大学生主动性人格对网络学习投入的影响——一个有调节的中介模型
The Influence of Proactive Personality on College Students’ Online Learning Engagement—A Mediated Model with Moderation
摘要: 为探讨大学生主动性人格对网络学习投入的关系及内在机制，本文构建了一个有调节的中介模型，探索了时间管理倾向的中介作用和教师自主支持的调节作用，运用主动性人格量表、学习投入量表、时间管理倾向量表和教师自主支持量表对862名大学生进行调查。结果发现：1) 主动性人格显著正向预测大学生网络学习投入；2) 时间管理倾向中介了主动性人格对大学生网络学习投入的影响；3) 教师自主支持调节主动性人格对时间管理倾向的影响。本研究在理论上验证并拓展了资源保存理论，丰富了网络学习投入的研究，为大学生提高学业成绩提供一定的科学依据，同时启示广大教育工作者要给予合适的教师自主支持。
Abstract: In order to explore the relationship and internal mechanism of college students’ proactive personality’s involvement in online learning, this paper constructed a moderated mediation model, explored the mediating role of time management tendency and the moderating role of teacher’s autonomous support, and used the proactive personality scale, learning engagement scale, time management tendency scale and teacher’s autonomous support scale to investigate 862 college students. The results show that: 1) Proactive personality positively predicts college students’ online learning engagement; 2) Time management inclination mediates the influence of proactive personality on college students’ online learning engagement; 3) Teacher's autonomous support moderates the impact of proactive personality on time management tendencies. The results show that teacher autonomy support, as a necessary condition, affects the role of college students’ proactive personality in e-learning. This study has verified and expanded the theory of resource conservation in theory, enriched the research of online learning input, provided a certain scientific basis for college students to improve their academic performance, and inspired the majority of educators to give appropriate teachers independent support.
文章引用：梁馨予, 李心怡, 李宇欣 (2024). 大学生主动性人格对网络学习投入的影响——一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学进展, 14(6), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.146415

参考文献

[1] 安南(2022). 教师自主支持对中学生学习投入的影响: 成长型思维和内部学习动机的中介作用. 社会科学前沿, 11(3), 771-778.
[2] 鲍旭辉, 黄杰, 李娜, 李健军, 李亚红(2022). 主动性人格对学习投入的影响: 领悟社会支持和积极情绪的链式中介作用. 心理与行为研究, (4), 508-514.
[3] 陈继文, 郭永玉, 胡小勇(2015). 教师自主支持与初中生的学习投入: 家庭社会阶层与学生自主动机的影响. 心理发展与教育, (2), 180-187.
[4] 方来坛, 时勘, 张风华(2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620.
[5] 高斌, 谭莉华, 张丹丹, 黎明新, 蔡艳香(2023). 网络社会支持与高中生网络学习投入: 有调节的中介模型. 心理与行为研究, 21(3), 403-409.
[6] 郭文斌, 苏蒙(2021). 网络学习空间教师支持对大学生学习投入的影响研究——基于学业自我效能感的中介作用. 教育理论与实践, 41(30), 50-54.
[7] 黄海雁, 许国成, 付莹(2017). 大学生成就目标定向与学习投入的关系: 时间管理倾向的中介作用. 心理学探新, 37(4), 375-379.
[8] 黄希庭, 张志杰(2001). 青少年时间管理倾向量表的编制. 心理学报, 33(4), 338-343.
[9] 姜甜甜, 曹阳, 龚少英, 刘小先, 吴亚男, 郎悦茹(2023). 教师自主支持对高中生网络学习投入的影响: 自主动机和主动性人格的作用. 心理科学, 46(6), 1336-1343.
[10] 罗杰, 陈维, 杨桂芳, 吴丹萍, 刘拓(2019). 大学生主动性人格对其拖延行为的影响: 核心自我评价的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 17(5), 692-698.
[11] 吕催芳, 周永红(2017). 研究生成就目标特点及其与时间管理倾向的关系. 教育与教学研究, 31(5), 57-63.
[12] 满凯歌(2022). 中学生主动性人格与生命意义感的关系. 硕士学位论文, 郑州: 郑州大学.
[13] 皮陆杨, 莫欣欣, 王保卫, 陈之望, 李源瑢, 何旖清(2020). 大学生主动性人格与职业决策困难的关系: 领悟社会支持与基本心理需要的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(3), 428-432.
