双通道视频学习材料下的单通道不流畅性影响
The Influence of Single-Channel Disfluency in Two-Channel Video Learning Materials
摘要: 简单的认知干预可以提升在线视频学习的效率。本研究考察在视频学习方式下，操纵视觉/听觉通道信息的不流畅性对学习效果的影响。研究1目的是通过对比视听双通道不流畅信息和双通道流畅信息，证实双通道不流畅同前人研究一样，会阻碍学习；研究2采用单因素三水平的实验设计(双通道流畅、视觉单通道不流畅、听觉单通道不流畅)，目的是为了证实视频学习条件下也能发现不流畅效应。结果发现，无论是在实验1还是在实验2，不流畅条件下的学习判断、认知负荷和后测成绩均与流畅条件下没有差异，但不流畅组的学习者认为不流畅的视频不仅会对学习内容本身以及回忆内容的难易程度造成影响，也会影响他们对自己学习能力评估。合理难度理论与不流畅理论均认为，知觉不流畅所引发的额外认知负荷会促进学习，而认知负荷理论则认为会阻碍学习，但这两派理论均不能很好地解释本研究的实验结果。本研究摒弃前人研究中实验材料全程不流畅的处理，创新性地采用部分不流畅处理，虽然未能在视频学习的条件下发现不流畅效应，但未来研究仍然可以探索不流畅效应的边界条件。
Abstract: Simple cognitive intervention can improve the efficiency of online video learning. This study examines the impact of manipulating the disfluency of visual/auditory channel information on learning effects under video learning methods. The purpose of Study 1 was to compare audio-visual dual-channel disfluent information and fluent information to confirm that dual-channel disfluency, like previous studies, would hinder learning; Study 2 used a single-factor, three-level experimental design (visual single-channel disfluency, auditory single-channel disfluency channel disfluency, dual-channel disfluency), the purpose is to confirm that the disfluency effect can also be found under video learning conditions. The results showed that no matter whether in Experiment 1 or Experiment 2, the judgment of learning, cognitive load and post-test scores under the disfluent condition was no different from fluent condition, but the learners in the disfluent group believed that the disfluent video would not only affects the learning content itself and the ease of recalling the content, but also affects their assessment of their own learning ability. Desirable difficulty theory and disfluency theory both believe that extraneous cognitive load caused by perceptual disfluency will promote learning, while cognitive load theory believes that it will hinder learning, but neither theory can explain the results of this study. This study abandoned the disfluency treatment of the entire experimental material in previous studies and innovatively adopted partial disfluency treatment. Although the disfluency effect was not found under the conditions of video learning, future research can still explore the boundary conditions of disfluency effect.
文章引用：熊雪婷, 龚逸天. 双通道视频学习材料下的单通道不流畅性影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(6): 318-331. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.136503

参考文献

[1] 谢和平, 王福兴, 王玉鑫, 等. 越难读意味着学得越好? 学习过程中的不流畅效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(7): 1077-1090.
[2] Lehmann, J., Goussios, C. and Seufert, T. (2016) Working Memory Capacity and Disfluency Effect: An Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction Study. Metacognition and Learning, 11, 89-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 陈颖, 李锋盈, 李伟健. 个体关于加工流畅性的信念对字体大小效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 154-162.
[4] Cervin-Ellqvist, M., Larsson, D., Adawi, T., Stöhr, C. and Negretti, R. (2020) Metacognitive Illusion or Self-Regulated Learning? Assessing Engineering Students’ Learning Strategies against the Backdrop of Recent Advances in Cognitive Science. Higher Education, 82, 477-498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Rhodes, M.G. and Castel, A.D. (2008) Memory Predictions Are Influenced by Perceptual Information: Evidence for Metacognitive Illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615-625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D.M. and Vaughan, E.B. (2011) Fortune Favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of Disfluency on Educational Outcomes. Cognition, 118, 111-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Kühl, T., Eitel, A., Damnik, G. and Körndle, H. (2014) The Impact of Disfluency, Pacing, and Students’ Need for Cognition on Learning with Multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 189-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Strukelj, A., Scheiter, K., Nyström, M. and Holmqvist, K. (2015) Exploring the Lack of a Disfluency Effect: Evidence from Eye Movements. Metacognition and Learning, 11, 71-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Ardic, E.E. and Besken, M. (2022) Cooking through Perceptual Disfluencies: The Effects of Auditory and Visual Distortions on Predicted and Actual Memory Performance. Memory & Cognition, 51, 862-874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] İli̇c, U. and Akbulut, Y. (2019) Effect of Disfluency on Learning Outcomes, Metacognitive Judgments and Cognitive Load in Computer Assisted Learning Environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 310-321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Witherby, A.E. and Carpenter, S.K. (2022) The Impact of Lecture Fluency and Technology Fluency on Students’ Online Learning and Evaluations of Instructors. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11, 500-509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Kühl, T., Eitel, A., Scheiter, K. and Gerjets, P. (2014) A Call for an Unbiased Search for Moderators in Disfluency Research: Reply to Oppenheimer and Alter (2014). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 805-806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Miele, D.B. and Molden, D.C. (2010) Naive Theories of Intelligence and the Role of Processing Fluency in Perceived Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 535-557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Bjork, R.A. and Bjork, E.L. (2020) Desirable Difficulties in Theory and Practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9, 475-479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Alter, A.L., Oppenheimer, D.M., Epley, N. and Eyre, R.N. (2007) Overcoming Intuition: Metacognitive Difficulty Activates Analytic Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Bjork, E.L. and Bjork, R.A. (2011) Making Things Hard on Yourself, but in a Good Way: Creating Desirable Difficulties to Enhance Learning. In: Gernsbacher, M.A., Pew, R.W., Hough, L.M. and Pomerantz, J.R., Eds., Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, Worth Publishers, 56-64.
[17] James, W. (2007) The Principles of Psychology. Cosimo.
[18] Alter, A.L. and Oppenheimer, D.M. (2009) Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Eitel, A., Kühl, T., Scheiter, K. and Gerjets, P. (2014) Disfluency Meets Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning: Does Harder-to-Read Mean Better-to-Understand? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 488-501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Skulmowski, A. and Xu, K.M. (2021) Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: A New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 171-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. and Paas, F. (2019) Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Oppenheimer, D.M. and Alter, A.L. (2014) The Search for Moderators in Disfluency Research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 502-504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Oppenheimer, D.M. and Frank, M.C. (2008) A Rose in Any Other Font Would Not Smell as Sweet: Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Categorization. Cognition, 106, 1178-1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Rummer, R., Schweppe, J. and Schwede, A. (2015) Fortune Is Fickle: Null-Effects of Disfluency on Learning Outcomes. Metacognition and Learning, 11, 57-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Carpenter, S.K., Wilford, M.M., Kornell, N. and Mullaney, K.M. (2013) Appearances Can Be Deceiving: Instructor Fluency Increases Perceptions of Learning without Increasing Actual Learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1350-1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Mueller, M.L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S.K. and Rhodes, M.G. (2014) The Font-Size Effect on Judgments of Learning: Does It Exemplify Fluency Effects or Reflect People’s Beliefs about Memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., Biwer, F., Janssen, E.M. and de Bruin, A.B.H. (2022) Growing Out of the Experience: How Subjective Experiences of Effort and Learning Influence the Use of Interleaved Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 2451-2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Oppenheimer, D.M. (2008) The Secret Life of Fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Rhodes, M.G. and Castel, A.D. (2009) Metacognitive Illusions for Auditory Information: Effects on Monitoring and Control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 550-554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Weissgerber, S.C. and Reinhard, M. (2017) Is Disfluency Desirable for Learning? Learning and Instruction, 49, 199-217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] Yan, V.X., Bjork, E.L. and Bjork, R.A. (2016) On the Difficulty of Mending Metacognitive Illusions: A Priori Theories, Fluency Effects, and Misattributions of the Interleaving Benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 918-933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Yang, C., Huang, T.S.-T. and Shanks, D.R. (2018) Perceptual Fluency Affects Judgments of Learning: The Font Size Effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 99-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Bjork, R.A., Dunlosky, J. and Kornell, N. (2013) Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 499.
[35] Kornell, N. and Metcalfe, J. (2006) Study Efficacy and the Region of Proximal Learning Framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609-622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Serra, M.J. and Dunlosky, J. (2010) Metacomprehension Judgements Reflect the Belief that Diagrams Improve Learning from Text. Memory, 18, 698-711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Geller, J., Still, M.L., Dark, V.J. and Carpenter, S.K. (2018) Would Disfluency by Any Other Name Still Be Disfluent? Examining the Disfluency Effect with Cursive Handwriting. Memory & Cognition, 46, 1109-1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Geller, J. and Peterson, D. (2021) Is This Going to Be on the Test? Test Expectancy Moderates the Disfluency Effect with Sans Forgetica. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 1924-1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Tatz, J.R. and Peynircioğlu, Z.F. (2019) Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions. Memory & Cognition, 48, 581-595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Eitel, A. and Kühl, T. (2015) Effects of Disfluency and Test Expectancy on Learning with Text. Metacognition and Learning, 11, 107-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[41] Seufert, T., Wagner, F. and Westphal, J. (2016) The Effects of Different Levels of Disfluency on Learning Outcomes and Cognitive Load. Instructional Science, 45, 221-238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[42] Ball, B.H., Klein, K.N. and Brewer, G.A. (2014) Processing Fluency Mediates the Influence of Perceptual Information on Monitoring Learning of Educationally Relevant Materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 336-348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Faber, M., Mills, C., Kopp, K. and D’Mello, S. (2016) The Effect of Disfluency on Mind Wandering during Text Comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 914-919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Sungkhasettee, V.W., Friedman, M.C. and Castel, A.D. (2011) Memory and Metamemory for Inverted Words: Illusions of Competency and Desirable Difficulties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 973-978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Leppink, J., Paas, F., van Gog, T., van der Vleuten, C.P.M. and van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2014) Effects of Pairs of Problems and Examples on Task Performance and Different Types of Cognitive Load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[46] Carpenter, S.K., Northern, P.E., Tauber, S. and Toftness, A.R. (2020) Effects of Lecture Fluency and Instructor Experience on Students’ Judgments of Learning, Test Scores, and Evaluations of Instructors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26, 26-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] French, M.M.J., Blood, A., Bright, N.D., Futak, D., Grohmann, M.J., Hasthorpe, A., et al. (2013) Changing Fonts in Education: How the Benefits Vary with Ability and Dyslexia. The Journal of Educational Research, 106, 301-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[48] Weltman, D. and Eakin, M. (2014) Incorporating Unusual Fonts and Planned Mistakes in Study Materials to Increase Business Student Focus and Retention. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 15, 156-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[49] Meyer, A., Frederick, S., Burnham, T.C., Guevara Pinto, J.D., Boyer, T.W., Ball, L.J., et al. (2015) Disfluent Fonts Don’t Help People Solve Math Problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, e16-e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Yue, C.L., Castel, A.D. and Bjork, R.A. (2012) When Disfluency Is—And Is Not—A Desirable Difficulty: The Influence of Typeface Clarity on Metacognitive Judgments and Memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 229-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Dunlosky, J. and Mueller, M.L. (2016) Recommendations for Exploring the Disfluency Hypothesis for Establishing Whether Perceptually Degrading Materials Impacts Performance. Metacognition and Learning, 11, 123-131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[52] Carpenter, S.K., Mickes, L., Rahman, S. and Fernandez, C. (2016) The Effect of Instructor Fluency on Students’ Perceptions of Instructors, Confidence in Learning, and Actual Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 161-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] 龚少英, 上官晨雨, 翟奎虎, 等. 情绪设计对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 771-782.

为你推荐