): 74-77.
[27] 27] Jiang, X., Wang, L., Cao, B., et al. (2021) Benefit Distribution and Stability Analysis of Enterprises’ Technological Innovation Cooperation Alliance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 161, Article ID: 107637.
[28] Fu, Y. and Piplani, R. (2004) Supply-Side Collaboration and Its Value in Supply Chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 281-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Liu, Y. (2016) Incentive Mechanism for Collaborative Innovation of Industry-University form the Benefit Distribution Perspective. Journal of Systems Management, 25, 985-993.
[30] Liu, Y., Jian, L.R., Zhao, H.H., et al. (2015) Profits Distribution Model of University-Industry Collaborative Innovation Value Chain Based on Double Efforts. R&D Management, 27, 24-34.
[31] Liu, Y., Du, J., Yang, J., et al. (2019) An Incentive Mechanism for General Purpose Technologies R&D Based on the Concept of Super-Conflict Equilibrium: Empirical Evidence from Nano Industrial Technology in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 185-197.

为你推荐