新关联网络中大金融科技风险的跨界传染效应
The Cross-Border Contagion Effect of Large Fintech Risks in New Association Networks
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.143337, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 谢佳函*, 谭中明:江苏大学财经学院,江苏 镇江;吕思嘉:苏州大学商学院,江苏 苏州
关键词: 新关联网络大金融科技风险风险溢出效应GARCH-Copula模型New Association Network Big Fintech Risks Risk Spillover Effect GARCH-Copula Model
摘要: 随着新科技与金融业的深度融合,一个由金融科技公司和传统金融机构构成的新关联网络悄然形成。新关联网络中的大金融科技公司与传统金融机构间的技术与业务渗透日益紧密并对传统金融业产生风险传染与溢出。文章立足新关联网络,通过识别大金融科技风险并探寻其传染机制,选取股票收益率变量数据,利用GARCH-Copula模型测度大金融科技的风险溢出效应。结果表明:大金融科技公司的风险水平高于传统金融机构,且对传统金融业具有风险传染效应,其中对证券业的风险溢出强度最大,对银行业的风险溢出相对较弱。大金融科技对传统金融业的风险溢出强度与其在新关联网络中的关联度成正比关系,但其传染强度并不随着关联度的增加而增强。因此,要降低大金融科技风险对传统金融的风险传染溢出,必须充分运用监管科技手段,建立涵盖新关联网络各环节各渠道各层面的风险监管与防控机制,以及时发现和抑制风险的兹生、衍化和传染。
Abstract: With the deep integration of new technology and the financial industry, a new association network composed of financial technology companies and traditional financial institutions has quietly formed. The technology and business penetration between large financial technology companies and traditional financial institutions in the new association network is getting closer and closer, which will cause risk contagion and spillover to the traditional financial industry. Based on the new association network, this paper identifies big financial technology risks and explores its contagion mechanism, selects variable data of stock return rate, and uses GARCH-Copula model to measure the risk spillover effect of big financial technology. The results show that the risk level of large fintech companies is higher than that of traditional financial institutions, and it has a risk contagion effect on the traditional financial industry, among which the risk spillover strength to the securities industry is the largest, and the risk spillover to the banking industry is relatively weak. The risk spillover strength of big fintech to the traditional financial industry is proportional to its correlation degree in the new association network, but its contagion intensity does not increase with the increase of correlation degree. Therefore, in order to reduce the risk contagion spillover of large financial technology risks to traditional finance, it is necessary to make full use of regulatory and technological means, establish a risk supervision and control mechanism covering all links and channels of the new network, and timely detect and curb the emergence, evolution and contagion of risks.
文章引用:谢佳函, 谭中明, 吕思嘉. 新关联网络中大金融科技风险的跨界传染效应[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(3): 1031-1047. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.143337

参考文献

[1] 陈雨露. 推动中国金融业对外开放行稳致远[J]. 中国金融, 2021(24): 9-10.
[2] 侯传璐, 徐泽, 张伟, 编译. 金融领域中的大型科技公司: 监管方法和政策选择[J]. 金融会计, 2022(9): 42-47.
[3] Financial Stability Board (2020) BigTech Firms in Finance in Emerging Market and Developing Economies: Market Developments and Potential Financial Stability Implications.
[4] Arner, D., Buckley, R., Charamba, K., et al. (2022) Governing Fintech 4.0: Bigtech, Platform Finance, and Sustainable Development. Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, 27.
[5] Pantielieieva, N., Rogova, N., Zaporozhets, S., et al. (2022) Current Stage of Formation of the Financial Intermediation Ecosystem in the Context of Digitalization. Hrvatsko Društvo Ekonomista, 73, 215-239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Majid, B. (2019) FinTech in Financial Inclusion: Machine Learning Applications in Assessing Credit Risk. IMF Working Papers, Vol. 2019, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 蔚赵春, 徐剑刚. 监管科技RegTech的理论框架及发展应对[J]. 上海金融, 2017(10): 63-69.
[8] 张寒冰, 李智鑫, 荆一楠, 等. 数字化转型背景下金融风险监测与预警体系研究[J/OL]. 中国工程科学: 1-11.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4421.G3.20240619.1652.010.html, 2024-06-28.
[9] 郑群峰. 金融科技对商业银行风险承担的影响[J]. 金融科技时代, 2024, 32(6): 13-20.
[10] 尹振涛, 冯心歌. 大科技金融: 概念、发展与挑战[J]. 金融评论, 2020(3): 65-75+125.
[11] 刘其其, 韩慧宇. 数字经济背景下金融科技公司监管与风险防范研究[J]. 北方金融, 2024(3): 79-82.
[12] 杨科, 王健辰, 田凤平. 银行网络结构与系统性金融风险传染[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践: 1-28.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2267.N.20240402.1356.006.html, 2024-06-28.
[13] 陈斌彬. 技法相融: 应用监管科技防控金融风险的法治进路[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(4): 111-123.
[14] 侯哲. 风险视角下商业银行资产负债表的管理——基于美国三家倒闭银行的剖析[J]. 福建金融, 2024(2): 27-35.
[15] 陈梓荣, 周瑶. 偏方差波动率预测模型[J]. 上海管理科学, 2023, 45(6): 62-69+75.
[16] 王一鸣, 周泳光. 中国与国际股市波动的时变相关性检验——基于小波分析和GARCH-Copula技术[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(5): 46-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef