人们如何应对不公平待遇：公平加工的认知机制
How Do People Deal with Unfairness: The Cognitive Mechanism of Fairness Considerations
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2024.146430, PDF,   
作者: 杨邵峰：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津；天津师范大学心理学部，天津
关键词: 公平加工；公平性判断；心理推理；自我控制；最后通牒任务；Fairness Considerations； Fairness Judgement； Theory of Mind； Self-Control； Ultimatum Game
摘要: 公平是人类社会生活的重要社会规范，制约并引导着人与人之间的社会互动行为。数十年来，国内外学者对公平加工的研究取得了丰硕成果。本文基于新近的研究成果及理论模型的分析，简要介绍了公平加工的概念及其研究范式，提出一种包含公平性判断、心理推理和自我控制三种认知过程的理论模型，并回顾了支持理论模型的相关实证研究，最后对该研究领域未来的发展方向进行了展望。
Abstract: Fairness is an important social rule for human, which restricts and guides people’s behavior in social interactions. Many researchers have explored the motivational and cognitive processes underlying the fairness norm for thirty years. Here, we introduce the concept and experimental paradigm of fairness considerations, develop a cognitive model which includes fairness judgment, theory of mind and self-control, and review the current empirical literatures. Future research should explore the relationship between self-interest and the interest of others, focus on the research of individual difference, and begin moving towards practical use.
文章引用：杨邵峰 (2024). 人们如何应对不公平待遇：公平加工的认知机制. 心理学进展, 14(6), 470-476. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.146430

参考文献

[1] 任俊, 李瑞雪, 詹鋆, 刘迪, 林曼, 彭年强(2014). 好人可能做出坏行为的心理学解释——基于自我控制资源损耗的研究证据. 心理学报, 46(6), 841-851
[2] 王珍珍, 蒋文明(2016). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自行为的证据. 心理与行为研究, 14(5), 600-604, 646.
[3] 吴燕, 周晓林(2012). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 44(6), 797-806.
[4] 张振, 刘凯, 杨邵峰(2013). 非理性决策中的情绪加工及其影响因素——以最后通牒任务为例. 唐山师范学院学报, (1), 155-158.
[5] 张振(2013). 群体身份影响公平加工的行为与脑电研究. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[6] Addae, H. M., & Boso, N. (2020). Job Satisfaction, Distributive Justice, Perceived Absence Legitimacy and the Role of Turnover Intentions: An Exploratory Study in Ghana. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29, 801-822.[CrossRef] 
[7] Boksem, M. A. S., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness Concerns Predict Medial Frontal Negativity Amplitude in Ultimatum Bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 5, 118-128.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Brüne, M., Tas, C., Wischniewski, J., Welpinghus, A., Heinisch, C., & Newen, A. (2012). Hypnotic Ingroup-Outgroup Suggestion Influences Economic Decision-Making in an Ultimatum Game. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 939-946.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Burns, B. D., & Vollmeyer, R. (2002). Goal Specificity Effects on Hypothesis Testing in Problem Solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55, 241-261.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.
[11] Castillo, J. C., Palacios, D., Joignant, A., & Tham, M. (2015). Inequality, Distributive Justice and Political Participation: An Analysis of the Case of Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34, 486-502.[CrossRef] 
[12] Crockett, M. J., Clark, L., Lieberman, M. D., Tabibnia, G., & Robbins, T. W. (2010). Impulsive Choice and Altruistic Punishment Are Correlated and Increase in Tandem with Serotonin Depletion. Emotion, 10, 855-862.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Deng, L., Li, Q., Zhang, M., Shi, P., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Distinct Neural Dynamics Underlying Risk and Ambiguity during Valued‐based Decision Making. Psychophysiology, 60, e14201.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A Theory of Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54, 293-315.[CrossRef] 
[15] Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.[CrossRef] 
[16] Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in Young Children. Nature, 454, 1079-1083.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., & Crone, E. A. (2009). Fairness Considerations: Increasing Understanding of Intentionality during Adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 398-409.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Unfair? It Depends: Neural Correlates of Fairness in Social Context. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 414-423.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Dissociable Brain Networks Involved in Development of Fairness Considerations: Understanding Intentionality behind Unfairness. NeuroImage, 57, 634-641.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367-388.[CrossRef] 
[21] Jiao, J., & Zhao, J. (2023). Individualism, Collectivism, and Allocation Behavior: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game. Behavioral Sciences, 13, 169-189.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fehr, E. (2007). Studying the Neurobiology of Social Interaction with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation—The Example of Punishing Unfairness. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1987-1990.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex. Science, 314, 829-832.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Liu, S., Hu, X., & Mai, X. (2021). Social Distance Modulates Outcome Processing When Comparing Abilities with Others. Psychophysiology, 58, e13798.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Steinbeis, N., & Warneken, F. (2017). The Developmental Foundations of Human Fairness. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article No. 42.[CrossRef] 
[26] Radke, S., Güroğlu, B., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. (2012). There’s Something about a Fair Split: Intentionality Moderates Context-Based Fairness Considerations in Social Decision-Making. PLOS ONE, 7, e31491.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Sally, D., & Hill, E. (2006). The Development of Interpersonal Strategy: Autism, Theory-of-Mind, Cooperation and Fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 73-97.[CrossRef] 
[28] Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., Shinada, M. et al. (2012). Rejection of Unfair Offers in the Ultimatum Game Is No Evidence of Strong Reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 20364-20368.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Takagishi, H., Shinada, M., Tanida, S., & Cook, K. S. (2009). The Private Rejection of Unfair Offers and Emotional Commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 11520-11523.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Zhang, S., & Zhou, J. (2018). Social Justice and Public Cooperation Intention: Mediating Role of Political Trust and Moderating Effect of Outcome Dependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 382465.[CrossRef] [PubMed]