[14] 乔伟峰, 刘威童, 李曼丽(2021). 学生眼里的在线教学: 行为, 效果与挑战——基于新冠疫情期间清华大学学生在线学习行为调查. 清华大学教育研究, 42(1), 57-66.
[15] 商佳音, 甘怡群(2009). 主动性人格对大学毕业生职业决策自我效能的影响. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 45(3), 548-554.
[16] 宋贤雯(2014). 大学生网络自主学习性别差异的调查与分析. 教育教学论坛, (2), 172-173.
[17] 孙灯勇(2016). 教师自主支持和班级目标结构对学生学习情感与投入影响的研究. 教育理论与实践, (23), 15-17.
[18] 汤丹丹, 温忠麟(2020). 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 43(1), 215-223.
[19] 王秀希, 高玉红, 臧刚顺(2014). 父母监控、时间管理倾向与中学生学习投入的关系研究. 教育探索, 34(6), 134-135.
[20] 吴峰(2022). 大学生主动性人格对择业焦虑的影响: 未来自我连续性和时间管理倾向的链式中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学.
[21] 谢菲(2021). 大学生未来时间洞察力、时间管理自我监控与学习投入的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京邮电大学.
[22] 张帝(2022). 大学生的生命意义感及其与时间管理、学习投入、学业成就的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 温州: 温州大学.
[23] 张颖, 杨付(2017). 主动性人格: 机制与未来走向. 心理科学进展, 25(9), 1544-1551.
[24] 张志杰, 黄希庭, 凤四海, 邓麟(2001). 青少年时间管理倾向相关因素的研究. 心理科学, 24(6), 649-653+764.
[25] Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The Proactive Component of Organizational-Behavior—A Measure and Correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.[CrossRef] 
[26] Bufford, R. K. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action—A Social Cognitive Theory—Bandura, A. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14, 341-342.
[27] Campbell, D. J. (2000). The Proactive Employee: Managing Workplace Initiative. Academy of Management Perspective, 14, 52-66.[CrossRef] 
[28] Chai, H., Hu, T., & Niu, G. (2022). How Proactive Personality Promotes Online Learning Performance? Mediating Role of Multidimensional Learning Engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4795-4817.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging Online Learners: The Impact of Web-Based Learning Technology on College Student Engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222-1232.[CrossRef] 
[30] Cronin, L., Marchant, D., Allen, J., Mulvenna, C., Cullen, D., Williams, G., & Ellison, P. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Autonomy-Supportive Versus Controlling Teaching and Basic Need Satisfaction versus Frustration in Relation to Life Skills Development in PE. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 44, 79-89.[CrossRef] 
[31] Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the Role of Resources in Conservation of Resources Theory. Journal of Management, 40, 1334-1364.[CrossRef] 
[32] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.[CrossRef] 
[33] Hyungshim, J., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It Is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588-600.[CrossRef] 
[34] Jin, G., & Wang, Y. (2019). The Influence of Gratitude on Learning Engagement among Adolescents: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Teachers’ Emotional Support and Students’ Basic Psychological Needs. Journal of Adolescence, 77, 21-31.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Kuhl, J. (2000). A Functional-Design Approach to Motivation and Self-Regulation: The Dynamics of Personality Systems Interactions. Handbook of Self-Regulation, 8, 111-169.[CrossRef] 
[36] Pan, Y., Quan, X. S., & Lin, W. M. (2011). Research on the Relationship between Time Management Disposition and Learning Adaptability among Normal University Students. Chinese Journal of School Health, 3, 46-57.
[37] Qiang, L. I., & University, S. (2014). Research of University Students’ Time Management Disposition. Value Engineering, 24, 145-155.
[38] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. et al. (1999). Proactive Personality and Career Success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427.
[40] Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effect of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 464-481.[CrossRef] 
[41] Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A Resource Perspective on the Work-Home Interface: The Work-Home Resources Model. American Psychologist, 67, 545-556.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive Personality and Job Performance: A Social Capital Perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1011-1017.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Won, S., & Yu, S. L. (2018). Relations of Perceived Parental Autonomy Support and Control with Adolescents’ Academic Time Management and Procrastination. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 205-215.[CrossRef] 
[44] Yan, L., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Guan, Q., Wen, G., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2021). Students’ Experience of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Province-Wide Survey Study. British Journal of Educational Technology: Journal of the Council for Educational Technology, 52, 2038-2057.[CrossRef] [PubMed]